Meteor vs Spring-Boot

Overview

Meteor

Stacks1.9K

Followers1.8K

Votes1.7K

GitHub Stars44.8K

Forks5.3K

Spring Boot

Stacks26.7K

Followers24.3K

Votes1.0K

GitHub Stars78.9K

Forks41.6K

Meteor vs Spring-Boot: What are the differences?

Introduction:

Meteor and Spring Boot are both popular platforms for web development, but they have distinct differences that cater to different needs and preferences.

Architecture: Meteor is a full-stack platform that enables developers to build applications using a single language (JavaScript). In contrast, Spring Boot is a microservices-based framework that allows for greater flexibility and scalability in building complex enterprise applications by supporting multiple programming languages.
Real-time capabilities: Meteor comes with built-in support for real-time communication through its 'live data' feature, allowing data changes to be propagated instantly to connected clients. Spring Boot, on the other hand, requires additional configuration and integration with technologies like WebSockets or message queues to achieve real-time functionality.
Database Integration: Meteor provides seamless integration with MongoDB, making it easy for developers to work with NoSQL databases. Spring Boot, on the other hand, supports a wider range of database options, including relational databases like MySQL and PostgreSQL, through its robust integration capabilities.
Community and Ecosystem: Spring Boot has a large and active community, with extensive documentation, tutorials, and plugins available to support developers. Meteor, while having a dedicated user base, may have fewer resources and community support compared to Spring Boot.
Scalability and Performance: Spring Boot's microservices architecture allows for better scalability and performance optimization, making it a preferred choice for large-scale applications where performance is a critical factor. Meteor, while capable of handling real-time applications efficiently, may face challenges in scaling to accommodate a growing user base.
Deployment Flexibility: Spring Boot offers more deployment options, such as traditional application servers, containerization with Docker, or cloud-native deployment on platforms like Kubernetes. Meteor, while supporting deployment to various cloud services, may have limitations in terms of deployment strategies and flexibility.

In Summary, Meteor and Spring Boot differ in architectural approach, real-time capabilities, database integration, community support, scalability/performance, and deployment options.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Meteor, Spring Boot

Eva

Fullstack developer

Jul 28, 2020

Needs adviceon

Java

Spring Boot

JavaScript

Hello, I am a fullstack web developer. I have been working for a company with Java/ Spring Boot and client-side JavaScript(mainly jQuery, some AngularJS) for the past 4 years. As I wish to now work as a freelancer, I am faced with a dilemma: which stack to choose given my current knowledge and the state of the market?

I've heard PHP is very popular in the freelance world. I don't know PHP. However, I'm sure it wouldn't be difficult to learn since it has many similarities with Java (OOP). It seems to me that Laravel has similarities with Spring Boot (it's MVC and OOP). Also, people say Laravel works well with Vue.js, which is my favorite JS framework.

On the other hand, I already know the Javascript language, and I like Vue.js, so I figure I could go the fullstack Javascript route with ExpressJS. However, I am not sure if these techs are ripe for freelancing (with regards to RAD, stability, reliability, security, costs, etc.) Is it true that Express is almost always used with MongoDB? Because my experience is mostly with SQL databases.

The projects I would like to work on are custom web applications/websites for small businesses. I have developed custom ERPs before and found that Java was a good fit, except for it taking a long time to develop. I cannot make a choice, and I am constantly switching between trying PHP and Node.js/Express. Any real-world advice would be welcome! I would love to find a stack that I enjoy while doing meaningful freelance coding.

826k views826k

Comments

Slimane

Jul 9, 2020

Needs adviceon

Spring Boot

NestJS

Node.js

I am currently planning to build a project from scratch. I will be using Angular as front-end framework, but for the back-end I am not sure which framework to use between Spring Boot and NestJS. I have worked with Spring Boot before, but my new project contains a lot of I/O operations, in fact it will show a daily report. I thought about the new Spring Web Reactive Framework but given the idea that Node.js is the most popular on handling non blocking I/O I am planning to start learning NestJS since it is based on Angular philosophy and TypeScript which I am familiar with. Looking forward to hear from you dear Community.

917k views917k

Comments

Anonymous

Sep 15, 2020

Needs adviceon

Kotlin

Django

I’ve been using Django for the last year on and off to do my backend API. I’m getting a bit frustrated with the Django REST framework with the setup of the serializers and Django for the lack of web sockets. I’m considering either Spring or .NET Core. I’m familiar with Kotlin and C# but I’ve not built any substantial projects with them. I like OOP, building a desktop app, web API, and also the potential to get a job in the future or building a tool at work to manage my documents, dashboard and processes point cloud data.

I’m familiar with c/cpp, TypeScript.

I would love your insights on where I should go.

617k views617k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Meteor	Spring Boot
A Meteor application is a mix of JavaScript that runs inside a client web browser, JavaScript that runs on the Meteor server inside a Node.js container, and all the supporting HTML fragments, CSS rules, and static assets.	Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.
Pure JavaScript;Live page updates;Clean, powerful data synchronization;Latency compensation;Hot Code Pushes;Sensitive code runs in a privileged environment;Fully self-contained application bundles; Interoperability;Smart Packages	-
Statistics
GitHub Stars 44.8K	GitHub Stars 78.9K
GitHub Forks 5.3K	GitHub Forks 41.6K
Stacks 1.9K	Stacks 26.7K
Followers 1.8K	Followers 24.3K
Votes 1.7K	Votes 1.0K
Pros & Cons
Pros 251 Real-time 200 Full stack, one language 183 Best app dev platform available today 155 Data synchronization 152 Javascript Cons 5 Does not scale well 4 Hard to debug issues on the server-side 4 Heavily CPU bound	Pros 149 Powerful and handy 134 Easy setup 128 Java 90 Spring 85 Fast Cons 23 Heavy weight 18 Annotation ceremony 13 Java 11 Many config files needed 5 Reactive
Integrations
AngularJS React MongoDB Node.js Apache Cordova	Spring Java

What are some alternatives to Meteor, Spring Boot?

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Bower

Bower is a package manager for the web. It offers a generic, unopinionated solution to the problem of front-end package management, while exposing the package dependency model via an API that can be consumed by a more opinionated build stack. There are no system wide dependencies, no dependencies are shared between different apps, and the dependency tree is flat.

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Related Comparisons

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Meteor vs Spring-Boot: What are the differences?

Introduction:

Meteor and Spring Boot are both popular platforms for web development, but they have distinct differences that cater to different needs and preferences.

Architecture: Meteor is a full-stack platform that enables developers to build applications using a single language (JavaScript). In contrast, Spring Boot is a microservices-based framework that allows for greater flexibility and scalability in building complex enterprise applications by supporting multiple programming languages.
Real-time capabilities: Meteor comes with built-in support for real-time communication through its 'live data' feature, allowing data changes to be propagated instantly to connected clients. Spring Boot, on the other hand, requires additional configuration and integration with technologies like WebSockets or message queues to achieve real-time functionality.
Database Integration: Meteor provides seamless integration with MongoDB, making it easy for developers to work with NoSQL databases. Spring Boot, on the other hand, supports a wider range of database options, including relational databases like MySQL and PostgreSQL, through its robust integration capabilities.
Community and Ecosystem: Spring Boot has a large and active community, with extensive documentation, tutorials, and plugins available to support developers. Meteor, while having a dedicated user base, may have fewer resources and community support compared to Spring Boot.
Scalability and Performance: Spring Boot's microservices architecture allows for better scalability and performance optimization, making it a preferred choice for large-scale applications where performance is a critical factor. Meteor, while capable of handling real-time applications efficiently, may face challenges in scaling to accommodate a growing user base.
Deployment Flexibility: Spring Boot offers more deployment options, such as traditional application servers, containerization with Docker, or cloud-native deployment on platforms like Kubernetes. Meteor, while supporting deployment to various cloud services, may have limitations in terms of deployment strategies and flexibility.

In Summary, Meteor and Spring Boot differ in architectural approach, real-time capabilities, database integration, community support, scalability/performance, and deployment options.