1. Purpose: Monotonic is primarily focused on monitoring real-time metrics and creating dashboards to visualize the data. On the other hand, Oso is specifically designed for managing authorization logic and policies within an application.
2. Use Cases: Monotonic is commonly used in operations and DevOps teams to track and monitor performance metrics, whereas Oso is more suited for developers looking to implement fine-grained access control and authorization in their applications.
3. Integration: Monotonic integrates with various data sources and platforms to gather and display metrics, while Oso can be seamlessly integrated into existing application codebases to enforce access control policies.
4. Flexibility: Monotonic provides flexibility in defining custom dashboards and metrics based on user preferences, whereas Oso offers flexibility in defining complex access control rules and policies.
5. Learning Curve: Monotonic is relatively easy to learn and use for monitoring purposes, while Oso might have a steeper learning curve due to its advanced authorization capabilities.
6. Open Source: Monotonic is an open-source project with a community-driven development model, whereas Oso also follows an open-source approach but focuses specifically on authorization logic.

In Summary, Monotonic is tailored for real-time monitoring and dashboard creation, while Oso is specialized in providing fine-grained access control and authorization capabilities within applications.