StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Build Automation
  4. Package Managers
  5. MyGet vs ProGet

MyGet vs ProGet

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

ProGet
ProGet
Stacks17
Followers6
Votes0
MyGet
MyGet
Stacks17
Followers9
Votes0

MyGet vs ProGet: What are the differences?

  1. License Model: MyGet offers a subscription-based licensing model, whereas ProGet provides a perpetual licensing model costing a one-time fee.
  2. Package Management: MyGet focuses on hosted package management services, allowing users to build and manage packages in the cloud, whereas ProGet is an on-premise package management system that enables organizations to host and manage their packages locally.
  3. Integration with CI/CD Tools: MyGet has built-in integration with popular CI/CD tools like Jenkins, TeamCity, and Azure DevOps, facilitating seamless automation, while ProGet offers plugin support for CI/CD tools to enable integration, giving users more flexibility in their tool choices.
  4. Visibility and Collaboration: MyGet emphasizes visibility and collaboration by providing features like package sharing, public feeds, and access control to foster teamwork among developers, whereas ProGet focuses more on security and access control, ensuring that packages are only accessible to authorized users.
  5. Support for Multiple Platforms: MyGet primarily supports NuGet, npm, Bower, and VSIX packages, catering to a wider range of development platforms, while ProGet has broader support for various package types, including NuGet, Chocolatey, Docker, and RubyGems, making it suitable for diverse development environments.
  6. Scalability and Performance: MyGet is optimized for scalability and performance in the cloud, offering automatic scaling and fast package resolution, whereas ProGet is designed for scalability on-premise, allowing users to manage their own hardware and infrastructure for optimal performance.

In Summary, MyGet focuses on providing a cloud-based subscription model with emphasis on collaboration and support for multiple platforms, while ProGet offers an on-premise perpetual licensing model with a focus on security, scalability, and broader support for various package types.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

ProGet
ProGet
MyGet
MyGet

It allows users to host and manage personal or enterprise-wide packages, applications, and components. It was originally designed as a private NuGet manager and symbol and source server.

It allows you to create and host your own NuGet feed. Include packages from the official NuGet feed or upload your own NuGet packages. We can also compile and package your source code from GitHub, BitBucket, CodePlex and more!

Share pre-built and pre-tested code; Scan and Validate Open-source Packages
All your packages in a single endpoint; Continuous Integration: Build Services; Continuous Security: Vulnerability Scanning; Package Dependency Management; Cloud Native & Enterprise Scale; Secure by Design
Statistics
Stacks
17
Stacks
17
Followers
6
Followers
9
Votes
0
Votes
0
Integrations
Linux
Linux
NuGet
NuGet
Microsoft SQL Server
Microsoft SQL Server
PHP
PHP
npm
npm
Apache Maven
Apache Maven
Bower
Bower
Python
Python
NuGet
NuGet

What are some alternatives to ProGet, MyGet?

Meteor

Meteor

A Meteor application is a mix of JavaScript that runs inside a client web browser, JavaScript that runs on the Meteor server inside a Node.js container, and all the supporting HTML fragments, CSS rules, and static assets.

Bower

Bower

Bower is a package manager for the web. It offers a generic, unopinionated solution to the problem of front-end package management, while exposing the package dependency model via an API that can be consumed by a more opinionated build stack. There are no system wide dependencies, no dependencies are shared between different apps, and the dependency tree is flat.

Elm

Elm

Writing HTML apps is super easy with elm-lang/html. Not only does it render extremely fast, it also quietly guides you towards well-architected code.

Julia

Julia

Julia is a high-level, high-performance dynamic programming language for technical computing, with syntax that is familiar to users of other technical computing environments. It provides a sophisticated compiler, distributed parallel execution, numerical accuracy, and an extensive mathematical function library.

Racket

Racket

It is a general-purpose, multi-paradigm programming language based on the Scheme dialect of Lisp. It is designed to be a platform for programming language design and implementation. It is also used for scripting, computer science education, and research.

PureScript

PureScript

A small strongly typed programming language with expressive types that compiles to JavaScript, written in and inspired by Haskell.

Composer

Composer

It is a tool for dependency management in PHP. It allows you to declare the libraries your project depends on and it will manage (install/update) them for you.

pnpm

pnpm

It uses hard links and symlinks to save one version of a module only ever once on a disk. When using npm or Yarn for example, if you have 100 projects using the same version of lodash, you will have 100 copies of lodash on disk. With pnpm, lodash will be saved in a single place on the disk and a hard link will put it into the node_modules where it should be installed.

Bun

Bun

Develop, test, run, and bundle JavaScript & TypeScript projects—all with Bun. Bun is an all-in-one JavaScript runtime & toolkit designed for speed, complete with a bundler, test runner, and Node.js-compatible package manager.

Homebrew

Homebrew

Homebrew installs the stuff you need that Apple didn’t. Homebrew installs packages to their own directory and then symlinks their files into /usr/local.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana