StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. API Tools
  4. API Tools
  5. OpenAPI Specification vs Soap UI

OpenAPI Specification vs Soap UI

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Soap UI
Soap UI
Stacks241
Followers157
Votes3
OpenAPI Specification
OpenAPI Specification
Stacks267
Followers146
Votes10

OpenAPI Specification vs Soap UI: What are the differences?

Introduction

In the world of web development, there are various tools and specifications that assist in building, testing, and documenting APIs. Two such tools are the OpenAPI Specification (OAS) and SoapUI. While they serve a similar purpose, there are key differences between them that are important to understand. In this Markdown document, we will outline six specific differences between the OpenAPI Specification and SoapUI.

  1. Structure and Format: The OpenAPI Specification (OAS) utilizes a standardized structure and format based on JSON or YAML, making it easy to read and write. On the other hand, SoapUI uses a more flexible and non-standardized format. This difference in structure and format can impact the ease of understanding and working with the specifications.

  2. Focus on REST APIs vs. SOAP APIs: The OpenAPI Specification is primarily designed for documenting and defining RESTful APIs, which are commonly used in modern web development. On the contrary, SoapUI is specifically designed for working with SOAP APIs, an older and less commonly used protocol in comparison to REST. This difference reflects their primary focus and target audience.

  3. Tool Functionality: The OpenAPI Specification primarily provides a standard for documenting and describing APIs, allowing developers to generate interactive documentation, test and validate APIs, and even generate client SDKs. In contrast, SoapUI is an extensive testing tool that not only allows testing and validating SOAP APIs but also offers more advanced features like security testing, mock services, and load testing. This difference showcases the varying functionalities provided by each tool.

  4. Adoption and Community Support: The OpenAPI Specification is widely adopted and supported by a large community, making it easier to find resources, examples, and community-driven tools. On the other hand, SoapUI has a smaller but still active community of users. This difference in community support can affect the availability of resources and the ability to find help or guidance when working with these tools.

  5. Integration with Development Workflow: The OpenAPI Specification is often integrated into modern development workflows, including continuous integration and delivery (CI/CD), Swagger UI, and other third-party tools. SoapUI, on the other hand, is typically used as a standalone tool and may require additional effort to integrate into a modern development workflow. This difference can impact the seamless integration and collaboration with other tools in a development environment.

  6. Learning Curve: Due to its standardized structure and focus on REST APIs, the OpenAPI Specification has a relatively low learning curve. It is beginner-friendly and easier to understand for developers who are familiar with REST API concepts. In contrast, SoapUI may have a steeper learning curve, especially for developers who are new to SOAP APIs or have limited experience with the associated technologies. This difference highlights the learning requirements and familiarity needed for working with these tools.

In summary, the OpenAPI Specification and SoapUI differ in their structure and format, focus on REST versus SOAP APIs, tool functionality, adoption and community support, integration with development workflows, and learning curve. These differences influence the ease of use, target audience, and functionalities provided by each tool.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Soap UI
Soap UI
OpenAPI Specification
OpenAPI Specification

It is an open source functional Testing tool for API Testing. It supports multiple protocols such as SOAP, REST, HTTP, JMS, AMF and JDBC. It supports functional tests, security tests, and virtualization.

It defines a standard, language-agnostic interface to RESTful APIs which allows both humans and computers to discover and understand the capabilities of the service without access to source code, documentation, or through network traffic inspection.

Statistics
Stacks
241
Stacks
267
Followers
157
Followers
146
Votes
3
Votes
10
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 3
    Open source
Pros
  • 5
    API Documentation
  • 5
    API Specification

What are some alternatives to Soap UI, OpenAPI Specification?

Postman

Postman

It is the only complete API development environment, used by nearly five million developers and more than 100,000 companies worldwide.

Paw

Paw

Paw is a full-featured and beautifully designed Mac app that makes interaction with REST services delightful. Either you are an API maker or consumer, Paw helps you build HTTP requests, inspect the server's response and even generate client code.

Karate DSL

Karate DSL

Combines API test-automation, mocks and performance-testing into a single, unified framework. The BDD syntax popularized by Cucumber is language-neutral, and easy for even non-programmers. Besides powerful JSON & XML assertions, you can run tests in parallel for speed - which is critical for HTTP API testing.

Appwrite

Appwrite

Appwrite's open-source platform lets you add Auth, DBs, Functions and Storage to your product and build any application at any scale, own your data, and use your preferred coding languages and tools.

Runscope

Runscope

Keep tabs on all aspects of your API's performance with uptime monitoring, integration testing, logging and real-time monitoring.

Insomnia REST Client

Insomnia REST Client

Insomnia is a powerful REST API Client with cookie management, environment variables, code generation, and authentication for Mac, Window, and Linux.

RAML

RAML

RESTful API Modeling Language (RAML) makes it easy to manage the whole API lifecycle from design to sharing. It's concise - you only write what you need to define - and reusable. It is machine readable API design that is actually human friendly.

Apigee

Apigee

API management, design, analytics, and security are at the heart of modern digital architecture. The Apigee intelligent API platform is a complete solution for moving business to the digital world.

Hoppscotch

Hoppscotch

It is a free, fast and beautiful API request builder. It helps you create requests faster, saving precious time on development

Falcor

Falcor

Falcor lets you represent all your remote data sources as a single domain model via a virtual JSON graph. You code the same way no matter where the data is, whether in memory on the client or over the network on the server.

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope