StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Image Optimization
  4. Image Processing And Management
  5. OpenCV vs Tesseract.js

OpenCV vs Tesseract.js

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

OpenCV
OpenCV
Stacks1.4K
Followers1.1K
Votes102
Tesseract.js
Tesseract.js
Stacks41
Followers105
Votes2
GitHub Stars37.4K
Forks2.3K

OpenCV vs Tesseract.js: What are the differences?

Comparison between OpenCV and Tesseract.js

OpenCV and Tesseract.js are both popular libraries used for image processing tasks, but they differ in several key aspects:

  1. Language: OpenCV is primarily written in the C++ programming language, while Tesseract.js is a JavaScript library, which means it can be used directly in web applications without the need for any server-side processing.

  2. Functionality: OpenCV provides a wide range of functionalities for image processing, computer vision, and machine learning tasks. It includes features such as image filtering, object recognition, and video analysis. On the other hand, Tesseract.js focuses specifically on optical character recognition (OCR), allowing developers to extract text from images.

  3. Performance: Since OpenCV is written in a low-level language like C++, it tends to offer faster performance compared to Tesseract.js. This makes it suitable for real-time applications or scenarios where speed is critical. Tesseract.js, being a JavaScript library, may not perform as efficiently in certain cases, especially for complex image processing tasks.

  4. Dependencies: OpenCV requires installation and setup on the local machine, including the use of native libraries and dependencies. Tesseract.js, on the other hand, can be easily integrated into web applications by simply including the JavaScript library in the code, without the need for any additional installations.

  5. APIs and Documentation: Both OpenCV and Tesseract.js provide extensive APIs and documentation to facilitate usage. However, OpenCV has been around for a longer time and has a larger community, resulting in more comprehensive documentation, tutorials, and examples available for developers.

  6. Flexibility: OpenCV offers more flexibility with its wide range of functionalities, allowing developers to solve a broader range of image processing problems. Tesseract.js, on the other hand, is specifically designed for OCR tasks, making it a more focused and streamlined solution.

In summary, OpenCV and Tesseract.js are both powerful libraries for image processing, but they differ in terms of language, functionality, performance, dependencies, documentation, and flexibility. Choosing the right library depends on the specific requirements and use case of the project.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

OpenCV
OpenCV
Tesseract.js
Tesseract.js

OpenCV was designed for computational efficiency and with a strong focus on real-time applications. Written in optimized C/C++, the library can take advantage of multi-core processing. Enabled with OpenCL, it can take advantage of the hardware acceleration of the underlying heterogeneous compute platform.

This library supports over 60 languages, automatic text orientation and script detection, a simple interface for reading paragraph, word, and character bounding boxes. Tesseract.js can run either in a browser and on a server with NodeJS.

C++, C, Python and Java interfaces and supports Windows, Linux, Mac OS, iOS and Android;More than 47 thousand people of user community and estimated number of downloads exceeding 7 million;Usage ranges from interactive art, to mines inspection, stitching maps on the web or through advanced robotics
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
37.4K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
2.3K
Stacks
1.4K
Stacks
41
Followers
1.1K
Followers
105
Votes
102
Votes
2
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 37
    Computer Vision
  • 18
    Open Source
  • 12
    Imaging
  • 10
    Face Detection
  • 10
    Machine Learning
Pros
  • 2
    Graph Recognization

What are some alternatives to OpenCV, Tesseract.js?

Cloudinary

Cloudinary

Cloudinary is a cloud-based service that streamlines websites and mobile applications' entire image and video management needs - uploads, storage, administration, manipulations, and delivery.

imgix

imgix

imgix is the leading platform for end-to-end visual media processing. With robust APIs, SDKs, and integrations, imgix empowers developers to optimize, transform, manage, and deliver images and videos at scale through simple URL parameters.

ImageKit

ImageKit

ImageKit offers a real-time URL-based API for image & video optimization, streaming, and 50+ transformations to deliver perfect visual experiences on websites and apps. It also comes integrated with a Digital Asset Management solution.

Google Cloud Vision API

Google Cloud Vision API

Google Cloud Vision API enables developers to understand the content of an image by encapsulating powerful machine learning models in an easy to use REST API.

Cloudimage

Cloudimage

Effortless image resizing, optimization and CDN delivery. Make your site fully responsive and really fast.

scikit-image

scikit-image

scikit-image is a collection of algorithms for image processing.

Tesseract OCR

Tesseract OCR

Tesseract was originally developed at Hewlett-Packard Laboratories Bristol and at Hewlett-Packard Co, Greeley Colorado between 1985 and 1994, with some more changes made in 1996 to port to Windows, and some C++izing in 1998. In 2005 Tesseract was open sourced by HP. Since 2006 it is developed by Google.

Kraken.io

Kraken.io

It supports JPEG, PNG and GIF files. You can optimize your images in two ways - by providing an URL of the image you want to optimize or by uploading an image file directly to its API.

ImageEngine

ImageEngine

ImageEngine is an intelligent Image CDN that dynamically optimizes image content tailored to the end users device. Using device intelligence at the CDN edge, developers can greatly simplify their image management process while accelerating their site.

FFMPEG

FFMPEG

The universal multimedia toolkit.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase