Photon vs Spring-Boot

Overview

Spring Boot

Stacks26.7K

Followers24.3K

Votes1.0K

GitHub Stars78.9K

Forks41.6K

Photon

Stacks32

Followers89

Votes0

GitHub Stars10.1K

Forks573

Photon vs Spring-Boot: What are the differences?

Photon and Spring Boot are two popular frameworks used in developing web applications. Let's explore the key differences between them:

Deployment Model: Photon is designed for building serverless functions and applications that are highly scalable and event-driven. It is primarily focused on executing small, self-contained pieces of code in response to events. On the other hand, Spring Boot is a framework that simplifies the development of Java applications, including web applications. It follows a traditional deployment model where the application is deployed on a server and serves HTTP requests.
Programming Language Support: Photon supports multiple programming languages, including JavaScript, TypeScript, and Python, allowing developers to choose the language they are most comfortable with. Spring Boot, on the other hand, is built on top of Java, making it specifically suited for Java developers.
Integration with other AWS Services: Photon is tightly integrated with various AWS services, including event sources like AWS Lambda, Amazon API Gateway, Amazon DynamoDB, and more. This makes it easy to build applications that leverage these services. Spring Boot provides integration with various libraries and frameworks, but it may require additional configuration and coding to integrate with AWS services.
Development Approach: Photon follows a serverless architecture, which means that developers can focus solely on writing the business logic without concerning themselves with the underlying infrastructure. It abstracts away the infrastructure management and scaling aspects. In contrast, Spring Boot follows a more traditional approach where developers have the flexibility to choose the deployment environment and manage the infrastructure as per their requirements.
Community and Ecosystem: Spring Boot has a large and vibrant community with extensive documentation, tutorials, and support available. It has been around for a longer time and has a mature ecosystem with numerous third-party libraries and frameworks that can be easily integrated. Photon, being a newer entrant, may not have an extensive ecosystem or as much community support as Spring Boot.
Learning Curve: Spring Boot may have a steeper learning curve, especially for developers who are new to Java or the Spring framework. It requires a good understanding of Java and the Spring ecosystem. Photon, on the other hand, provides a simpler and more focused programming model, which may be easier to grasp for developers with basic knowledge of the supported languages.

In summary, Photon is a lightweight framework for building Java-based microservices with a focus on simplicity and speed. Spring Boot, on the other hand, is a comprehensive and widely adopted framework that simplifies the development of Java applications, providing a robust and opinionated structure.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Spring Boot, Photon

Eva

Fullstack developer

Jul 28, 2020

Needs adviceon

Java

Spring Boot

JavaScript

Hello, I am a fullstack web developer. I have been working for a company with Java/ Spring Boot and client-side JavaScript(mainly jQuery, some AngularJS) for the past 4 years. As I wish to now work as a freelancer, I am faced with a dilemma: which stack to choose given my current knowledge and the state of the market?

I've heard PHP is very popular in the freelance world. I don't know PHP. However, I'm sure it wouldn't be difficult to learn since it has many similarities with Java (OOP). It seems to me that Laravel has similarities with Spring Boot (it's MVC and OOP). Also, people say Laravel works well with Vue.js, which is my favorite JS framework.

On the other hand, I already know the Javascript language, and I like Vue.js, so I figure I could go the fullstack Javascript route with ExpressJS. However, I am not sure if these techs are ripe for freelancing (with regards to RAD, stability, reliability, security, costs, etc.) Is it true that Express is almost always used with MongoDB? Because my experience is mostly with SQL databases.

The projects I would like to work on are custom web applications/websites for small businesses. I have developed custom ERPs before and found that Java was a good fit, except for it taking a long time to develop. I cannot make a choice, and I am constantly switching between trying PHP and Node.js/Express. Any real-world advice would be welcome! I would love to find a stack that I enjoy while doing meaningful freelance coding.

826k views826k

Comments

Slimane

Jul 9, 2020

Needs adviceon

Spring Boot

NestJS

Node.js

I am currently planning to build a project from scratch. I will be using Angular as front-end framework, but for the back-end I am not sure which framework to use between Spring Boot and NestJS. I have worked with Spring Boot before, but my new project contains a lot of I/O operations, in fact it will show a daily report. I thought about the new Spring Web Reactive Framework but given the idea that Node.js is the most popular on handling non blocking I/O I am planning to start learning NestJS since it is based on Angular philosophy and TypeScript which I am familiar with. Looking forward to hear from you dear Community.

917k views917k

Comments

Anonymous

Sep 15, 2020

Needs adviceon

Kotlin

Django

I’ve been using Django for the last year on and off to do my backend API. I’m getting a bit frustrated with the Django REST framework with the setup of the serializers and Django for the lack of web sockets. I’m considering either Spring or .NET Core. I’m familiar with Kotlin and C# but I’ve not built any substantial projects with them. I like OOP, building a desktop app, web API, and also the potential to get a job in the future or building a tool at work to manage my documents, dashboard and processes point cloud data.

I’m familiar with c/cpp, TypeScript.

I would love your insights on where I should go.

617k views617k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Spring Boot	Photon
Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.	The fastest way to build beautiful Electron apps using simple HTML and CSS. Underneath it all is Electron. Originally built for GitHub's Atom text editor, Electron is the easiest way to build cross-platform desktop applications.
Statistics
GitHub Stars 78.9K	GitHub Stars 10.1K
GitHub Forks 41.6K	GitHub Forks 573
Stacks 26.7K	Stacks 32
Followers 24.3K	Followers 89
Votes 1.0K	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 149 Powerful and handy 134 Easy setup 128 Java 90 Spring 85 Fast Cons 23 Heavy weight 18 Annotation ceremony 13 Java 11 Many config files needed 5 Reactive	No community feedback yet
Integrations
Spring Java	Electron

What are some alternatives to Spring Boot, Photon?

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Phoenix Framework

Phoenix is a framework for building HTML5 apps, API backends and distributed systems. Written in Elixir, you get beautiful syntax, productive tooling and a fast runtime.

Related Comparisons

Photon vs Spring-Boot: What are the differences?

Photon and Spring Boot are two popular frameworks used in developing web applications. Let's explore the key differences between them:

Deployment Model: Photon is designed for building serverless functions and applications that are highly scalable and event-driven. It is primarily focused on executing small, self-contained pieces of code in response to events. On the other hand, Spring Boot is a framework that simplifies the development of Java applications, including web applications. It follows a traditional deployment model where the application is deployed on a server and serves HTTP requests.
Programming Language Support: Photon supports multiple programming languages, including JavaScript, TypeScript, and Python, allowing developers to choose the language they are most comfortable with. Spring Boot, on the other hand, is built on top of Java, making it specifically suited for Java developers.
Integration with other AWS Services: Photon is tightly integrated with various AWS services, including event sources like AWS Lambda, Amazon API Gateway, Amazon DynamoDB, and more. This makes it easy to build applications that leverage these services. Spring Boot provides integration with various libraries and frameworks, but it may require additional configuration and coding to integrate with AWS services.
Development Approach: Photon follows a serverless architecture, which means that developers can focus solely on writing the business logic without concerning themselves with the underlying infrastructure. It abstracts away the infrastructure management and scaling aspects. In contrast, Spring Boot follows a more traditional approach where developers have the flexibility to choose the deployment environment and manage the infrastructure as per their requirements.
Community and Ecosystem: Spring Boot has a large and vibrant community with extensive documentation, tutorials, and support available. It has been around for a longer time and has a mature ecosystem with numerous third-party libraries and frameworks that can be easily integrated. Photon, being a newer entrant, may not have an extensive ecosystem or as much community support as Spring Boot.
Learning Curve: Spring Boot may have a steeper learning curve, especially for developers who are new to Java or the Spring framework. It requires a good understanding of Java and the Spring ecosystem. Photon, on the other hand, provides a simpler and more focused programming model, which may be easier to grasp for developers with basic knowledge of the supported languages.

Photon vs Spring-Boot

Overview