Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Microsoft Teams vs ZenHub: What are the differences?
Introduction
Microsoft Teams and ZenHub are both popular collaboration tools, but they have key differences that set them apart.
Integration with Microsoft 365 vs GitHub: Microsoft Teams integrates seamlessly with Microsoft 365, offering a wide range of productivity tools like Word, Excel, and PowerPoint. On the other hand, ZenHub is tightly integrated with GitHub, making it a preferred choice for teams working on software development projects.
Team Communication vs Project Management: While Microsoft Teams focuses on team communication through chat, video calls, and file sharing, ZenHub is primarily used for project management within GitHub. Microsoft Teams is ideal for cross-functional team collaboration, while ZenHub is more suited for teams focusing on software development workflows.
Task Management vs Issue Tracking: Microsoft Teams offers basic task management capabilities, allowing users to create and assign tasks within the platform. In contrast, ZenHub specializes in issue tracking within GitHub repositories, enabling teams to prioritize, assign, and track development issues efficiently.
Real-Time Collaboration vs Agile Planning: Microsoft Teams emphasizes real-time collaboration features like instant messaging, coauthoring documents, and live editing. ZenHub, on the other hand, focuses on agile project management practices, offering features like sprint planning, burndown charts, and release planning for software development teams.
Customizable vs GitHub-centric: Microsoft Teams provides a high level of customization with various apps, integrations, and customizable tabs to tailor the platform to your team's needs. ZenHub, being GitHub-centric, leverages the existing structure of GitHub repositories and issues, making it a seamless extension of GitHub for enhanced project management.
Security and Compliance vs Development Focus: Microsoft Teams prioritizes security and compliance with features like data encryption, compliance standards, and secure guest access. ZenHub places a strong emphasis on development-focused features like GitHub authentication, issue dependencies, and advanced reporting for GitHub repositories.
In Summary, Microsoft Teams and ZenHub offer distinct features tailored to different collaboration and project management needs, with Microsoft Teams focusing on communication and productivity, while ZenHub caters to software development teams by integrating seamlessly with GitHub for project management.
As it is the communication tool chosen for the course, our team will be using Slack to monitor the course announcements from our instructor as well as to communicate with the instructor and industry partners. The tool for communicating within the team will be Microsoft Teams. Microsoft Teams enables the team to share documents and edit them synchronously(Google Drive is not an option due to one team member's location). Since it also provides a group chat feature, we chose to use it as our communication tool to avoid using too many softwares.
Communication We have chosen two tools for our team communication.
- Slack
We choose Slack since all of us are familiar with this communication tool. We have a private channel for our team Sphinx for text messages. We added Github apps inside our private channel for repo update notifications. Furthermore, we could contact the subject matter experts within the workspace DCSIL directly for the issues we meet.
- Microsoft Teams
We use Microsoft Teams for virtual meetings for its fast connection speed. In addition, the call feature in Slack is a paid feature, and we could have virtual meetings and share screens for free in Microsoft Teams.
we were using slack
and at the same time we had a subscription with office 365. after a while we hit the slack free limitation quota. and it got annoying. the search ability was useless in free tier. and more annoying whenever you search, it opens a webpage and doesn't do it in the app.
on mobile there were many cases that I didn't get notification of important discussions. rooms was the way to separate a talk. but it become tedious. each time for a new subject that you wanted to discuss, you needed to add all the team members into a new room. and after a while the room goes silent. you will end up with a tons of not-in-use rooms that you don't want to clean up them for history purposes. also the slack UI for sub discussion is very stupid. if someone forget to check the checkbox to post the subdiscussion in the main discussion thread, other team members even won't notice such discussion is in progress.
we was paying for office 365 and thought why not give the teams a shot. we won't be in worth situation than we are. we moved to teams and we loved it instantly, we had a separate tab aggregated all the files upload. we could reply on other talk. no need of creating a new room. this way room belongs to a team and not a certain topic. our sub discussion was visible to the whole team. enjoyed integration with azure and unlimited history. the best part was integration with outlook. it was a full suit solution. our stats become busy on outlook meeting events. we get weekly analyse. we didn't need to host our wiki seperated. we've created wiki per team. the communication was much more fun.
Pros of Microsoft Teams
- Work well with the rest of Office 365 work flow29
- Mobile friendly24
- Free19
- Great integrations12
- Well-thought Design12
- Channels10
- Easy setup9
- Unlimited users6
- Strong search and data archiving5
- Easy to integrate with5
- Web interface4
- Multi domain switching support4
- Same interface on multiple platforms3
- Great voice quality2
Pros of ZenHub
- Don't have to leave github74
- No context switching, use github for everything53
- Fast and effective team support38
- Github integration36
- The board makes easier to prioritize33
- It's all about that +130
- Fair pricing model20
- Burndown charts right in github14
- Intuitive5
- Slack integration4
- Guidelines about Agile1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Microsoft Teams
- Confusing UI17
- Bad performance on init and after quite a use12
- Bad Usermanagement10
- No desktop client (only fat and slow electron app)6
- Can't see all members in a video meeting6
- Unable to Mute users5
- No Markdown Support5
- You don't really own your messages4
- MIssing public channels4
- Forced WYSIWYG4
- Stubborn, unused friendly3
- Challenging Onboarding3
- No linux support3
- Audio support problems1