Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

MQTT

592
570
+ 1
7
Protobuf

2.6K
380
+ 1
0
Add tool

MQTT vs Protobuf: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this article, we will discuss the key differences between MQTT and Protobuf. Both MQTT (Message Queuing Telemetry Transport) and Protobuf (Protocol Buffers) are commonly used technologies for messaging and data serialization, respectively.

  1. Message Exchange Model: MQTT is a publish-subscribe messaging protocol, where publishers send messages to a central message broker, and subscribers receive messages from the broker based on their subscribed topics. On the other hand, Protobuf is a data serialization format that allows structuring and transmitting data in an efficient and compact manner.

  2. Data Representation: MQTT focuses on the exchange of lightweight messages, which are typically textual or binary payloads. On the other hand, Protobuf is more concerned with the structure and definition of data objects using a schema, allowing for strong typing and data validation.

  3. Transport Protocol: MQTT is a transport protocol itself, built on top of TCP/IP, making it suitable for low-power devices and unreliable network connections. Protobuf, on the other hand, is a data serialization format that can be used over various transport protocols such as TCP/IP, HTTP, or even local interprocess communication.

  4. Flexibility and Extensibility: MQTT provides a simple and lightweight protocol for messaging, allowing for easy implementation and interoperability between different devices and platforms. Protobuf, on the other hand, provides a more flexible and extensible data serialization format, allowing for the addition or modification of fields in a backward-compatible manner.

  5. Efficiency and Speed: MQTT is designed for efficient and lightweight message exchange, making it suitable for resource-constrained devices and networks. Protobuf, on the other hand, focuses on efficient data serialization, providing a compact binary format and efficient encoding/decoding mechanisms, leading to faster processing and reduced data size.

  6. Language Support: MQTT has broad language support, with client libraries available for various programming languages like Java, Python, C++, etc. Protobuf, on the other hand, also has language bindings for multiple programming languages, making it easy to integrate into different projects.

In summary, MQTT is a lightweight publish-subscribe messaging protocol focused on efficient message exchange, while Protobuf is a data serialization format that enables structured and efficient transmission of data. MQTT is more suitable for messaging scenarios, while Protobuf is ideal for applications that require data serialization and efficient encoding.

Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of MQTT
Pros of Protobuf
  • 3
    Varying levels of Quality of Service to fit a range of
  • 2
    Lightweight with a relatively small data footprint
  • 2
    Very easy to configure and use with open source tools
    Be the first to leave a pro

    Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

    Cons of MQTT
    Cons of Protobuf
    • 1
      Easy to configure in an unsecure manner
      Be the first to leave a con

      Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

      - No public GitHub repository available -

      What is MQTT?

      It was designed as an extremely lightweight publish/subscribe messaging transport. It is useful for connections with remote locations where a small code footprint is required and/or network bandwidth is at a premium.

      What is Protobuf?

      Protocol buffers are Google's language-neutral, platform-neutral, extensible mechanism for serializing structured data – think XML, but smaller, faster, and simpler.

      Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

      What companies use MQTT?
      What companies use Protobuf?
      See which teams inside your own company are using MQTT or Protobuf.
      Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn More

      Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

      What tools integrate with MQTT?
      What tools integrate with Protobuf?

      Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

      Blog Posts

      Jun 6 2019 at 5:11PM

      AppSignal

      RedisRubyKafka+9
      15
      1639
      What are some alternatives to MQTT and Protobuf?
      RabbitMQ
      RabbitMQ gives your applications a common platform to send and receive messages, and your messages a safe place to live until received.
      REST
      An architectural style for developing web services. A distributed system framework that uses Web protocols and technologies.
      XMPP
      It is a set of open technologies for instant messaging, presence, multi-party chat, voice and video calls, collaboration, lightweight middleware, content syndication, and generalized routing of XML data.
      Google Cloud Messaging
      Google Cloud Messaging (GCM) is a free service that enables developers to send messages between servers and client apps. This includes downstream messages from servers to client apps, and upstream messages from client apps to servers.
      Kafka
      Kafka is a distributed, partitioned, replicated commit log service. It provides the functionality of a messaging system, but with a unique design.
      See all alternatives