StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Container Registry
  4. Container Tools
  5. Netflix OSS vs RailCar

Netflix OSS vs RailCar

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Netflix OSS
Netflix OSS
Stacks76
Followers145
Votes0
RailCar
RailCar
Stacks0
Followers4
Votes0
GitHub Stars1.1K
Forks101

Netflix OSS vs RailCar: What are the differences?

# Introduction
Key differences between Netflix OSS and RailCar are outlined below.

1. **Service Discovery**: Netflix OSS relies on tools like Eureka for service discovery, while RailCar uses Consul as its service discovery tool.
2. **Container Orchestration**: Netflix OSS utilizes tools like Apache Mesos or AWS ECS for container orchestration, whereas RailCar leverages Kubernetes for seamless and efficient container management.
3. **Polyglot Architecture Support**: Netflix OSS supports various programming languages and frameworks, making it compatible with a wide range of technologies. On the other hand, RailCar is more focused on supporting applications built on the Rust programming language.
4. **Client-Side Load Balancing**: Netflix OSS provides client-side load balancing through tools like Ribbon, enabling applications to distribute traffic efficiently. RailCar, however, utilizes Envoy Proxy for robust client-side load balancing capabilities.
5. **Fault Tolerance Mechanisms**: Netflix OSS incorporates tools like Hystrix for implementing fault tolerance mechanisms in microservices, ensuring high availability and reliability. RailCar, on the other hand, relies on built-in Rust language features for fault tolerance and error handling within applications.
6. **Monitoring and Metrics**: Netflix OSS offers monitoring and metrics capabilities through tools like Atlas and Spectator, allowing real-time insights into system performance. In contrast, RailCar integrates with Prometheus for monitoring and metrics, providing detailed visibility into the application's behavior and resource usage.

In Summary, Netflix OSS and RailCar differ in service discovery solutions, container orchestration platforms, language support, load balancing mechanisms, fault tolerance implementations, and monitoring frameworks. Each platform caters to distinct needs and preferences in the realm of microservices architecture.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Netflix OSS
Netflix OSS
RailCar
RailCar

It provides tools and services to get the most out of your (big) data. It also provides runtime containers, libraries and services that power microservices.

railcar is a rust implementation of the opencontainers initiative's runtime spec. It is similar to the reference implementation runc, but it is implemented completely in rust for memory safety without needing the overhead of a garbage collector or multiple threads.

Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
1.1K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
101
Stacks
76
Stacks
0
Followers
145
Followers
4
Votes
0
Votes
0
Integrations
No integrations available
Docker
Docker

What are some alternatives to Netflix OSS, RailCar?

Kubernetes

Kubernetes

Kubernetes is an open source orchestration system for Docker containers. It handles scheduling onto nodes in a compute cluster and actively manages workloads to ensure that their state matches the users declared intentions.

Rancher

Rancher

Rancher is an open source container management platform that includes full distributions of Kubernetes, Apache Mesos and Docker Swarm, and makes it simple to operate container clusters on any cloud or infrastructure platform.

Docker Compose

Docker Compose

With Compose, you define a multi-container application in a single file, then spin your application up in a single command which does everything that needs to be done to get it running.

Docker Swarm

Docker Swarm

Swarm serves the standard Docker API, so any tool which already communicates with a Docker daemon can use Swarm to transparently scale to multiple hosts: Dokku, Compose, Krane, Deis, DockerUI, Shipyard, Drone, Jenkins... and, of course, the Docker client itself.

Tutum

Tutum

Tutum lets developers easily manage and run lightweight, portable, self-sufficient containers from any application. AWS-like control, Heroku-like ease. The same container that a developer builds and tests on a laptop can run at scale in Tutum.

Portainer

Portainer

It is a universal container management tool. It works with Kubernetes, Docker, Docker Swarm and Azure ACI. It allows you to manage containers without needing to know platform-specific code.

Istio

Istio

Istio is an open platform for providing a uniform way to integrate microservices, manage traffic flow across microservices, enforce policies and aggregate telemetry data. Istio's control plane provides an abstraction layer over the underlying cluster management platform, such as Kubernetes, Mesos, etc.

Codefresh

Codefresh

Automate and parallelize testing. Codefresh allows teams to spin up on-demand compositions to run unit and integration tests as part of the continuous integration process. Jenkins integration allows more complex pipelines.

Azure Service Fabric

Azure Service Fabric

Azure Service Fabric is a distributed systems platform that makes it easy to package, deploy, and manage scalable and reliable microservices. Service Fabric addresses the significant challenges in developing and managing cloud apps.

CAST.AI

CAST.AI

It is an AI-driven cloud optimization platform for Kubernetes. Instantly cut your cloud bill, prevent downtime, and 10X the power of DevOps.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana