PHP CodeSniffer vs SonarLint

Overview

SonarLint

Stacks175

Followers352

Votes16

PHP CodeSniffer

Stacks43

Followers43

Votes0

GitHub Stars10.8K

Forks1.5K

PHP CodeSniffer vs SonarLint: What are the differences?

Introduction:

In this article, we will discuss the key differences between PHP CodeSniffer and SonarLint. Both PHP CodeSniffer and SonarLint are popular tools used by developers for static code analysis. While they serve a similar purpose, there are some notable differences between them.

Integration with IDEs and Build Tools: PHP CodeSniffer can be easily integrated into various IDEs like Visual Studio Code, PhpStorm, and more. It can also be integrated into build tools like Apache Ant, Apache Maven, and Phing. On the other hand, SonarLint provides plugins for widely used IDEs like IntelliJ IDEA, Eclipse, and Visual Studio, allowing developers to analyze code directly within the IDE.
Rules and Customizability: PHP CodeSniffer comes with a set of predefined rules that can be used out of the box. It allows developers to create custom rules tailored to their specific needs. SonarLint, on the other hand, provides a predefined set of rules but also offers a wider range of rules that can be accessed through SonarQube or SonarCloud for more comprehensive analysis. SonarLint allows some customization of rules but not to the extent of PHP CodeSniffer.
Integration with CI/CD Pipelines: PHP CodeSniffer can be easily integrated into continuous integration and delivery (CI/CD) pipelines, allowing code analysis to be performed automatically during the build process. It can generate customized reports in various formats like XML, JSON, and CheckStyle. SonarLint, on the other hand, is mainly designed to be used within the IDE and does not provide direct integration with CI/CD pipelines. However, the results from SonarLint analysis can be synchronized with SonarQube, which supports CI/CD integration.
Language and Framework Support: PHP CodeSniffer is primarily focused on analyzing PHP code and provides specific rules and guidelines for PHP coding standards like PSR-2. It also supports analyzing JavaScript and CSS files. On the other hand, SonarLint supports a wider range of programming languages including but not limited to Java, C#, C/C++, JavaScript, TypeScript, and Python. It also provides specific rules for popular frameworks like Spring, Hibernate, and Angular.
Real-Time Analysis and Feedback: SonarLint provides real-time analysis and feedback while developers are writing code in the IDE. It highlights issues, bugs, vulnerabilities, and code smells directly in the code editor, allowing developers to immediately address them. PHP CodeSniffer, on the other hand, needs to be manually executed to analyze the code and generate reports. It does not offer real-time analysis within the IDE.
Integration with SonarQube and SonarCloud: SonarLint seamlessly integrates with SonarQube and SonarCloud, which are powerful platforms for managing and analyzing code quality across projects. The analysis results from SonarLint can be synchronized with SonarQube or SonarCloud, providing a centralized location for tracking code quality metrics, setting quality gates, and generating comprehensive reports. PHP CodeSniffer does not have direct integration with SonarQube or SonarCloud.

In summary, PHP CodeSniffer and SonarLint are both effective tools for static code analysis, but they differ in terms of integration with IDEs and build tools, rules and customizability, integration with CI/CD pipelines, language and framework support, real-time analysis and feedback, and integration with SonarQube and SonarCloud.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

SonarLint	PHP CodeSniffer
It is an IDE extension that helps you detect and fix quality issues as you write code. Like a spell checker, it squiggles flaws so that they can be fixed before committing code.	It tokenizes PHP, JavaScript and CSS files and detects violations of a defined set of coding standards. It is an essential development tool that ensures your code remains clean and consistent.
Bug detection;Instant feedback;Know what to do;Learn from your mistakes;Uncover old issues	Code Sniffing; Coding Standard Checking; Coding Standard Fixing
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 10.8K
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 1.5K
Stacks 175	Stacks 43
Followers 352	Followers 43
Votes 16	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 13 IDE Integration 3 Free Cons 3 Not Very User Friendly 3 Non contextual warnings	No community feedback yet
Integrations
Visual Studio Visual Studio Code Eclipse IntelliJ IDEA	JavaScript PHP

What are some alternatives to SonarLint, PHP CodeSniffer?

Code Climate

After each Git push, Code Climate analyzes your code for complexity, duplication, and common smells to determine changes in quality and surface technical debt hotspots.

Codacy

Codacy automates code reviews and monitors code quality on every commit and pull request on more than 40 programming languages reporting back the impact of every commit or PR, issues concerning code style, best practices and security.

Phabricator

Phabricator is a collection of open source web applications that help software companies build better software.

PullReview

PullReview helps Ruby and Rails developers to develop new features cleanly, on-time, and with confidence by automatically reviewing their code.

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit is a self-hosted pre-commit code review tool. It serves as a Git hosting server with option to comment incoming changes. It is highly configurable and extensible with default guarding policies, webhooks, project access control and more.

SonarQube

SonarQube provides an overview of the overall health of your source code and even more importantly, it highlights issues found on new code. With a Quality Gate set on your project, you will simply fix the Leak and start mechanically improving.

RuboCop

RuboCop is a Ruby static code analyzer. Out of the box it will enforce many of the guidelines outlined in the community Ruby Style Guide.

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io automatically and continuously tracks code quality with every GitHub or BitBucket commit and pull request, helping software developers save time in code reviews and efficiently tackle technical debt.

ESLint

A pluggable and configurable linter tool for identifying and reporting on patterns in JavaScript. Maintain your code quality with ease.

Amazon CodeGuru

It is a machine learning service for automated code reviews and application performance recommendations. It helps you find the most expensive lines of code that hurt application performance and keep you up all night troubleshooting, then gives you specific recommendations to fix or improve your code.

Related Comparisons

PHP CodeSniffer vs SonarLint: What are the differences?

Introduction:

Integration with IDEs and Build Tools: PHP CodeSniffer can be easily integrated into various IDEs like Visual Studio Code, PhpStorm, and more. It can also be integrated into build tools like Apache Ant, Apache Maven, and Phing. On the other hand, SonarLint provides plugins for widely used IDEs like IntelliJ IDEA, Eclipse, and Visual Studio, allowing developers to analyze code directly within the IDE.
Rules and Customizability: PHP CodeSniffer comes with a set of predefined rules that can be used out of the box. It allows developers to create custom rules tailored to their specific needs. SonarLint, on the other hand, provides a predefined set of rules but also offers a wider range of rules that can be accessed through SonarQube or SonarCloud for more comprehensive analysis. SonarLint allows some customization of rules but not to the extent of PHP CodeSniffer.
Integration with CI/CD Pipelines: PHP CodeSniffer can be easily integrated into continuous integration and delivery (CI/CD) pipelines, allowing code analysis to be performed automatically during the build process. It can generate customized reports in various formats like XML, JSON, and CheckStyle. SonarLint, on the other hand, is mainly designed to be used within the IDE and does not provide direct integration with CI/CD pipelines. However, the results from SonarLint analysis can be synchronized with SonarQube, which supports CI/CD integration.
Language and Framework Support: PHP CodeSniffer is primarily focused on analyzing PHP code and provides specific rules and guidelines for PHP coding standards like PSR-2. It also supports analyzing JavaScript and CSS files. On the other hand, SonarLint supports a wider range of programming languages including but not limited to Java, C#, C/C++, JavaScript, TypeScript, and Python. It also provides specific rules for popular frameworks like Spring, Hibernate, and Angular.
Real-Time Analysis and Feedback: SonarLint provides real-time analysis and feedback while developers are writing code in the IDE. It highlights issues, bugs, vulnerabilities, and code smells directly in the code editor, allowing developers to immediately address them. PHP CodeSniffer, on the other hand, needs to be manually executed to analyze the code and generate reports. It does not offer real-time analysis within the IDE.
Integration with SonarQube and SonarCloud: SonarLint seamlessly integrates with SonarQube and SonarCloud, which are powerful platforms for managing and analyzing code quality across projects. The analysis results from SonarLint can be synchronized with SonarQube or SonarCloud, providing a centralized location for tracking code quality metrics, setting quality gates, and generating comprehensive reports. PHP CodeSniffer does not have direct integration with SonarQube or SonarCloud.

PHP CodeSniffer vs SonarLint

Overview