Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Phoenix Framework vs Play: What are the differences?
Language Support: Phoenix Framework is built using Elixir, a functional programming language that runs on the Erlang VM, while Play Framework is based on Java and Scala. This difference in language support influences the way developers write code, handle concurrency, and manage scalability in their applications.
Concurrency Model: Phoenix Framework leverages the Erlang/OTP model that provides lightweight processes and actor-based concurrency, enabling efficient handling of concurrent requests. In contrast, Play Framework relies on the Akka toolkit for implementing a similar actor-based model, but developers need to write additional code for handling concurrency compared to Phoenix.
Database Integration: Phoenix Framework uses Ecto as its default database library, which offers a powerful query interface and seamless integration with various databases. On the other hand, Play Framework provides support for multiple databases through its built-in Slick library, allowing developers to work with relational databases more conveniently.
Routing System: Phoenix Framework follows a RESTful routing approach, making it easy to define routes and actions for different HTTP methods. In contrast, Play Framework uses a more traditional HTTP routing system that requires defining routes explicitly, sometimes making it more verbose than the Phoenix approach.
Template Engine: Phoenix Framework utilizes the EEx templating engine for generating dynamic HTML content, offering a familiar experience for developers coming from Ruby on Rails. Play Framework, on the other hand, uses Twirl as its default template engine, which is more type-safe and integrates well with Scala's static typing system.
Community and Ecosystem: Phoenix Framework has a smaller but growing community compared to Play Framework, which has a larger user base and extensive ecosystem with various plugins, libraries, and tools. The choice between these frameworks may also depend on the availability of resources and community support for developers.
In Summary, the Phoenix Framework and Play differ in language support, concurrency model, database integration, routing system, template engine, and community size, all influencing the development experience and scalability of web applications using these frameworks.
In the past few months, a project we're working on grew up quite fast. Since we're adding more and more features, I'm considering migrating my Express/TS REST API towards a more solid and more "enterprise-like" framework. Since I am experienced with TypeScript but not so much with Rails nor Play (Scala), I'd like to have some advice on which one could provide the best development experience, and most importantly, the smoothest paradigm transition from the JS/TS world. I've worked on some personal project with Rails, but I've found the Ruby language really distant from what the TypeScript ecosystem and syntax are, whereas on the opposite - during the brief tours I've taken in the past weeks - it's been a pleasure coding in Scala. Obviously, there are some key differences between the two languages - and the two frameworks consequently - but despite all the ROR automation and ease of use I don't despise at all Scala's pragmatic and great features such as static typing, pattern matching, and type inference. So... Please help me out with the choice! Regards
I don't have the Scala experience to compare the two, but I can say that Ruby is a wonderful language. For procedural programming where you don't need a lot of concurrent execution threads, it's superior to Node.JS in my opinion. All of the concepts from Typescript have equivalent syntax in Ruby, but there are fewer symbols (e.g. () => { ... }); ) and more keywords (eg 'do ... end'). It's a very flexible language and allows for a lot of different approaches to how it's written, so coding standards and careful organization is important. In the long run, however, you'll find it quicker to debug than Node.JS and just as powerful.
If you are comfortable with TypeScript, why not evolve to a C# ecosystem? Asp.Net Core + Entity Framework is a mature and well supported technology. As far as I can see in the enterprise market, the most adopted choice is still Java. So, maybe you may have a look to SpringBoot - and ultimately Quarkus.
This is advice regardless of your background and requirements. The Play framework has a terrible and complicated design, don't risk it. I even suggest Spring and Kotlin over it! You can use Scala for small services and Data Engineering stuff and benefit optimizations and threading of JVM. RoR, on the other hand, has a huge development speed, which I believe is a big advantage cause you can handle performance bottlenecks later. Also, Scala has another downside, which is featureful in terms of OO and FP paradigms, which makes anyone write code freely with any personal style and makes it a problem in a team, Hence a coding style has to be defined if there would be Scala development team.
If software performance is your top priority, then Scala/Play is probably best. If developer productivity is your top priority, then Ruby on Rails is the best choice in my opinion.
The Rails framework is batteries-included. The framework takes care of many things by default so that you don't have to. Logging, security, etc. It's also well-integrated; for example, controllers understand models out of the box. I had a better experience with RoR than with Play.
On the other hand, Scala and the JVM are more performant in general, so they can scale to serve more requests per second on the same hardware.
If you're considering serverless functions, then Scala is probably a better choice because it would be faster to load, giving you better economics.
#rust #elixir So am creating a messenger with voice call capabilities app which the user signs up using phone number and so at first i wanted to use Actix so i learned Rust so i thought to myself because well its first i felt its a bit immature to use actix web even though some companies are using Rust but we cant really say the full potential of Rust in a full scale app for example in Discord both Elixir and Rust are used meaning there is equal need for them but for Elixir so many companies use it from Whatsapp, Wechat, etc and this means something for Rust is not ready to go full scale we cant assume all this possibilities when it come Rust. So i decided to go the Erlang way after alot of Thinking so Do you think i made the right decision?Am 19 year programmer so i assume am not experienced as you so your answer or comment would really valuable to me
Pros of Phoenix Framework
- High performance120
- Super fast76
- Rapid development70
- Open source62
- Erlang VM60
- Well designed46
- Channels45
- Easily Scalable39
- Very extensible35
- Restful35
- Functional Programming11
- Inspired by Rails10
- Great community10
- Beautiful code8
- Ecto8
- Scalable6
- Fault tolerant6
- LiveView feature5
- Elegant4
- Insanely fast and easy4
- Feels like working with rails framework with more power4
- Built-in websocket support3
- Benevolent dictator that decides project course3
- Great integration with GraphQL3
- 2
- Front-End Agnostic2
- Functional approach1
Pros of Play
- Scala81
- Web-friendly architecture55
- Built on akka55
- Stateless50
- High-scalable47
- Fast46
- Open source40
- Java34
- High velocity27
- Fun24
- Lightweight9
- Non-blocking io8
- Developer friendly6
- Simple template engine5
- Scalability4
- Pure love3
- Resource efficient2
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Phoenix Framework
- No jobs6
- Very difficult5
Cons of Play
- Evolves fast, keep up with releases3
- Unnecessarily complicated1
