StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Platform as a Service
  4. Web Servers
  5. Microsoft IIS vs XAMPP

Microsoft IIS vs XAMPP

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Microsoft IIS
Microsoft IIS
Stacks15.5K
Followers7.7K
Votes236
XAMPP
XAMPP
Stacks142
Followers272
Votes6

Microsoft IIS vs XAMPP: What are the differences?

Introduction

Markdown code for the website page on the key differences between Microsoft IIS and XAMPP is provided below. The following paragraphs highlight six specific differences between the two webserver solutions.

  1. Deployment and Compatibility: Microsoft IIS, also known as Internet Information Services, is a webserver software developed by Microsoft for Windows-based servers. It is specifically designed to work with Windows operating systems, offering seamless integration with Windows Server and various Microsoft technologies. On the other hand, XAMPP is a cross-platform web development solution that can run on different operating systems such as Windows, macOS, and Linux. It provides compatibility for multiple platforms, making it a more versatile choice for webserver deployment.

  2. Software Bundle: While both IIS and XAMPP are webserver solutions, they differ in terms of their bundled software. Microsoft IIS comes as a part of the Windows Server package, offering integration with other Microsoft server tools such as SQL Server and Active Directory. XAMPP, on the other hand, is a software bundle that includes not only the Apache web server, but also MySQL or MariaDB database, PHP, and Perl. This bundled package provides developers with a complete web development stack, allowing for easy setup and configuration.

  3. Ease of Use and Configuration: In terms of ease of use, XAMPP generally provides a simpler setup process compared to Microsoft IIS. XAMPP is user-friendly, offering a clear graphical user interface that allows users to easily start or stop the webserver and configure various modules. On the other hand, Microsoft IIS can be more complex to set up, especially for novice users, as it requires a deeper understanding of Windows Server and its features.

  4. Scalability and Performance: Microsoft IIS is known for its scalability and performance, especially when utilized in enterprise environments. It integrates well with other Microsoft technologies, providing enhanced performance and scalability options. XAMPP, while capable of handling small to medium-sized projects efficiently, may not offer the same level of scalability and performance as Microsoft IIS. However, XAMPP's simplicity and lightweight nature make it a suitable choice for smaller development projects or personal use.

  5. Security and Updates: When it comes to security, both Microsoft IIS and XAMPP receive regular updates, addressing vulnerabilities and improving security features. However, due to its popularity and wide-scale adoption, Microsoft IIS often benefits from the extensive security resources and support provided by Microsoft. XAMPP, being an open-source solution, requires users to stay on top of updates and security measures actively. It is crucial for XAMPP users to frequently check for updates, implement recommended security configurations, and monitor the software for any potential vulnerabilities.

  6. Support and Community: Microsoft IIS has dedicated technical support from Microsoft, making it easier to find assistance and resolve issues promptly. It also benefits from an active user community and extensive online resources. XAMPP, as an open-source solution, relies on community support and forums for assistance. While XAMPP has a significant community following and many online resources are available, the level of support may vary and might not be as comprehensive as that provided by Microsoft for IIS.

In summary, Microsoft IIS offers seamless integration with Windows-based servers and Microsoft technologies, while XAMPP provides cross-platform compatibility and a bundled solution with a complete web development stack. Microsoft IIS is known for its scalability and performance in enterprise environments, whereas XAMPP is more user-friendly and easy to set up for smaller projects. Security measures and support vary between the two, with Microsoft IIS benefiting from dedicated Microsoft resources, while XAMPP relies on community support.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Microsoft IIS, XAMPP

greg00m
greg00m

Mar 9, 2020

Needs advice

I am diving into web development, both front and back end. I feel comfortable with administration, scripting and moderate coding in bash, Python and C++, but I am also a Windows fan (i love inner conflict). What are the votes on web servers? IIS is expensive and restrictive (has Windows adoption of open source changed this?) Apache has the history but seems to be at the root of most of my Infosec issues, and I know nothing about nginx (is it too new to rely on?). And no, I don't know what I want to do on the web explicitly, but hosting and data storage (both cloud and tape) are possibilities.
Ready, aim fire!

766k views766k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Microsoft IIS
Microsoft IIS
XAMPP
XAMPP

Internet Information Services (IIS) for Windows Server is a flexible, secure and manageable Web server for hosting anything on the Web. From media streaming to web applications, IIS's scalable and open architecture is ready to handle the most demanding tasks.

It consists mainly of the Apache HTTP Server, MariaDB database, and interpreters for scripts written in the PHP and Perl programming languages.

Statistics
Stacks
15.5K
Stacks
142
Followers
7.7K
Followers
272
Votes
236
Votes
6
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 83
    Great with .net
  • 55
    I'm forced to use iis
  • 27
    Use nginx
  • 18
    Azure integration
  • 15
    Best for ms technologyes ms bullshit
Cons
  • 1
    Hard to set up
Pros
  • 6
    Easy set up and installation of files

What are some alternatives to Microsoft IIS, XAMPP?

NGINX

NGINX

nginx [engine x] is an HTTP and reverse proxy server, as well as a mail proxy server, written by Igor Sysoev. According to Netcraft nginx served or proxied 30.46% of the top million busiest sites in Jan 2018.

Apache HTTP Server

Apache HTTP Server

The Apache HTTP Server is a powerful and flexible HTTP/1.1 compliant web server. Originally designed as a replacement for the NCSA HTTP Server, it has grown to be the most popular web server on the Internet.

Unicorn

Unicorn

Unicorn is an HTTP server for Rack applications designed to only serve fast clients on low-latency, high-bandwidth connections and take advantage of features in Unix/Unix-like kernels. Slow clients should only be served by placing a reverse proxy capable of fully buffering both the the request and response in between Unicorn and slow clients.

Apache Tomcat

Apache Tomcat

Apache Tomcat powers numerous large-scale, mission-critical web applications across a diverse range of industries and organizations.

Passenger

Passenger

Phusion Passenger is a web server and application server, designed to be fast, robust and lightweight. It takes a lot of complexity out of deploying web apps, adds powerful enterprise-grade features that are useful in production, and makes administration much easier and less complex.

Gunicorn

Gunicorn

Gunicorn is a pre-fork worker model ported from Ruby's Unicorn project. The Gunicorn server is broadly compatible with various web frameworks, simply implemented, light on server resources, and fairly speedy.

Jetty

Jetty

Jetty is used in a wide variety of projects and products, both in development and production. Jetty can be easily embedded in devices, tools, frameworks, application servers, and clusters. See the Jetty Powered page for more uses of Jetty.

lighttpd

lighttpd

lighttpd has a very low memory footprint compared to other webservers and takes care of cpu-load. Its advanced feature-set (FastCGI, CGI, Auth, Output-Compression, URL-Rewriting and many more) make lighttpd the perfect webserver-software for every server that suffers load problems.

Swoole

Swoole

It is an open source high-performance network framework using an event-driven, asynchronous, non-blocking I/O model which makes it scalable and efficient.

Puma

Puma

Unlike other Ruby Webservers, Puma was built for speed and parallelism. Puma is a small library that provides a very fast and concurrent HTTP 1.1 server for Ruby web applications.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase