Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Micro vs Visual Studio Code: What are the differences?
Key Differences between Micro and Visual Studio Code
1. Installation and Setup:
Micro is a lightweight text editor that can be easily installed on various operating systems and requires minimal setup. On the other hand, Visual Studio Code is a more feature-rich code editor that requires a slightly longer installation process and additional configuration to optimize its functionality.
2. User Interface:
Micro has a simple and minimalistic user interface with a command line-like appearance, which may appeal to users who prefer a clean and straightforward interface. Visual Studio Code, on the other hand, offers a more comprehensive and customizable interface with various panels, sidebars, and menus, providing a more robust editing environment.
3. Extensions and Plugins:
While Micro supports plugins, its library of available extensions is relatively limited compared to Visual Studio Code. Visual Studio Code has a vast marketplace with a wide range of extensions and plugins, offering users an extensive selection of additional features and functionalities to enhance their coding experience.
4. Debugging Capabilities:
Visual Studio Code has built-in debugging tools and supports multiple programming languages, allowing users to debug their code directly within the editor. Micro, being a lightweight editor, does not have native debugging capabilities, and users would need to rely on external debugging tools provided by their programming language or framework.
5. Operating System Compatibility:
Micro is designed to be highly compatible with different operating systems, including Windows, macOS, and Linux. Visual Studio Code, while also compatible with these operating systems, offers additional support for more niche environments, such as ARM-based systems and Raspberry Pi.
6. Performance and Resource Usage:
Due to its lightweight nature, Micro is designed to consume minimal system resources, making it a suitable choice for low-spec machines or when efficient resource usage is a priority. Visual Studio Code, being a more feature-rich editor, may require more system resources, especially when working with larger projects or using multiple extensions simultaneously.
In Summary, Micro is a lightweight and minimalistic text editor with simple installation and user interface, whereas Visual Studio Code is a more comprehensive editor with a broader range of features and customization options, extensive extension support, built-in debugging capabilities, and broader compatibility with operating systems.
Lightweight and versatile. Huge library of extensions that enable you to integrate a host of services to your development environment. VS Code's biggest strength is its library of extensions which enables it to directly compete with every single major IDE for almost all major programming languages.
Visual Studio Code became famous over the past 3+ years I believe. The clean UI, easy to use UX and the plethora of integrations made it a very easy decision for us. Our gripe with Sublime was probably only the UX side. VSCode has not failed us till now, and still is able to support our development env without any significant effort.
Goland being paid, as well as built only for Go seemed like a significant limitation to not consider it.
I decided to choose VSCode over Sublime text for my Systems Programming class in C. What I love about VSCode is its awesome ability to add extensions. Intellisense is a beautiful debugger, and Remote SSH allows me to login and make real-time changes in VSCode to files on my university server. This is an awesome alternative to going back and forth on pushing/pulling code and logging into servers in the terminal. Great choice for anyone interested in C programming!
Pros of Micro
- It feels like a GUI-based editor ... in a terminal4
- Easy to use3
- Supports traditional ctrl shortcuts and copyboard1
Pros of Visual Studio Code
- Powerful multilanguage IDE340
- Fast308
- Front-end develop out of the box193
- Support TypeScript IntelliSense158
- Very basic but free142
- Git integration126
- Intellisense106
- Faster than Atom78
- Better ui, easy plugins, and nice git integration53
- Great Refactoring Tools45
- Good Plugins44
- Terminal42
- Superb markdown support38
- Open Source36
- Extensions34
- Large & up-to-date extension community26
- Awesome UI26
- Powerful and fast24
- Portable22
- Best editor18
- Best code editor18
- Easy to get started with17
- Lots of extensions15
- Built on Electron15
- Crossplatform15
- Good for begginers15
- Extensions for everything14
- Open, cross-platform, fast, monthly updates14
- All Languages Support14
- Easy to use and learn13
- Extensible12
- "fast, stable & easy to use"12
- Totally customizable11
- Git out of the box11
- Faster edit for slow computer11
- Ui design is great11
- Useful for begginer11
- Great community10
- SSH support10
- Fast Startup10
- It has terminal and there are lots of shortcuts in it9
- Powerful Debugger9
- Great language support9
- Works With Almost EveryThing You Need9
- Python extension is fast8
- Can compile and run .py files8
- Great document formater7
- Features rich7
- He is not Michael6
- Awesome multi cursor support6
- Extension Echosystem6
- She is not Rachel6
- Language server client5
- Easy azure5
- SFTP Workspace5
- VSCode.pro Course makes it easy to learn5
- Very proffesional5
- Supports lots of operating systems4
- Has better support and more extentions for debugging4
- Excellent as git difftool and mergetool4
- Virtualenv integration4
- Has more than enough languages for any developer3
- Better autocompletes than Atom3
- Emmet preinstalled3
- 'batteries included'3
- More tools to integrate with vs3
- VS Code Server: Browser version of VS Code2
- Big extension marketplace2
- Customizable2
- Microsoft2
- Light2
- Fast and ruby is built right in2
- CMake support with autocomplete2
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Micro
Cons of Visual Studio Code
- Slow startup46
- Resource hog at times29
- Poor refactoring20
- Poor UI Designer13
- Weak Ui design tools11
- Poor autocomplete10
- Super Slow8
- Huge cpu usage with few installed extension8
- Microsoft sends telemetry data8
- Poor in PHP7
- It's MicroSoft6
- Poor in Python3
- No Built in Browser Preview3
- No color Intergrator3
- Very basic for java development and buggy at times3
- No built in live Preview3
- Electron3
- Bad Plugin Architecture2
- Powered by Electron2
- Terminal does not identify path vars sometimes1
- Slow C++ Language Server1