Meteor vs TypeScript

Overview

Meteor

Stacks1.9K

Followers1.8K

Votes1.7K

GitHub Stars44.8K

Forks5.3K

TypeScript

Stacks105.1K

Followers74.2K

Votes503

GitHub Stars106.6K

Forks13.1K

Meteor vs TypeScript: What are the differences?

Data Layer: Meteor includes its own data layer called Minimongo, which is a client-side, in-memory database. TypeScript is a superset of JavaScript that primarily focuses on adding static typing to JavaScript, offering no specific data layer functionality.
Build System: Meteor comes with its own build system that handles the process of bundling, minifying, and serving both client and server-side code. TypeScript, on the other hand, requires a separate build system like Webpack or Gulp to compile the TypeScript code into JavaScript.
Real-time Communication: Meteor provides seamless real-time communication through its DDP (Distributed Data Protocol) which allows for automatic data synchronization between the server and client. TypeScript does not offer any specific real-time communication protocol or functionality out of the box.
Scalability: Meteor is known for its ease of scalability with built-in features like live reloading and hot code pushes, making it easier to handle large-scale applications. TypeScript, while adding type safety and scalability through static typing, does not provide built-in scalability features like hot code pushes.
Community Support: TypeScript has a larger and more active community compared to Meteor, with a vast array of libraries, tools, and resources available to developers. Meteor has a more concentrated but smaller community, which may limit the availability of certain resources or support.
Deployment Options: Meteor offers easy deployment options with built-in support for deploying apps to its Galaxy platform, simplifying the deployment process. TypeScript, being a language, does not have specific deployment options but relies on traditional methods like deploying JavaScript applications.

In Summary, Meteor and TypeScript differ in data layer, build system, real-time communication, scalability, community support, and deployment options.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Meteor, TypeScript

Jarvis

May 16, 2019

Reviewon

TypeScript

Flow (JS)

I use TypeScript because it isn't just about validating the types I'm expecting to receive though that is a huge part of it too. Flow (JS) seems to be a type system only. TypeScript also allows you to use the latest features of JavaScript while also providing the type checking. To be fair to Flow (JS), I have not used it, but likely wouldn't have due to the additional features I get from TypeScript.

168k views168k

Comments

David

VP Engineering at Trolley

May 16, 2019

Reviewon

JavaScript

Flow (JS)

TypeScript

We originally (in 2017) started rewriting our platform from JavaScript to Flow (JS) but found the library support for Flow was lacking. After switching gears to TypeScript we've never looked back. At this point we're finding that frontend and backend libraries are supporting TypeScript out of the box and where the support is missing that the commuity is typically got a solution in hand.

173k views173k

Comments

StackShare

Aug 13, 2019

Needs adviceon

TypeScript

CoffeeScript

JavaScript

From a StackShare community member: "We are looking to rewrite our outdated front-end with TypeScript. Right now we have a mix of CoffeeScript and vanilla JavaScript. I have read that adopting TypeScript can help enforce better code quality, and best practices. I also heard good things about Flow (JS). Which one would you recommend and why?"

405k views405k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Meteor	TypeScript
A Meteor application is a mix of JavaScript that runs inside a client web browser, JavaScript that runs on the Meteor server inside a Node.js container, and all the supporting HTML fragments, CSS rules, and static assets.	TypeScript is a language for application-scale JavaScript development. It's a typed superset of JavaScript that compiles to plain JavaScript.
Pure JavaScript;Live page updates;Clean, powerful data synchronization;Latency compensation;Hot Code Pushes;Sensitive code runs in a privileged environment;Fully self-contained application bundles; Interoperability;Smart Packages	-
Statistics
GitHub Stars 44.8K	GitHub Stars 106.6K
GitHub Forks 5.3K	GitHub Forks 13.1K
Stacks 1.9K	Stacks 105.1K
Followers 1.8K	Followers 74.2K
Votes 1.7K	Votes 503
Pros & Cons
Pros 251 Real-time 200 Full stack, one language 183 Best app dev platform available today 155 Data synchronization 152 Javascript Cons 5 Does not scale well 4 Hard to debug issues on the server-side 4 Heavily CPU bound	Pros 173 More intuitive and type safe javascript 105 Type safe 80 JavaScript superset 48 The best AltJS ever 27 Best AltJS for BackEnd Cons 5 Code may look heavy and confusing 4 Hype
Integrations
AngularJS React MongoDB Node.js Apache Cordova	No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Meteor, TypeScript?

JavaScript

JavaScript is most known as the scripting language for Web pages, but used in many non-browser environments as well such as node.js or Apache CouchDB. It is a prototype-based, multi-paradigm scripting language that is dynamic,and supports object-oriented, imperative, and functional programming styles.

Python

Python is a general purpose programming language created by Guido Van Rossum. Python is most praised for its elegant syntax and readable code, if you are just beginning your programming career python suits you best.

PHP

Fast, flexible and pragmatic, PHP powers everything from your blog to the most popular websites in the world.

Ruby

Ruby is a language of careful balance. Its creator, Yukihiro “Matz” Matsumoto, blended parts of his favorite languages (Perl, Smalltalk, Eiffel, Ada, and Lisp) to form a new language that balanced functional programming with imperative programming.

Java

Java is a programming language and computing platform first released by Sun Microsystems in 1995. There are lots of applications and websites that will not work unless you have Java installed, and more are created every day. Java is fast, secure, and reliable. From laptops to datacenters, game consoles to scientific supercomputers, cell phones to the Internet, Java is everywhere!

Golang

Go is expressive, concise, clean, and efficient. Its concurrency mechanisms make it easy to write programs that get the most out of multicore and networked machines, while its novel type system enables flexible and modular program construction. Go compiles quickly to machine code yet has the convenience of garbage collection and the power of run-time reflection. It's a fast, statically typed, compiled language that feels like a dynamically typed, interpreted language.

HTML5

HTML5 is a core technology markup language of the Internet used for structuring and presenting content for the World Wide Web. As of October 2014 this is the final and complete fifth revision of the HTML standard of the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C). The previous version, HTML 4, was standardised in 1997.

C#

C# (pronounced "See Sharp") is a simple, modern, object-oriented, and type-safe programming language. C# has its roots in the C family of languages and will be immediately familiar to C, C++, Java, and JavaScript programmers.

Scala

Scala is an acronym for “Scalable Language”. This means that Scala grows with you. You can play with it by typing one-line expressions and observing the results. But you can also rely on it for large mission critical systems, as many companies, including Twitter, LinkedIn, or Intel do. To some, Scala feels like a scripting language. Its syntax is concise and low ceremony; its types get out of the way because the compiler can infer them.

Elixir

Elixir leverages the Erlang VM, known for running low-latency, distributed and fault-tolerant systems, while also being successfully used in web development and the embedded software domain.

Related Comparisons

Meteor vs TypeScript: What are the differences?

Data Layer: Meteor includes its own data layer called Minimongo, which is a client-side, in-memory database. TypeScript is a superset of JavaScript that primarily focuses on adding static typing to JavaScript, offering no specific data layer functionality.
Build System: Meteor comes with its own build system that handles the process of bundling, minifying, and serving both client and server-side code. TypeScript, on the other hand, requires a separate build system like Webpack or Gulp to compile the TypeScript code into JavaScript.
Real-time Communication: Meteor provides seamless real-time communication through its DDP (Distributed Data Protocol) which allows for automatic data synchronization between the server and client. TypeScript does not offer any specific real-time communication protocol or functionality out of the box.
Scalability: Meteor is known for its ease of scalability with built-in features like live reloading and hot code pushes, making it easier to handle large-scale applications. TypeScript, while adding type safety and scalability through static typing, does not provide built-in scalability features like hot code pushes.
Community Support: TypeScript has a larger and more active community compared to Meteor, with a vast array of libraries, tools, and resources available to developers. Meteor has a more concentrated but smaller community, which may limit the availability of certain resources or support.
Deployment Options: Meteor offers easy deployment options with built-in support for deploying apps to its Galaxy platform, simplifying the deployment process. TypeScript, being a language, does not have specific deployment options but relies on traditional methods like deploying JavaScript applications.

In Summary, Meteor and TypeScript differ in data layer, build system, real-time communication, scalability, community support, and deployment options.

Meteor vs TypeScript

Overview