StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Platform as a Service
  4. Platform As A Service
  5. NATS vs OpenShift

NATS vs OpenShift

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Stacks1.6K
Followers1.4K
Votes517
GitHub Stars885
Forks510
NATS
NATS
Stacks394
Followers498
Votes60

NATS vs OpenShift: What are the differences?

Introduction:

NATS and OpenShift are both popular technologies used in the development of web applications. While they serve different purposes, there are key differences between the two that are worth considering when choosing the appropriate technology for your project.

  1. Architecture: NATS is a lightweight, high-performance messaging system designed for building distributed systems. It follows a publish-subscribe pattern, where messages are sent to multiple subscribers. On the other hand, OpenShift is a cloud container platform that provides a complete environment to develop, deploy, and manage applications. It focuses on container orchestration using technologies like Kubernetes.

  2. Scaling: NATS allows for transparent scaling, where new instances can be added to handle increased message traffic. It supports horizontal scaling by adding more servers to handle the load. OpenShift also supports horizontal scaling, but it follows a different approach. It uses Kubernetes' scaling mechanisms to manage scaling of containers based on resource utilization.

  3. Security: NATS provides support for secure communication through TLS encryption, authentication, and authorization mechanisms. It ensures message privacy and integrity. OpenShift, on the other hand, provides security features such as access control, container isolation, and network policies to secure applications running on the platform.

  4. Ease of Deployment: NATS is relatively easy to deploy and manage due to its lightweight nature. It can be run as a standalone server or as a cluster, depending on the scalability requirements. OpenShift, being a robust container platform, requires more configuration and setup to deploy and manage applications. It provides additional features like continuous integration/continuous deployment (CI/CD) pipelines and automated scaling.

  5. Supported Languages: NATS provides client libraries for a wide range of programming languages, including Go, Python, Java, JavaScript, and more. This makes it versatile and accessible to developers from different language backgrounds. OpenShift, being a platform for deploying containerized applications, supports any programming language as long as it can run inside a container.

  6. Community and Ecosystem: NATS has a growing open-source community and a dedicated ecosystem of tools and frameworks built around it. It benefits from the active contributions and collaborations of developers. OpenShift, being an open-source project itself, has a robust community and a rich ecosystem of extensions, plugins, and integrations supporting a wide range of deployment scenarios.

In summary, NATS is a lightweight messaging system focused on high-performance communication and scaling, while OpenShift is a comprehensive platform for developing, deploying, and managing containerized applications with additional features like security, scalability, and integration with Kubernetes. Both technologies have their strengths and can be chosen based on the specific requirements of a project.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
NATS
NATS

OpenShift is Red Hat's Cloud Computing Platform as a Service (PaaS) offering. OpenShift is an application platform in the cloud where application developers and teams can build, test, deploy, and run their applications.

Unlike traditional enterprise messaging systems, NATS has an always-on dial tone that does whatever it takes to remain available. This forms a great base for building modern, reliable, and scalable cloud and distributed systems.

Built-in support for Node.js, Ruby, Python, PHP, Perl, and Java (the standard in today's Enterprise);OpenShift is extensible with a customizable cartridge functionality that allows developers to add any other language they wish. We've seen everything from Clojure to Cobol running on OpenShift;OpenShift supports frameworks ranging from Spring, to Rails, to Play;Autoscaling- OpenShift can scale your application by adding additional instances of your application and enabling clustering. Alternatively, you can manually scale the amount of resources with which your application is deployed when needed;OpenShift by Red Hat is built on open-source technologies (Red Hat Enterprise Linux- RHEL);One Click Deployment- Deploying to the OpenShift platform is as easy a clicking a button or entering a "Git push" command
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
885
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
510
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
1.6K
Stacks
394
Followers
1.4K
Followers
498
Votes
517
Votes
60
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 99
    Good free plan
  • 63
    Open Source
  • 47
    Easy setup
  • 43
    Nodejs support
  • 42
    Well documented
Cons
  • 2
    Decisions are made for you, limiting your options
  • 2
    License cost
  • 1
    Behind, sometimes severely, the upstreams
Pros
  • 22
    Fastest pub-sub system out there
  • 16
    Rock solid
  • 12
    Easy to grasp
  • 4
    Light-weight
  • 4
    Easy, Fast, Secure
Cons
  • 2
    Persistence with Jetstream supported
  • 1
    No Order
  • 1
    No Persistence

What are some alternatives to Red Hat OpenShift, NATS?

Heroku

Heroku

Heroku is a cloud application platform – a new way of building and deploying web apps. Heroku lets app developers spend 100% of their time on their application code, not managing servers, deployment, ongoing operations, or scaling.

Firebase

Firebase

Firebase is a cloud service designed to power real-time, collaborative applications. Simply add the Firebase library to your application to gain access to a shared data structure; any changes you make to that data are automatically synchronized with the Firebase cloud and with other clients within milliseconds.

Clever Cloud

Clever Cloud

Clever Cloud is a polyglot cloud application platform. The service helps developers to build applications with many languages and services, with auto-scaling features and a true pay-as-you-go pricing model.

Socket.IO

Socket.IO

It enables real-time bidirectional event-based communication. It works on every platform, browser or device, focusing equally on reliability and speed.

Google App Engine

Google App Engine

Google has a reputation for highly reliable, high performance infrastructure. With App Engine you can take advantage of the 10 years of knowledge Google has in running massively scalable, performance driven systems. App Engine applications are easy to build, easy to maintain, and easy to scale as your traffic and data storage needs grow.

AWS Elastic Beanstalk

AWS Elastic Beanstalk

Once you upload your application, Elastic Beanstalk automatically handles the deployment details of capacity provisioning, load balancing, auto-scaling, and application health monitoring.

PubNub

PubNub

PubNub makes it easy for you to add real-time capabilities to your apps, without worrying about the infrastructure. Build apps that allow your users to engage in real-time across mobile, browser, desktop and server.

Pusher

Pusher

Pusher is the category leader in delightful APIs for app developers building communication and collaboration features.

Render

Render

Render is a unified platform to build and run all your apps and websites with free SSL, a global CDN, private networks and auto deploys from Git.

SignalR

SignalR

SignalR allows bi-directional communication between server and client. Servers can now push content to connected clients instantly as it becomes available. SignalR supports Web Sockets, and falls back to other compatible techniques for older browsers. SignalR includes APIs for connection management (for instance, connect and disconnect events), grouping connections, and authorization.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase