Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Netflix OSS

75
142
+ 1
0
Ocelot

76
279
+ 1
2
Add tool

Netflix OSS vs Ocelot: What are the differences?

Introduction

Netflix OSS and Ocelot are two popular options for building microservices architectures and implementing API gateways. While they serve similar purposes, there are key differences between them that set them apart. This markdown code will outline six specific differences between Netflix OSS and Ocelot, providing a concise comparison for website usage.

  1. Configuration: Netflix OSS relies on a centralized configuration model where configuration files are stored in a central repository, such as a GitHub repository. On the other hand, Ocelot provides a decentralized configuration approach where each microservice has its own configuration file, making it easier to manage and update configurations independently.

  2. Integration with Ecosystem: Netflix OSS is tightly integrated with the Netflix ecosystem and other tools like Eureka for service discovery and Hystrix for circuit breaking. Ocelot, on the other hand, is designed to work well with the .NET ecosystem and integrates easily with technologies like Identity Server for authentication and authorization.

  3. Extensibility: Netflix OSS provides a wide range of built-in components and plugins that can be used to enhance functionality, such as rate limiting, request/response logging, and security. Ocelot, on the other hand, allows developers to create custom middleware components using the .NET Core middleware pipeline, offering greater flexibility and extensibility.

  4. Community Support: Netflix OSS has a large and active community with extensive documentation, tutorials, and community support available. Ocelot, being a relatively newer project, has a smaller community in comparison but is growing steadily, with a dedicated core team contributing to its development.

  5. Programming Language: Netflix OSS is primarily implemented in Java and supports multiple programming languages for microservices development. Ocelot, on the other hand, is a .NET Core-specific library that predominantly caters to the Microsoft development stack, including C#, F#, and VB.NET.

  6. Maturity and Adoption: Netflix OSS has been widely adopted and used by numerous large-scale organizations, proving its stability and maturity. Ocelot, being a younger project, is still gaining traction but has shown promise and is suitable for smaller to medium-scale projects.

In summary, Netflix OSS and Ocelot differ in their configuration approach, ecosystem integration, extensibility, community support, programming language compatibility, and maturity/adoption level. Both options have their strengths and are suited for different use cases and development stacks.

Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of Netflix OSS
Pros of Ocelot
    Be the first to leave a pro
    • 1
      Straightforward documentation
    • 1
      Simple configuration

    Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

    No Stats
    - No public GitHub repository available -

    What is Netflix OSS?

    It provides tools and services to get the most out of your (big) data. It also provides runtime containers, libraries and services that power microservices.

    What is Ocelot?

    It is aimed at people using .NET running a micro services / service oriented architecture that need a unified point of entry into their system. However it will work with anything that speaks HTTP and run on any platform that ASP.NET Core supports. It manipulates the HttpRequest object into a state specified by its configuration until it reaches a request builder middleware where it creates a HttpRequestMessage object which is used to make a request to a downstream service.

    Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

    What companies use Netflix OSS?
    What companies use Ocelot?
    See which teams inside your own company are using Netflix OSS or Ocelot.
    Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn More

    Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

    What tools integrate with Netflix OSS?
    What tools integrate with Ocelot?
      No integrations found
      What are some alternatives to Netflix OSS and Ocelot?
      Kubernetes
      Kubernetes is an open source orchestration system for Docker containers. It handles scheduling onto nodes in a compute cluster and actively manages workloads to ensure that their state matches the users declared intentions.
      Istio
      Istio is an open platform for providing a uniform way to integrate microservices, manage traffic flow across microservices, enforce policies and aggregate telemetry data. Istio's control plane provides an abstraction layer over the underlying cluster management platform, such as Kubernetes, Mesos, etc.
      Spring Cloud
      It provides tools for developers to quickly build some of the common patterns in distributed systems.
      Docker
      The Docker Platform is the industry-leading container platform for continuous, high-velocity innovation, enabling organizations to seamlessly build and share any application — from legacy to what comes next — and securely run them anywhere
      Cloud Foundry
      Cloud Foundry is an open platform as a service (PaaS) that provides a choice of clouds, developer frameworks, and application services. Cloud Foundry makes it faster and easier to build, test, deploy, and scale applications.
      See all alternatives