StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Build Automation
  4. Terminal Emulators
  5. Motty vs Putty

Motty vs Putty

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Putty
Putty
Stacks182
Followers117
Votes2
Motty
Motty
Stacks1
Followers7
Votes0
GitHub Stars72
Forks4

Motty vs Putty: What are the differences?

Introduction

Motty and Putty are two popular terminal emulators that allow users to connect to remote systems and execute commands. While they may serve similar purposes, there are some key differences between them that make each one unique in its own way.

  1. User Interface: Motty provides a simple and intuitive user interface, making it easy for beginners to navigate and use. On the other hand, Putty offers a more comprehensive and advanced user interface, providing experienced users with more options and customization features.

  2. Operating System Compatibility: Motty is designed specifically for macOS, providing seamless integration with the system and optimized performance. Putty, on the other hand, is compatible with various operating systems including Windows, macOS, and Linux, making it versatile for users on different platforms.

  3. SSH Protocol Support: Motty supports the SSH (Secure Shell) protocol, allowing users to securely connect to remote systems. On the contrary, Putty not only supports SSH but also provides support for various other protocols like Telnet, Rlogin, and Serial, offering more flexibility in terms of connectivity options.

  4. File Transfer Capability: Motty does not have built-in file transfer capability, which means users need to rely on third-party tools for transferring files between local and remote systems. Putty, on the other hand, includes a file transfer client called PSCP (Putty Secure Copy), which enables users to easily transfer files securely.

  5. Session Management: Motty offers a basic session management feature, allowing users to save and load session configurations. However, Putty offers more advanced session management capabilities, enabling users to organize and categorize sessions, set automatic login, and configure specific options for each session individually.

  6. Customizability: Motty provides limited customization options, such as changing color schemes and font sizes. Putty, on the other hand, offers extensive customization features, allowing users to customize window appearance, fonts, colors, keyboard shortcuts, and other settings according to their preferences.

In summary, Motty and Putty differ in terms of user interface, operating system compatibility, supported protocols, file transfer capability, session management, and customizability. While Motty is more user-friendly and limited to macOS, Putty offers advanced features, cross-platform compatibility, support for multiple protocols, file transfer capability, extensive session management options, and high customizability.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Putty
Putty
Motty
Motty

It is an SSH and telnet client, developed originally by Simon Tatham for the Windows platform. It is open source software that is available with source code and is developed and supported by a group of volunteers.

Motty provides the simpler way to test your client services. It is a web application that gives you ability to create your own custom responses, so you can intuitively and easily mock http responses.

SSH client
Easy to use; Simple to install
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
72
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
4
Stacks
182
Stacks
1
Followers
117
Followers
7
Votes
2
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 1
    More popular
  • 1
    Free
No community feedback yet

What are some alternatives to Putty, Motty?

Postman

Postman

It is the only complete API development environment, used by nearly five million developers and more than 100,000 companies worldwide.

Paw

Paw

Paw is a full-featured and beautifully designed Mac app that makes interaction with REST services delightful. Either you are an API maker or consumer, Paw helps you build HTTP requests, inspect the server's response and even generate client code.

Karate DSL

Karate DSL

Combines API test-automation, mocks and performance-testing into a single, unified framework. The BDD syntax popularized by Cucumber is language-neutral, and easy for even non-programmers. Besides powerful JSON & XML assertions, you can run tests in parallel for speed - which is critical for HTTP API testing.

Appwrite

Appwrite

Appwrite's open-source platform lets you add Auth, DBs, Functions and Storage to your product and build any application at any scale, own your data, and use your preferred coding languages and tools.

Runscope

Runscope

Keep tabs on all aspects of your API's performance with uptime monitoring, integration testing, logging and real-time monitoring.

Insomnia REST Client

Insomnia REST Client

Insomnia is a powerful REST API Client with cookie management, environment variables, code generation, and authentication for Mac, Window, and Linux.

RAML

RAML

RESTful API Modeling Language (RAML) makes it easy to manage the whole API lifecycle from design to sharing. It's concise - you only write what you need to define - and reusable. It is machine readable API design that is actually human friendly.

Apigee

Apigee

API management, design, analytics, and security are at the heart of modern digital architecture. The Apigee intelligent API platform is a complete solution for moving business to the digital world.

Hoppscotch

Hoppscotch

It is a free, fast and beautiful API request builder. It helps you create requests faster, saving precious time on development

Falcor

Falcor

Falcor lets you represent all your remote data sources as a single domain model via a virtual JSON graph. You code the same way no matter where the data is, whether in memory on the client or over the network on the server.

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope