Photon vs Semantic UI

Overview

Semantic UI

Stacks992

Followers1.5K

Votes673

GitHub Stars51.2K

Forks4.9K

Photon

Stacks32

Followers89

Votes0

GitHub Stars10.1K

Forks573

Photon vs Semantic UI: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this markdown, we will compare the key differences between Photon and Semantic UI.

Layout System: Photon provides a fluid and responsive grid system that allows for easy organization and alignment of content on a webpage. On the other hand, Semantic UI offers a more comprehensive grid system with options for responsive design, pushing, pulling, and stacking elements without the need for media queries.
Component Availability: Photon offers a limited set of components focusing mainly on basic UI elements such as buttons, forms, and tables. In contrast, Semantic UI provides a vast library of components including accordions, dropdowns, menus, and modals, making it more suitable for complex and feature-rich web applications.
Design Customization: Photon offers minimal design customization options, mainly sticking to a simple and clean default design. Semantic UI, on the other hand, provides extensive theming capabilities through variables and theming tools, allowing developers to easily customize the look and feel of components to match their brand or design requirements.
Documentation and Support: Photon lacks comprehensive documentation and community support compared to Semantic UI, which has extensive documentation, examples, and a large active community. This makes it easier for developers to get help, find resources, and troubleshoot issues while using Semantic UI in their projects.
JavaScript Integration: Photon has limited JavaScript functionality and relies more on CSS for interactivity. Semantic UI, on the other hand, includes built-in JavaScript components such as modals, dropdowns, and transitions, making it easier to add interactive elements to a website without writing custom scripts.
Accessibility Features: Semantic UI places a strong emphasis on accessibility, offering features such as keyboard navigation, ARIA attributes, and focus management out of the box. Photon, while not lacking in accessibility features, may require more manual effort to ensure compliance with web accessibility standards.

In Summary, when comparing Photon and Semantic UI, the key differences lie in their layout system, component availability, design customization, documentation and support, JavaScript integration, and accessibility features.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Semantic UI	Photon
Semantic empowers designers and developers by creating a shared vocabulary for UI.	The fastest way to build beautiful Electron apps using simple HTML and CSS. Underneath it all is Electron. Originally built for GitHub's Atom text editor, Electron is the easiest way to build cross-platform desktop applications.
Build Responsive Layouts Easier;Self Explanatory;Tag ambivalent;Powerful tools for expressing groups and collections;Portable and self-contained	-
Statistics
GitHub Stars 51.2K	GitHub Stars 10.1K
GitHub Forks 4.9K	GitHub Forks 573
Stacks 992	Stacks 32
Followers 1.5K	Followers 89
Votes 673	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 157 Easy to use and looks elegant 92 Variety of components 64 Themes 61 Has out-of-the-box widgets i would actually use 57 Semantic, duh Cons 5 Outdated build tool (gulp 3)) 3 Poor accessibility support 3 HTML is not semantic (see list component) 2 Javascript is tied to jquery	No community feedback yet
Integrations
AngularJS React Ember.js Meteor	Electron

What are some alternatives to Semantic UI, Photon?

Bootstrap

Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.

Foundation

Foundation is the most advanced responsive front-end framework in the world. You can quickly prototype and build sites or apps that work on any kind of device with Foundation, which includes layout constructs (like a fully responsive grid), elements and best practices.

Materialize

A CSS Framework based on material design.

Material Design for Angular

Material Design is a specification for a unified system of visual, motion, and interaction design that adapts across different devices. Our goal is to deliver a lean, lightweight set of AngularJS-native UI elements that implement the material design system for use in Angular SPAs.

Material-UI

Material UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design.

Blazor

Blazor is a .NET web framework that runs in any browser. You author Blazor apps using C#/Razor and HTML.

Quasar Framework

Build responsive Single Page Apps, SSR Apps, PWAs, Hybrid Mobile Apps and Electron Apps, all using the same codebase!, powered with Vue.

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js presets all the configuration needed to make your development of a Vue.js application enjoyable. You can use Nuxt.js for SSR, SPA, Static Generated, PWA and more.

UIkIt

UIkit gives you a comprehensive collection of HTML, CSS, and JS components which is simple to use, easy to customize and extendable.

Tailwind CSS

Tailwind is different from frameworks like Bootstrap, Foundation, or Bulma in that it's not a UI kit. It doesn't have a default theme, and there are no build-in UI components. It comes with a menu of predesigned widgets to build your site with, but doesn't impose design decisions that are difficult to undo.

Related Comparisons

Photon vs Semantic UI: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this markdown, we will compare the key differences between Photon and Semantic UI.

Layout System: Photon provides a fluid and responsive grid system that allows for easy organization and alignment of content on a webpage. On the other hand, Semantic UI offers a more comprehensive grid system with options for responsive design, pushing, pulling, and stacking elements without the need for media queries.
Component Availability: Photon offers a limited set of components focusing mainly on basic UI elements such as buttons, forms, and tables. In contrast, Semantic UI provides a vast library of components including accordions, dropdowns, menus, and modals, making it more suitable for complex and feature-rich web applications.
Design Customization: Photon offers minimal design customization options, mainly sticking to a simple and clean default design. Semantic UI, on the other hand, provides extensive theming capabilities through variables and theming tools, allowing developers to easily customize the look and feel of components to match their brand or design requirements.
Documentation and Support: Photon lacks comprehensive documentation and community support compared to Semantic UI, which has extensive documentation, examples, and a large active community. This makes it easier for developers to get help, find resources, and troubleshoot issues while using Semantic UI in their projects.
JavaScript Integration: Photon has limited JavaScript functionality and relies more on CSS for interactivity. Semantic UI, on the other hand, includes built-in JavaScript components such as modals, dropdowns, and transitions, making it easier to add interactive elements to a website without writing custom scripts.
Accessibility Features: Semantic UI places a strong emphasis on accessibility, offering features such as keyboard navigation, ARIA attributes, and focus management out of the box. Photon, while not lacking in accessibility features, may require more manual effort to ensure compliance with web accessibility standards.

Photon vs Semantic UI

Overview

Photon vs Semantic UI: What are the differences?