StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Build Automation
  4. Infrastructure Build Tools
  5. Packer vs Vim-Plug

Packer vs Vim-Plug

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Packer
Packer
Stacks575
Followers566
Votes41
Vim-Plug
Vim-Plug
Stacks71
Followers100
Votes17
GitHub Stars35.4K
Forks2.0K

Packer vs Vim-Plug: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this comparison, we will highlight the key differences between Packer and Vim-Plug.

  1. Plugin Management: Packer is a tool used for creating identical machine images for multiple platforms, whereas Vim-Plug is specifically designed for managing plugins within the Vim text editor, enabling easy installation and updating.

  2. Functionality Scope: Packer focuses on creating machine images, providing a platform-agnostic approach to automate the process, while Vim-Plug is tailored exclusively for managing Vim plugins, enhancing the functionality and features of the Vim editor.

  3. Installation Process: Packer requires the setup and configuration of templates to create machine images, involving a more complex installation process, while Vim-Plug can be easily installed within Vim by adding a few lines to the Vim configuration file, simplifying the setup.

  4. User Base: Packer is commonly used by DevOps professionals and system administrators for infrastructure automation, whereas Vim-Plug caters specifically to developers and Vim users looking to enhance their text editing experience with plugins and extensions.

  5. Version Control: Packer provides detailed version control and rollback capabilities for machine image creation, enabling users to track changes and revert to previous versions if needed, whereas Vim-Plug focuses more on managing plugin versions within Vim, ensuring compatibility and stability.

  6. Customization Level: Packer offers extensive customization options for creating machine images tailored to specific requirements, allowing users to fine-tune the configurations, while Vim-Plug is more standardized in terms of plugin management within Vim, offering limited customization options.

In Summary, Packer and Vim-Plug serve different purposes, with Packer focusing on automated image creation for multiple platforms, while Vim-Plug is dedicated to managing plugins within the Vim text editor.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Packer
Packer
Vim-Plug
Vim-Plug

Packer automates the creation of any type of machine image. It embraces modern configuration management by encouraging you to use automated scripts to install and configure the software within your Packer-made images.

A minimalist Vim plugin manager.

Super fast infrastructure deployment. Packer images allow you to launch completely provisioned and configured machines in seconds, rather than several minutes or hours.;Multi-provider portability. Because Packer creates identical images for multiple platforms, you can run production in AWS, staging/QA in a private cloud like OpenStack, and development in desktop virtualization solutions such as VMware or VirtualBox.;Improved stability. Packer installs and configures all the software for a machine at the time the image is built. If there are bugs in these scripts, they'll be caught early, rather than several minutes after a machine is launched.;Greater testability. After a machine image is built, that machine image can be quickly launched and smoke tested to verify that things appear to be working. If they are, you can be confident that any other machines launched from that image will function properly.
Easier to setup: Single file. No boilerplate code required.;Easier to use: Concise, intuitive syntax;Super-fast parallel installation/update (requires +ruby);On-demand loading to achieve fast startup time;Post-update hooks;Can choose a specific branch or tag for each plugin;Support for externally managed plugins
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
35.4K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
2.0K
Stacks
575
Stacks
71
Followers
566
Followers
100
Votes
41
Votes
17
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 27
    Cross platform builds
  • 8
    Vm creation automation
  • 4
    Bake in security
  • 1
    Easy to use
  • 1
    Good documentation
Pros
  • 5
    Simple
  • 5
    Parallel plugins downloading
  • 4
    Fast
  • 3
    Intuitive
Integrations
Amazon EC2
Amazon EC2
DigitalOcean
DigitalOcean
Docker
Docker
Google Compute Engine
Google Compute Engine
OpenStack
OpenStack
VirtualBox
VirtualBox
Vim
Vim

What are some alternatives to Packer, Vim-Plug?

AWS CloudFormation

AWS CloudFormation

You can use AWS CloudFormation’s sample templates or create your own templates to describe the AWS resources, and any associated dependencies or runtime parameters, required to run your application. You don’t need to figure out the order in which AWS services need to be provisioned or the subtleties of how to make those dependencies work.

Spacemacs

Spacemacs

Since version 0.101.0 and later Spacemacs totally abolishes the frontiers between Vim and Emacs. The user can now choose his/her preferred editing style and enjoy all the Spacemacs features. Even better, it is possible to dynamically switch between the two styles seamlessly which makes it possible for programmers with different styles to do seat pair programming using the same editor.

Scalr

Scalr

Scalr is a remote state & operations backend for Terraform with access controls, policy as code, and many quality of life features.

Pulumi

Pulumi

Pulumi is a cloud development platform that makes creating cloud programs easy and productive. Skip the YAML and just write code. Pulumi is multi-language, multi-cloud and fully extensible in both its engine and ecosystem of packages.

ReSharper

ReSharper

It is a popular developer productivity extension for Microsoft Visual Studio. It automates most of what can be automated in your coding routines. It finds compiler errors, runtime errors, redundancies, and code smells right as you type, suggesting intelligent corrections for them.

SpaceVim

SpaceVim

SpaceVim is a Modular configuration, a bundle of custom settings and plugins, for Vim. It got inspired by spacemacs.

Kite

Kite

Your editor and web browser don't know anything about each other, which is why you end up continuously switching between them. Kite bridges that gap, bringing an internet-connected programming experience right alongside your editor.

Azure Resource Manager

Azure Resource Manager

It is the deployment and management service for Azure. It provides a management layer that enables you to create, update, and delete resources in your Azure subscription. You use management features, like access control, locks, and tags, to secure and organize your resources after deployment.

Habitat

Habitat

Habitat is a new approach to automation that focuses on the application instead of the infrastructure it runs on. With Habitat, the apps you build, deploy, and manage behave consistently in any runtime — metal, VMs, containers, and PaaS. You'll spend less time on the environment and more time building features.

Google Cloud Deployment Manager

Google Cloud Deployment Manager

Google Cloud Deployment Manager allows you to specify all the resources needed for your application in a declarative format using yaml.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana