StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Languages
  4. Languages
  5. Objective-C vs WebAssembly

Objective-C vs WebAssembly

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Objective-C
Objective-C
Stacks13.3K
Followers6.5K
Votes490
WebAssembly
WebAssembly
Stacks223
Followers218
Votes0
GitHub Stars8.2K
Forks818

Objective-C vs WebAssembly: What are the differences?

<p>Objective-C and WebAssembly are two different technologies used in software development. In this comparison, we will highlight the key differences between Objective-C and WebAssembly.</p>
  1. Language Type: Objective-C is a programming language primarily used for developing iOS and macOS applications, while WebAssembly is a binary instruction format that runs within web browsers and can be used with any language that compiles into it, making it language-agnostic.
  2. Platform Compatibility: Objective-C is mainly used for Apple platforms such as iOS and macOS, limiting its reach, while WebAssembly allows developers to run code on a wide range of platforms, including web browsers, making it more versatile.
  3. Performance: Objective-C tends to have better performance than JavaScript due to its compiled nature, while WebAssembly offers even greater performance improvements over traditional web technologies by running code closer to machine level.
  4. Development Flexibility: Objective-C is tightly integrated with Apple's frameworks and tools, making it ideal for building native iOS and macOS apps, whereas WebAssembly can be used in a variety of applications beyond web development, such as virtual reality, gaming, and server-side processing.
  5. Security: Objective-C may be more prone to security vulnerabilities due to its runtime nature, while WebAssembly runs in a sandboxed environment within the browser, enhancing security by restricting access to sensitive resources.
  6. Ease of Deployment: Deploying Objective-C apps typically requires the App Store or manual installation, whereas WebAssembly apps can be easily distributed via the web, allowing for seamless updates and widespread accessibility.

In Summary, Objective-C is best suited for Apple platform development, while WebAssembly offers platform-independent performance and flexibility for a variety of applications.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Objective-C, WebAssembly

Noel
Noel

Founder, CEO, CTO at NoFilter

Jun 17, 2020

Decided

1 code deploys for both: Android and iOS. There is a huge community behind React Native. And one of the best things is Expo. Expo uses React Native to make everything even more and more simple. Awesome technologies. Some other important thing is that while using React Native, you are reusing all JavaScript knowledge you have in your team. You can move easily a frontend dev to develop mobile applications.

A huge PRO of Expo, is that it includes a full building process. You run 1 line in the terminal, and 10 minutes after you have 2 builds done. Double check EAS Expo.

263k views263k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Objective-C
Objective-C
WebAssembly
WebAssembly

Objective-C is a superset of the C programming language and provides object-oriented capabilities and a dynamic runtime. Objective-C inherits the syntax, primitive types, and flow control statements of C and adds syntax for defining classes and methods. It also adds language-level support for object graph management and object literals while providing dynamic typing and binding, deferring many responsibilities until runtime.

It is an open standard that defines a portable binary code format for executable programs, and a corresponding textual assembly language, as well as interfaces for facilitating interactions between such programs and their host environment.

-
Efficient and fast; Safe; Open and debuggable; Part of the open web platform
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
8.2K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
818
Stacks
13.3K
Stacks
223
Followers
6.5K
Followers
218
Votes
490
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 212
    Ios
  • 115
    Xcode
  • 62
    Backed by apple
  • 47
    Osx
  • 40
    Interface builder
Cons
  • 1
    UNREADABLE
Cons
  • 2
    Security issues
Integrations
No integrations available
Rust
Rust
C++
C++
C lang
C lang

What are some alternatives to Objective-C, WebAssembly?

JavaScript

JavaScript

JavaScript is most known as the scripting language for Web pages, but used in many non-browser environments as well such as node.js or Apache CouchDB. It is a prototype-based, multi-paradigm scripting language that is dynamic,and supports object-oriented, imperative, and functional programming styles.

Python

Python

Python is a general purpose programming language created by Guido Van Rossum. Python is most praised for its elegant syntax and readable code, if you are just beginning your programming career python suits you best.

PHP

PHP

Fast, flexible and pragmatic, PHP powers everything from your blog to the most popular websites in the world.

Ruby

Ruby

Ruby is a language of careful balance. Its creator, Yukihiro “Matz” Matsumoto, blended parts of his favorite languages (Perl, Smalltalk, Eiffel, Ada, and Lisp) to form a new language that balanced functional programming with imperative programming.

Java

Java

Java is a programming language and computing platform first released by Sun Microsystems in 1995. There are lots of applications and websites that will not work unless you have Java installed, and more are created every day. Java is fast, secure, and reliable. From laptops to datacenters, game consoles to scientific supercomputers, cell phones to the Internet, Java is everywhere!

Golang

Golang

Go is expressive, concise, clean, and efficient. Its concurrency mechanisms make it easy to write programs that get the most out of multicore and networked machines, while its novel type system enables flexible and modular program construction. Go compiles quickly to machine code yet has the convenience of garbage collection and the power of run-time reflection. It's a fast, statically typed, compiled language that feels like a dynamically typed, interpreted language.

HTML5

HTML5

HTML5 is a core technology markup language of the Internet used for structuring and presenting content for the World Wide Web. As of October 2014 this is the final and complete fifth revision of the HTML standard of the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C). The previous version, HTML 4, was standardised in 1997.

C#

C#

C# (pronounced "See Sharp") is a simple, modern, object-oriented, and type-safe programming language. C# has its roots in the C family of languages and will be immediately familiar to C, C++, Java, and JavaScript programmers.

Scala

Scala

Scala is an acronym for “Scalable Language”. This means that Scala grows with you. You can play with it by typing one-line expressions and observing the results. But you can also rely on it for large mission critical systems, as many companies, including Twitter, LinkedIn, or Intel do. To some, Scala feels like a scripting language. Its syntax is concise and low ceremony; its types get out of the way because the compiler can infer them.

Elixir

Elixir

Elixir leverages the Erlang VM, known for running low-latency, distributed and fault-tolerant systems, while also being successfully used in web development and the embedded software domain.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase