Microsoft IIS vs Puma: What are the differences?

# Introduction

1. **Scalability**:
   Microsoft IIS is more suited for large scale enterprise applications due to its ability to handle a high volume of traffic efficiently, while Puma is more commonly used for smaller to medium-sized applications.
2. **Supported platforms**:
   Microsoft IIS is primarily designed to run on Windows servers, while Puma is designed to work on Unix-based systems like Linux.
3. **Language support**:
   Microsoft IIS is optimized for hosting applications built on the .NET framework, while Puma is more commonly used for hosting Ruby applications.
4. **Configuration flexibility**:
   Microsoft IIS offers a more user-friendly graphical interface for configuration, while Puma requires more manual configuration through code or configuration files.
5. **Resource consumption**:
   Microsoft IIS tends to consume more system resources compared to Puma, making it less efficient in terms of resource utilization.
6. **Community support**:
   Puma has a more active open-source community that regularly contributes to its development and provides support, whereas Microsoft IIS has more official support channels provided by Microsoft.

In Summary, Microsoft IIS and Puma differ in terms of scalability, supported platforms, language support, configuration flexibility, resource consumption, and community support.