StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Infrastructure as a Service
  4. Operating Systems
  5. Photon vs Ubuntu

Photon vs Ubuntu

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Ubuntu
Ubuntu
Stacks80.4K
Followers59.1K
Votes468
Photon
Photon
Stacks32
Followers89
Votes0
GitHub Stars10.1K
Forks573

Photon vs Ubuntu: What are the differences?

PhotonKit is a front-end framework for building user interfaces, while Ubuntu is a widely used operating system. Here are the key differences between PhotonKit and Ubuntu:

  1. Primary Purpose and Use: PhotonKit is a front-end framework designed for building user interfaces with a focus on simplicity and consistency. It provides UI components and styles that developers can use to create visually appealing and responsive web interfaces. On the other hand, Ubuntu is a versatile operating system that serves a wide range of computing needs, including desktop computing, servers, and cloud deployments.

  2. Scope and Target Audience: PhotonKit is targeted at web developers and designers who want to streamline the process of creating consistent and visually pleasing user interfaces. It offers pre-designed components and styles that can be easily integrated into web projects. Ubuntu, on the other hand, caters to a broader audience, including individual users, enterprises, and developers, offering a complete operating system with various features and tools.

  3. Functionality: PhotonKit primarily provides UI components, styles, and guidelines to enhance the visual design of web applications. It doesn't encompass the full range of features and functionalities of an operating system. Ubuntu offers a complete software ecosystem, including an operating system kernel, package management, system tools, and a graphical user interface.

  4. Integration: PhotonKit is integrated into web development projects by including its components and styles in the codebase, enhancing the user interface of the application. Ubuntu, on the other hand, requires installation on hardware or virtual machines and serves as a complete computing environment with its own user interface and software applications.

  5. Use Case: PhotonKit is used when developers want to create consistent and visually appealing user interfaces for web applications. It simplifies the UI design process by providing ready-made components. Ubuntu is employed for various purposes, such as personal computing, web hosting, server deployments, and cloud instances, making it a versatile solution for different computing scenarios.

  6. Development vs. Computing Environment: PhotonKit is centered around front-end development, helping developers create better user interfaces for web applications. Ubuntu is a full-fledged operating system that provides a platform for various computing tasks, from software development to running servers and hosting websites.

In summary, PhotonKit is a front-end framework for enhancing user interfaces, while Ubuntu is a versatile operating system that caters to a wide range of computing needs.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Ubuntu, Photon

Michaël
Michaël

Fullstack Dev at Synovo Group

Nov 18, 2020

Decided

Ubuntu always let people do what they want to do, it pushes its users to know what they are doing, what they want and helps them learn what they ignore.

Ubuntu is simple, works out-of-the-box after installation and has a incredibly huge community behind.

Ubuntu is lightweight and open, in the way, that the user has access to free AND efficient applications (most of the time, without ads) and, even if learning its folder structure is challenging, once done, you are really able to call yourself "someone who knows what is in your computer".

Windows, in comparison, is heavy, tends to make decision for you and always enable tracking application by default. grr

It has a simple user interface, of course, but on the stability point of view, it is hard to compete with something simpler (even with less features).

Personal preference : I prefer something simple that works 99% of the time, than a full-featured auto-magical system that works 50% of the time (and ask if the good version of the driver is really installed...)

46.7k views46.7k
Comments
Jerome/Zen
Jerome/Zen

Software Engineer

Aug 2, 2020

Decided

Global familiarity, free, widely used, and as a debian distro feels more comfortable when rapidly switching between local macOS and remote command lines.

CentOS does boast quite a few security/stability improvements, however as a RHEL-based distro, differs quite significantly in the command line and suffers from slightly less frequent package updates. (Could be a good or bad thing depending on your use-case and if it is public facing)

271k views271k
Comments
Simon
Simon

Developer Advocate at k6 / Load Impact

Mar 7, 2020

Decided

At the moment of the decision, my desktop was the primary place I did work. Due to this, I can't have it blow up on me while I work. While Arch is interesting and powerful, Ubuntu offers (at least for me) a lot more stability and lets me focus on other things than maintaining my own OS installation.

299k views299k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Ubuntu
Ubuntu
Photon
Photon

Ubuntu is an ancient African word meaning ‘humanity to others’. It also means ‘I am what I am because of who we all are’. The Ubuntu operating system brings the spirit of Ubuntu to the world of computers.

The fastest way to build beautiful Electron apps using simple HTML and CSS. Underneath it all is Electron. Originally built for GitHub's Atom text editor, Electron is the easiest way to build cross-platform desktop applications.

Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
10.1K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
573
Stacks
80.4K
Stacks
32
Followers
59.1K
Followers
89
Votes
468
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 230
    Free to use
  • 96
    Easy setup for testing discord bot
  • 57
    Gateway Linux Distro
  • 54
    Simple interface
  • 9
    Don't need driver installation in most cases
Cons
  • 5
    Demanding system requirements
  • 4
    Adds overhead and unnecessary complexity over Debian
  • 2
    Snapd installed by default
  • 1
    Systemd
No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available
Electron
Electron

What are some alternatives to Ubuntu, Photon?

Debian

Debian

Debian systems currently use the Linux kernel or the FreeBSD kernel. Linux is a piece of software started by Linus Torvalds and supported by thousands of programmers worldwide. FreeBSD is an operating system including a kernel and other software.

Electron

Electron

With Electron, creating a desktop application for your company or idea is easy. Initially developed for GitHub's Atom editor, Electron has since been used to create applications by companies like Microsoft, Facebook, Slack, and Docker. The Electron framework lets you write cross-platform desktop applications using JavaScript, HTML and CSS. It is based on io.js and Chromium and is used in the Atom editor.

Arch Linux

Arch Linux

A lightweight and flexible Linux distribution that tries to Keep It Simple.

Fedora

Fedora

Fedora is a Linux-based operating system that provides users with access to the latest free and open source software, in a stable, secure and easy to manage form. Fedora is the largest of many free software creations of the Fedora Project. Because of its predominance, the word "Fedora" is often used interchangeably to mean both the Fedora Project and the Fedora operating system.

Linux Mint

Linux Mint

The purpose of Linux Mint is to produce a modern, elegant and comfortable operating system which is both powerful and easy to use.

CentOS

CentOS

The CentOS Project is a community-driven free software effort focused on delivering a robust open source ecosystem. For users, we offer a consistent manageable platform that suits a wide variety of deployments. For open source communities, we offer a solid, predictable base to build upon, along with extensive resources to build, test, release, and maintain their code.

Linux

Linux

A clone of the operating system Unix, written from scratch by Linus Torvalds with assistance from a loosely-knit team of hackers across the Net. It aims towards POSIX and Single UNIX Specification compliance.

CoreOS

CoreOS

It is designed for security, consistency, and reliability. Instead of installing packages via yum or apt, it uses Linux containers to manage your services at a higher level of abstraction. A single service's code and all dependencies are packaged within a container that can be run on one or many machines.

Gentoo Linux

Gentoo Linux

It is a free operating system based on either Linux or FreeBSD that can be automatically optimized and customized for just about any application or need.

Alpine Linux

Alpine Linux

Alpine Linux is a security-oriented, lightweight Linux distribution based on musl libc and busybox.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase