Quasar Framework vs new.css: What are the differences?

Introduction

1. Component Library vs. Utility Library:

Quasar Framework is a comprehensive component library that provides a wide range of pre-designed UI components for web development, while new.css is a minimalist utility-first CSS library that focuses on providing basic styling classes for rapid prototyping and simple projects.

2. Customization Options:

Quasar Framework offers extensive customization options, allowing developers to easily theme and style components according to their project requirements. In contrast, new.css has limited customization options and is designed to be used as is without much alteration.

3. Technology Stack:

Quasar Framework is built on top of Vue.js and provides a robust ecosystem for Vue developers, including tools for building both web and mobile applications. On the other hand, new.css is a standalone CSS library that can be used with any frontend framework or vanilla HTML projects.

4. File Size:

Due to its comprehensive nature, Quasar Framework tends to have a larger file size compared to new.css, which is a lightweight library designed for small projects where file size is a concern.

5. Community and Support:

Quasar Framework has a large and active community of developers, extensive documentation, and support resources, making it easier for developers to find help and resources. In contrast, new.css, being a newer and more niche library, may have a smaller community and fewer resources available for support.

6. Project Complexity:

Quasar Framework is suitable for complex, feature-rich applications that require a wide range of UI components and functionalities. In contrast, new.css is more suitable for simple and lightweight projects where rapid prototyping and minimal design are key priorities.

In Summary, Quasar Framework and new.css differ in terms of component library vs. utility library, customization options, technology stack, file size, community and support, and project complexity.