StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Cross Platform Desktop Development
  5. NodeGUI vs wxWidgets

NodeGUI vs wxWidgets

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

wxWidgets
wxWidgets
Stacks21
Followers75
Votes19
GitHub Stars6.9K
Forks1.9K
NodeGUI
NodeGUI
Stacks15
Followers109
Votes6
GitHub Stars9.1K
Forks308

NodeGUI vs wxWidgets: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this analysis, we will compare NodeGUI and wxWidgets, highlighting the key differences between the two frameworks.

  1. Platform-specific nature: NodeGUI is a JavaScript framework that allows for building native desktop applications using web technologies. It uses Node.js, Chromium, and Qt under the hood to provide cross-platform compatibility. On the other hand, wxWidgets is a C++ library that enables developers to create native applications for multiple platforms such as Windows, macOS, and Linux using a unified API.

  2. Programming language: NodeGUI primarily uses JavaScript for application development, making it more accessible to web developers who are already familiar with the language. In contrast, wxWidgets requires knowledge of C++ as it is a C++ library, which may have a steeper learning curve for developers who are not well-versed in C++.

  3. Development approach: NodeGUI follows a declarative approach, similar to web development, where the application's UI is described using a layout engine and styled using Cascading Style Sheets (CSS). This allows for easier and more flexible UI development. On the other hand, wxWidgets follows an imperative approach, where the UI is programmatically constructed using C++ code. This gives developers more control over the UI elements and their behavior.

  4. Integration with existing web technologies: NodeGUI leverages web technologies like HTML, CSS, and JavaScript, making it easier to reuse existing web components and libraries in the desktop application. This can significantly speed up development and enhance the application's functionality. In comparison, wxWidgets does not have built-in support for web technologies, so integrating web components requires additional effort and may not be as seamless.

  5. Community support and documentation: NodeGUI has a growing community and active developer support, especially considering its alignment with JavaScript and web technologies. It benefits from a wide range of libraries and resources available in the JavaScript ecosystem. On the other hand, wxWidgets has been around for a longer time and has a well-established community with extensive documentation, examples, and third-party libraries specifically tailored for C++ desktop application development.

  6. Deployment and distribution: NodeGUI simplifies the deployment process by packaging the application into distributable binaries for various platforms using tools like Electron. This makes it easier to distribute the application to end-users. In contrast, wxWidgets requires compilation and linking to create platform-specific executables, which can involve more complex steps and potential compatibility issues across different platforms.

In summary, NodeGUI is a platform-specific JavaScript framework that brings web development technologies to the desktop, offering a declarative approach and integration with existing web components. On the other hand, wxWidgets is a cross-platform C++ library that provides an imperative approach and extensive community support.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

wxWidgets
wxWidgets
NodeGUI
NodeGUI

It is a C++ library that lets developers create applications for Windows, macOS, Linux and other platforms with a single code base. It has popular language bindings for Python, Perl, Ruby and many other languages, and unlike other cross-platform toolkits, it gives applications a truly native look and feel because it uses the platform's native API rather than emulating the GUI. It's also extensive, free, open-source and mature.

It is an open source library for building cross-platform native desktop applications with JavaScript and CSS like styling. It is based on Qt5 and NOT chromium, hence it is memory and cpu efficient.

Support for gesture events (GSoC 2017 project); Getting JavaScript code return value from wxWebView (also GSoC 2017 project); New wxSecretStore class for securely storing user passwords; New, available in parallel with the existing one, CMake build system; Support for context-sensitive translations.
Cross platform;Low CPU and memory footprint;Styling with CSS ;Complete Nodejs api support ;Good Devtools support
Statistics
GitHub Stars
6.9K
GitHub Stars
9.1K
GitHub Forks
1.9K
GitHub Forks
308
Stacks
21
Stacks
15
Followers
75
Followers
109
Votes
19
Votes
6
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 5
    Native looking UI
  • 4
    Learning Curve
  • 3
    Cross platform
  • 2
    Permissive license. Commercial with static linkage.
  • 2
    Open source
Cons
  • 1
    Uses Qt for GUI (wxQt)
Pros
  • 1
    Rich API which binds C++ QT
  • 1
    No webkit thus super resource efficient
  • 1
    It uses Qode which is a fork of Node to be used with QT
  • 1
    Has React & Vue support named (react|vue)-nodegui
  • 1
    Its not hybrid & fully native.
Cons
  • 1
    Doesn't have x86 support
Integrations
Perl
Perl
C++
C++
Windows
Windows
Linux
Linux
Python
Python
macOS
macOS
Ruby
Ruby
Linux
Linux
JavaScript
JavaScript
Node.js
Node.js
TypeScript
TypeScript
Windows
Windows
CSS 3
CSS 3
macOS
macOS
Qt
Qt

What are some alternatives to wxWidgets, NodeGUI?

Electron

Electron

With Electron, creating a desktop application for your company or idea is easy. Initially developed for GitHub's Atom editor, Electron has since been used to create applications by companies like Microsoft, Facebook, Slack, and Docker. The Electron framework lets you write cross-platform desktop applications using JavaScript, HTML and CSS. It is based on io.js and Chromium and is used in the Atom editor.

Sciter

Sciter

It brings a stack of web technologies to desktop UI development. Web designers, and developers, can reuse their experience and expertise in creating modern looking desktop applications.

Qt5

Qt5

It is a full development framework with tools designed to streamline the creation of applications and user interfaces for desktop, embedded, and mobile platforms.

JavaFX

JavaFX

It is a set of graphics and media packages that enables developers to design, create, test, debug, and deploy rich client applications that operate consistently across diverse platforms.

React Native Desktop

React Native Desktop

Build OS X desktop apps using React Native.

JUCE

JUCE

It is a C++ framework for low-latency applications, with cross-platform GUI libraries to get your apps running on Mac OS X, Windows, Linux, iOS and Android.

Proton Native

Proton Native

Create native desktop applications through a React syntax, on all platforms.

pygame

pygame

It is a cross-platform set of Python modules designed for writing video games. It includes computer graphics and sound libraries designed to be used with the Python programming language.

SDL

SDL

It is a cross-platform development library designed to provide low level access to audio, keyboard, mouse, joystick, and graphics hardware via OpenGL and Direct3D.

Element

Element

Element is a Vue 2.0 based component library for developers, designers and product managers, with a set of design resources.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase