StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Platform as a Service
  4. Web Servers
  5. Varnish vs nginx

Varnish vs nginx

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

NGINX
NGINX
Stacks115.0K
Followers61.9K
Votes5.5K
GitHub Stars28.4K
Forks7.6K
Varnish
Varnish
Stacks12.6K
Followers2.7K
Votes370
GitHub Stars887
Forks195

Varnish vs nginx: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this Markdown document, we will discuss the key differences between Varnish and Nginx. Both Varnish and Nginx are popular open-source web servers that are used to improve website performance and handle high traffic. Despite having some similar features, there are several distinct differences between these two servers.

  1. Caching Mechanism: Varnish is primarily designed as a caching HTTP reverse proxy, whereas Nginx is a versatile web server that can support various functionalities including caching. Varnish stores a copy of the requested web page in memory, which allows it to serve subsequent requests directly from the cache without hitting the backend server. On the other hand, Nginx employs an on-disk caching mechanism that stores frequently accessed files on the file system for faster delivery.

  2. Performance: Varnish is renowned for its exceptional performance and efficiency in handling high volumes of traffic. It is specifically designed to deliver content quickly by utilizing its advanced caching capabilities. Nginx also performs well, but when it comes to handling heavy loads and serving static content, Varnish outshines Nginx due to its specialized caching architecture.

  3. Flexibility and Versatility: Nginx offers more flexibility and versatility compared to Varnish. While Varnish is mainly focused on caching and enhancing performance, Nginx is a full-fledged web server that supports a broad range of functionalities such as load balancing, SSL/TLS termination, proxying, and more. Nginx can act both as a caching proxy server and a regular web server, making it a more adaptable choice for different use cases.

  4. Configuration Language: Varnish uses its own domain-specific language called VCL (Varnish Configuration Language) for configuration, which is specific to Varnish and requires learning a new syntax. On the other hand, Nginx utilizes a more familiar and widely-used configuration syntax based on the NGINX.conf file, which makes it easier for users familiar with web server configurations.

  5. SSL/TLS Termination: Nginx has built-in support for SSL/TLS termination, allowing it to handle encrypted web traffic directly. In contrast, Varnish lacks native SSL/TLS termination functionality and typically requires an additional web server (like Nginx or Apache) to handle the SSL/TLS encryption. This additional layer can introduce some overhead and potentially impact performance.

  6. Rewriting and Redirects: Nginx provides more advanced and flexible options for URL rewriting and redirects. It offers a robust and powerful rewriting module that enables complex URL manipulation, including regular expression-based rewriting. Varnish also supports basic URL rewriting but doesn't provide the same level of flexibility and functionality as Nginx in this regard.

In summary, Varnish and Nginx differ in their primary focus, performance capabilities, versatility, configuration language, SSL/TLS termination support, and URL rewriting functionalities. While Varnish excels in caching and handling heavy traffic, Nginx offers more flexibility and a broader range of features. The choice between Varnish and Nginx ultimately depends on specific requirements and the intended use case of the web server.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on NGINX, Varnish

greg00m
greg00m

Mar 9, 2020

Needs advice

I am diving into web development, both front and back end. I feel comfortable with administration, scripting and moderate coding in bash, Python and C++, but I am also a Windows fan (i love inner conflict). What are the votes on web servers? IIS is expensive and restrictive (has Windows adoption of open source changed this?) Apache has the history but seems to be at the root of most of my Infosec issues, and I know nothing about nginx (is it too new to rely on?). And no, I don't know what I want to do on the web explicitly, but hosting and data storage (both cloud and tape) are possibilities.
Ready, aim fire!

766k views766k
Comments
jlp78
jlp78

May 31, 2019

ReviewonNGINXNGINX

I use nginx because it is very light weight. Where Apache tries to include everything in the web server, nginx opts to have external programs/facilities take care of that so the web server can focus on efficiently serving web pages. While this can seem inefficient, it limits the number of new bugs found in the web server, which is the element that faces the client most directly.

727k views727k
Comments
StackShare
StackShare

May 29, 2019

Needs advice

From a StackShare Community member: "We are a LAMP shop currently focused on improving web performance for our customers. We have made many front-end optimizations and now we are considering replacing Apache with nginx. I was wondering if others saw a noticeable performance gain or any other benefits by switching."

725k views725k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

NGINX
NGINX
Varnish
Varnish

nginx [engine x] is an HTTP and reverse proxy server, as well as a mail proxy server, written by Igor Sysoev. According to Netcraft nginx served or proxied 30.46% of the top million busiest sites in Jan 2018.

Varnish Cache is a web application accelerator also known as a caching HTTP reverse proxy. You install it in front of any server that speaks HTTP and configure it to cache the contents. Varnish Cache is really, really fast. It typically speeds up delivery with a factor of 300 - 1000x, depending on your architecture.

-
Powerful, feature-rich web cache;HTTP accelerator; Speed up the performance of your website and streaming services
Statistics
GitHub Stars
28.4K
GitHub Stars
887
GitHub Forks
7.6K
GitHub Forks
195
Stacks
115.0K
Stacks
12.6K
Followers
61.9K
Followers
2.7K
Votes
5.5K
Votes
370
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 1453
    High-performance http server
  • 895
    Performance
  • 730
    Easy to configure
  • 607
    Open source
  • 530
    Load balancer
Cons
  • 10
    Advanced features require subscription
Pros
  • 104
    High-performance
  • 67
    Very Fast
  • 57
    Very Stable
  • 44
    Very Robust
  • 37
    HTTP reverse proxy

What are some alternatives to NGINX, Varnish?

Apache HTTP Server

Apache HTTP Server

The Apache HTTP Server is a powerful and flexible HTTP/1.1 compliant web server. Originally designed as a replacement for the NCSA HTTP Server, it has grown to be the most popular web server on the Internet.

Unicorn

Unicorn

Unicorn is an HTTP server for Rack applications designed to only serve fast clients on low-latency, high-bandwidth connections and take advantage of features in Unix/Unix-like kernels. Slow clients should only be served by placing a reverse proxy capable of fully buffering both the the request and response in between Unicorn and slow clients.

Microsoft IIS

Microsoft IIS

Internet Information Services (IIS) for Windows Server is a flexible, secure and manageable Web server for hosting anything on the Web. From media streaming to web applications, IIS's scalable and open architecture is ready to handle the most demanding tasks.

Apache Tomcat

Apache Tomcat

Apache Tomcat powers numerous large-scale, mission-critical web applications across a diverse range of industries and organizations.

Passenger

Passenger

Phusion Passenger is a web server and application server, designed to be fast, robust and lightweight. It takes a lot of complexity out of deploying web apps, adds powerful enterprise-grade features that are useful in production, and makes administration much easier and less complex.

Gunicorn

Gunicorn

Gunicorn is a pre-fork worker model ported from Ruby's Unicorn project. The Gunicorn server is broadly compatible with various web frameworks, simply implemented, light on server resources, and fairly speedy.

Section

Section

Edge Compute Platform gives Dev and Ops engineers the access and control they need to run compute workloads on a distributed edge.

Jetty

Jetty

Jetty is used in a wide variety of projects and products, both in development and production. Jetty can be easily embedded in devices, tools, frameworks, application servers, and clusters. See the Jetty Powered page for more uses of Jetty.

lighttpd

lighttpd

lighttpd has a very low memory footprint compared to other webservers and takes care of cpu-load. Its advanced feature-set (FastCGI, CGI, Auth, Output-Compression, URL-Rewriting and many more) make lighttpd the perfect webserver-software for every server that suffers load problems.

Swoole

Swoole

It is an open source high-performance network framework using an event-driven, asynchronous, non-blocking I/O model which makes it scalable and efficient.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot