StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Frameworks
  5. Node.js vs Photon

Node.js vs Photon

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Node.js
Node.js
Stacks200.4K
Followers164.5K
Votes8.5K
GitHub Stars114.1K
Forks33.7K
Photon
Photon
Stacks32
Followers89
Votes0
GitHub Stars10.1K
Forks573

Node.js vs Photon: What are the differences?

Key Differences between Node.js and Photon

Node.js and Photon are two popular frameworks used for developing web applications. While they share some similarities, they also have distinct features that set them apart.

  1. Execution Environment: Node.js is a runtime environment that allows JavaScript to run on the server-side, providing a non-blocking event-driven architecture. It uses the V8 JavaScript engine and is built on Chrome's JavaScript runtime. On the other hand, Photon is a lightweight, open-source JavaScript framework specifically designed for building scalable and efficient WebSocket applications. It focuses on real-time bidirectional communication between the client and the server, making it ideal for creating chat applications, multiplayer games, and collaborative features.

  2. Concurrency Model: Node.js uses a single-threaded event loop, which means that it can handle multiple concurrent connections efficiently without the need for additional threads. It uses an event-driven non-blocking I/O model to handle requests asynchronously. In contrast, Photon adopts a multi-threaded approach, allowing for better scalability and performance by utilizing multiple cores and threads. This makes it suitable for scenarios that require high concurrency and real-time updates.

  3. Scope of Application: Node.js is a versatile platform that can be used for various types of applications, including web servers, command-line tools, and even IoT devices. It has a vast ecosystem with a wide range of libraries and frameworks available. Photon, on the other hand, is more specialized, focusing primarily on real-time applications that require instant data updates and bidirectional communication. It provides a lightweight and optimized solution for these specific use cases.

  4. Ease of Development: Node.js offers a wide range of modules and resources, making it easy for developers to build and deploy applications. It has a large community and extensive documentation, ensuring that developers can find support and solutions to their problems. Photon, although more specialized, also provides a straightforward and developer-friendly API for creating real-time applications. It offers features like automatic WebSocket handling and room management, simplifying the development process.

  5. Scalability: Node.js is known for its ability to handle thousands of concurrent connections efficiently, making it highly scalable. However, as it runs on a single thread, it may face limitations when it comes to utilizing multiple CPU cores effectively. Photon, on the other hand, has a built-in multi-threading system that allows for better utilization of server resources. This makes it more suitable for applications that require high scalability and real-time data updates.

  6. Community and Support: Node.js has a vast and active community, with a large number of developers contributing to its ecosystem. This ensures that there are numerous resources, libraries, and frameworks available for developers to leverage. While Photon has a smaller community compared to Node.js, it still provides adequate support for developers, with documentation and examples available to help them get started.

In summary, Node.js provides a versatile platform for building various types of applications using JavaScript, with a strong focus on non-blocking I/O and event-driven architecture. Photon, on the other hand, is a specialized framework specifically designed for real-time applications, offering a lightweight, optimized solution for instant data updates and bidirectional communication.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Node.js, Photon

abderrahmane
abderrahmane

Mar 12, 2020

Needs advice

I am a front-end guy and in the last month I've been trynig to be learn backend in python. I think python is a great language to but when i start to learn django I didn't like it because everythong is already done for you, you dont need to do much make it works and I like coding thing that take me time. I've been thinking about switching to another programing language or just learn Node js and stick with it. I need to know if django is that easy.

136k views136k
Comments
Mohammad
Mohammad

Oct 28, 2019

Needs adviceonNode.jsNode.jsLaravelLaravelPHPPHP

I want to create a video sharing service like Youtube, which users can use to upload and watch videos. I prefer to use Vue.js for front-end. What do you suggest for the back-end? @{Node.js}|tool:1011| or @{Laravel}|tool:992| ( @{PHP}|tool:991| ) I need a good performance with high speed, and the most important thing is the ability to handle user's requests if the site's traffic increases. I want to create an algorithm that users who watch others videos earn points (randomly but in clear context) If you have anything else to improve, please let me know. For eg: If you prefer React to Vue.js. Thanks in advance

309k views309k
Comments
Zubair
Zubair

Director at Aafiyah Technologies

Mar 12, 2020

Needs advice

Hi Team

I want your suggestions in order for me to decide which stack is suitable for the below-mentioned requirement.

Currently, I am considering building it in Wordpress (Starting with prebuilt plugins and develop on it)

But I am skeptical, so I am considering Laravel.

And recently I found one very good solution built in Angular, Node and MySQL


Here are the high-level goals I am trying to achieve:

The system has 3 modules

  • Multi-Vendor e-commerce Market Place
  • Peer to peer Selling of used items
  • Listing/ Directory kind of portal for the service industry
290k views290k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Node.js
Node.js
Photon
Photon

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

The fastest way to build beautiful Electron apps using simple HTML and CSS. Underneath it all is Electron. Originally built for GitHub's Atom text editor, Electron is the easiest way to build cross-platform desktop applications.

Statistics
GitHub Stars
114.1K
GitHub Stars
10.1K
GitHub Forks
33.7K
GitHub Forks
573
Stacks
200.4K
Stacks
32
Followers
164.5K
Followers
89
Votes
8.5K
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 1439
    Npm
  • 1279
    Javascript
  • 1129
    Great libraries
  • 1012
    High-performance
  • 805
    Open source
Cons
  • 46
    Bound to a single CPU
  • 45
    New framework every day
  • 40
    Lots of terrible examples on the internet
  • 33
    Asynchronous programming is the worst
  • 24
    Callback
No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available
Electron
Electron

What are some alternatives to Node.js, Photon?

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Android SDK

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Phoenix Framework

Phoenix Framework

Phoenix is a framework for building HTML5 apps, API backends and distributed systems. Written in Elixir, you get beautiful syntax, productive tooling and a fast runtime.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase