Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Middleman

165
181
+ 1
62
MkDocs

65
97
+ 1
2
Add tool

Middleman vs MkDocs: What are the differences?

Developers describe Middleman as "A static site generator using all the shortcuts and tools in modern web development". Middleman is a command-line tool for creating static websites using all the shortcuts and tools of the modern web development environment. On the other hand, MkDocs is detailed as "*A static site generator *". It builds completely static HTML sites that you can host on GitHub pages, Amazon S3, or anywhere else you choose. There's a stack of good looking themes available. The built-in dev-server allows you to preview your documentation as you're writing it. It will even auto-reload and refresh your browser whenever you save your changes.

Middleman and MkDocs belong to "Static Site Generators" category of the tech stack.

Middleman is an open source tool with 6.51K GitHub stars and 698 GitHub forks. Here's a link to Middleman's open source repository on GitHub.

According to the StackShare community, Middleman has a broader approval, being mentioned in 36 company stacks & 93 developers stacks; compared to MkDocs, which is listed in 5 company stacks and 8 developer stacks.

Get Advice from developers at your company using Private StackShare. Sign up for Private StackShare.
Learn More
Pros of Middleman
Pros of MkDocs
  • 19
    Rails for static sites
  • 17
    Live reload
  • 16
    Erb, haml, slim
  • 6
    Easy setup
  • 3
    Emacs org-mode integration by middleman-org
  • 1
    Make front-end easy and rock solid again
  • 2
    Gitlab integration

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

- No public GitHub repository available -

What is Middleman?

Middleman is a command-line tool for creating static websites using all the shortcuts and tools of the modern web development environment.

What is MkDocs?

It builds completely static HTML sites that you can host on GitHub pages, Amazon S3, or anywhere else you choose. There's a stack of good looking themes available. The built-in dev-server allows you to preview your documentation as you're writing it. It will even auto-reload and refresh your browser whenever you save your changes.

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Jobs that mention Middleman and MkDocs as a desired skillset
LaunchDarkly
Oakland, California, United States
What companies use Middleman?
What companies use MkDocs?
See which teams inside your own company are using Middleman or MkDocs.
Sign up for Private StackShareLearn More

Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

What tools integrate with Middleman?
What tools integrate with MkDocs?
    No integrations found
    What are some alternatives to Middleman and MkDocs?
    Jekyll
    Think of Jekyll as a file-based CMS, without all the complexity. Jekyll takes your content, renders Markdown and Liquid templates, and spits out a complete, static website ready to be served by Apache, Nginx or another web server. Jekyll is the engine behind GitHub Pages, which you can use to host sites right from your GitHub repositories.
    Hugo
    Hugo is a static site generator written in Go. It is optimized for speed, easy use and configurability. Hugo takes a directory with content and templates and renders them into a full html website. Hugo makes use of markdown files with front matter for meta data.
    Rails
    Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.
    Gatsby
    Gatsby lets you build blazing fast sites with your data, whatever the source. Liberate your sites from legacy CMSs and fly into the future.
    Hexo
    Hexo is a fast, simple and powerful blog framework. It parses your posts with Markdown or other render engine and generates static files with the beautiful theme. All of these just take seconds.
    See all alternatives