Mina vs Rundeck: What are the differences?
Developers describe Mina as "Really fast deployer and server automation tool". Mina works really fast because it's a deploy Bash script generator. It generates an entire procedure as a Bash script and runs it remotely in the server. Compare this to the likes of Vlad or Capistrano, where each command is run separately on their own SSH sessions. Mina only creates one SSH session per deploy, minimizing the SSH connection overhead. On the other hand, Rundeck is detailed as "A platform for Self-Service Operations". A self-service operations platform used for support tasks, enterprise job scheduling, deployment, and more.
Mina and Rundeck belong to "Server Configuration and Automation" category of the tech stack.
Mina is an open source tool with 4.05K GitHub stars and 453 GitHub forks. Here's a link to Mina's open source repository on GitHub.
What is Mina?
What is Rundeck?
Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
What are the cons of using Mina?
What are the cons of using Rundeck?
Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions
What tools integrate with Mina?
We use Rundeck to handle many of our internal operations such as deployments, staging content, scheduling promotions and pushing content over our test environments.
Rundeck provides us with an extremely powerful workflow engine to perform deployments as well as an audit trail for Ansible.