StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Databases
  4. Databases
  5. Microsoft SQL Server vs Presto

Microsoft SQL Server vs Presto

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Microsoft SQL Server
Microsoft SQL Server
Stacks21.3K
Followers15.5K
Votes540
Presto
Presto
Stacks394
Followers1.0K
Votes66

Microsoft SQL Server vs Presto: What are the differences?

Key Differences between Microsoft SQL Server and Presto

Introduction:

Microsoft SQL Server and Presto are two popular database management systems that serve different purposes in the field of data management and processing. While both platforms have their own strengths and weaknesses, there are several key differences that set them apart based on their features, architecture, and use cases.

  1. Data Processing Paradigm:

    • Microsoft SQL Server is a traditional relational database management system (RDBMS) that follows a declarative query language called Structured Query Language (SQL). It is designed to handle structured data and supports transactions, ACID properties, and data integrity.
    • On the other hand, Presto is a distributed SQL query engine that follows a more flexible and dynamic processing paradigm. It is built to handle large-scale data processing on various data sources, including both structured and unstructured data. Presto supports ANSI SQL and can query data residing in different storage systems simultaneously.
  2. Scalability and Performance:

    • SQL Server is mainly designed to work on a single server or a small cluster of servers. It provides excellent performance for transactional workloads with low latency. However, its scalability may become a bottleneck when dealing with large volumes of data or high concurrency.
    • Presto, on the other hand, is highly scalable and can handle big data workloads efficiently. It can distribute processing across multiple nodes and perform parallel query execution. This distributed architecture enables Presto to achieve high performance even when dealing with massive datasets.
  3. Data Source Support:

    • SQL Server has excellent integration with Microsoft products and supports various data formats, such as relational databases, file-based data, XML, JSON, etc. It provides a range of connectors to interact with external systems and data sources.
    • Presto is designed to work with various data sources, both structured and unstructured. It supports a wide range of connectors to interact with different file systems like Hadoop Distributed File System (HDFS), Amazon S3, Hive, Cassandra, and more. Presto can access and join data residing in different systems seamlessly.
  4. Cost and Licensing:

    • SQL Server is a commercial database management system, and its cost varies based on the edition and licensing model. Enterprises need to purchase licenses for using SQL Server, which can be a significant investment depending on the organization's scale and requirements.
    • Presto, on the other hand, is an open-source project developed and maintained by Facebook. It is available for free and can be used without any licensing fees. This makes Presto an attractive choice for organizations looking for a cost-effective solution.
  5. Query Optimizations:

    • SQL Server comes with a robust query optimizer that aims to generate efficient query execution plans based on statistics, indices, and SQL optimization techniques. It provides various tuning options and features like indexing, query hints, and execution plan analysis to improve performance.
    • Presto also has a query optimizer, but its optimizations focus more on distributed query execution. It dynamically adapts the execution plan based on the data distribution, locality, and available resources. Presto aims to minimize data transfers and optimize network communication in a distributed environment.
  6. Ecosystem Integration:

    • SQL Server has a mature ecosystem with a wide range of tools, libraries, and third-party integrations available. It provides seamless integration with Microsoft's development tools, business intelligence platforms, and cloud services like Azure. This ecosystem makes it easier to build end-to-end solutions using SQL Server.
    • Presto, being an open-source project, has an active and growing community around it. It integrates well with various big data platforms and tools like Apache Hadoop, Apache Hive, Apache Spark, etc. It can leverage the functionalities and data processing capabilities provided by these ecosystems.

In Summary, Microsoft SQL Server and Presto have significant differences in their data processing paradigms, scalability, data source support, licensing models, query optimizations, and ecosystem integration. Understanding these differences is crucial for organizations to choose the right database management system based on their specific needs and use cases.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Microsoft SQL Server, Presto

Ashish
Ashish

Tech Lead, Big Data Platform at Pinterest

Nov 27, 2019

Needs adviceonApache HiveApache HivePrestoPrestoAmazon EC2Amazon EC2

To provide employees with the critical need of interactive querying, we’ve worked with Presto, an open-source distributed SQL query engine, over the years. Operating Presto at Pinterest’s scale has involved resolving quite a few challenges like, supporting deeply nested and huge thrift schemas, slow/ bad worker detection and remediation, auto-scaling cluster, graceful cluster shutdown and impersonation support for ldap authenticator.

Our infrastructure is built on top of Amazon EC2 and we leverage Amazon S3 for storing our data. This separates compute and storage layers, and allows multiple compute clusters to share the S3 data.

We have hundreds of petabytes of data and tens of thousands of Apache Hive tables. Our Presto clusters are comprised of a fleet of 450 r4.8xl EC2 instances. Presto clusters together have over 100 TBs of memory and 14K vcpu cores. Within Pinterest, we have close to more than 1,000 monthly active users (out of total 1,600+ Pinterest employees) using Presto, who run about 400K queries on these clusters per month.

Each query submitted to Presto cluster is logged to a Kafka topic via Singer. Singer is a logging agent built at Pinterest and we talked about it in a previous post. Each query is logged when it is submitted and when it finishes. When a Presto cluster crashes, we will have query submitted events without corresponding query finished events. These events enable us to capture the effect of cluster crashes over time.

Each Presto cluster at Pinterest has workers on a mix of dedicated AWS EC2 instances and Kubernetes pods. Kubernetes platform provides us with the capability to add and remove workers from a Presto cluster very quickly. The best-case latency on bringing up a new worker on Kubernetes is less than a minute. However, when the Kubernetes cluster itself is out of resources and needs to scale up, it can take up to ten minutes. Some other advantages of deploying on Kubernetes platform is that our Presto deployment becomes agnostic of cloud vendor, instance types, OS, etc.

#BigData #AWS #DataScience #DataEngineering

3.72M views3.72M
Comments
Erin
Erin

IT Specialist

Mar 10, 2020

Needs adviceonMicrosoft SQL ServerMicrosoft SQL ServerMySQLMySQLPostgreSQLPostgreSQL

I am a Microsoft SQL Server programmer who is a bit out of practice. I have been asked to assist on a new project. The overall purpose is to organize a large number of recordings so that they can be searched. I have an enormous music library but my songs are several hours long. I need to include things like time, date and location of the recording. I don't have a problem with the general database design. I have two primary questions:

  1. I need to use either @{MySQL}|tool:1025| or @{PostgreSQL}|tool:1028| on a @{Linux}|tool:10483| based OS. Which would be better for this application?
  2. I have not dealt with a sound based data type before. How do I store that and put it in a table? Thank you.
668k views668k
Comments
Karthik
Karthik

CPO at Cantiz

Nov 5, 2019

Decided

The platform deals with time series data from sensors aggregated against things( event data that originates at periodic intervals). We use Cassandra as our distributed database to store time series data. Aggregated data insights from Cassandra is delivered as web API for consumption from other applications. Presto as a distributed sql querying engine, can provide a faster execution time provided the queries are tuned for proper distribution across the cluster. Another objective that we had was to combine Cassandra table data with other business data from RDBMS or other big data systems where presto through its connector architecture would have opened up a whole lot of options for us.

225k views225k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Microsoft SQL Server
Microsoft SQL Server
Presto
Presto

Microsoft® SQL Server is a database management and analysis system for e-commerce, line-of-business, and data warehousing solutions.

Distributed SQL Query Engine for Big Data

Statistics
Stacks
21.3K
Stacks
394
Followers
15.5K
Followers
1.0K
Votes
540
Votes
66
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 139
    Reliable and easy to use
  • 101
    High performance
  • 95
    Great with .net
  • 65
    Works well with .net
  • 56
    Easy to maintain
Cons
  • 4
    Expensive Licensing
  • 2
    Microsoft
  • 1
    Allwayon can loose data in asycronious mode
  • 1
    Replication can loose the data
  • 1
    Data pages is only 8k
Pros
  • 18
    Works directly on files in s3 (no ETL)
  • 13
    Open-source
  • 12
    Join multiple databases
  • 10
    Scalable
  • 7
    Gets ready in minutes
Integrations
No integrations available
PostgreSQL
PostgreSQL
Kafka
Kafka
Redis
Redis
MySQL
MySQL
Hadoop
Hadoop

What are some alternatives to Microsoft SQL Server, Presto?

MongoDB

MongoDB

MongoDB stores data in JSON-like documents that can vary in structure, offering a dynamic, flexible schema. MongoDB was also designed for high availability and scalability, with built-in replication and auto-sharding.

MySQL

MySQL

The MySQL software delivers a very fast, multi-threaded, multi-user, and robust SQL (Structured Query Language) database server. MySQL Server is intended for mission-critical, heavy-load production systems as well as for embedding into mass-deployed software.

PostgreSQL

PostgreSQL

PostgreSQL is an advanced object-relational database management system that supports an extended subset of the SQL standard, including transactions, foreign keys, subqueries, triggers, user-defined types and functions.

SQLite

SQLite

SQLite is an embedded SQL database engine. Unlike most other SQL databases, SQLite does not have a separate server process. SQLite reads and writes directly to ordinary disk files. A complete SQL database with multiple tables, indices, triggers, and views, is contained in a single disk file.

Cassandra

Cassandra

Partitioning means that Cassandra can distribute your data across multiple machines in an application-transparent matter. Cassandra will automatically repartition as machines are added and removed from the cluster. Row store means that like relational databases, Cassandra organizes data by rows and columns. The Cassandra Query Language (CQL) is a close relative of SQL.

Memcached

Memcached

Memcached is an in-memory key-value store for small chunks of arbitrary data (strings, objects) from results of database calls, API calls, or page rendering.

MariaDB

MariaDB

Started by core members of the original MySQL team, MariaDB actively works with outside developers to deliver the most featureful, stable, and sanely licensed open SQL server in the industry. MariaDB is designed as a drop-in replacement of MySQL(R) with more features, new storage engines, fewer bugs, and better performance.

RethinkDB

RethinkDB

RethinkDB is built to store JSON documents, and scale to multiple machines with very little effort. It has a pleasant query language that supports really useful queries like table joins and group by, and is easy to setup and learn.

ArangoDB

ArangoDB

A distributed free and open-source database with a flexible data model for documents, graphs, and key-values. Build high performance applications using a convenient SQL-like query language or JavaScript extensions.

InfluxDB

InfluxDB

InfluxDB is a scalable datastore for metrics, events, and real-time analytics. It has a built-in HTTP API so you don't have to write any server side code to get up and running. InfluxDB is designed to be scalable, simple to install and manage, and fast to get data in and out.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase