Pippo vs Spring-Boot

Overview

Spring Boot

Stacks26.7K

Followers24.3K

Votes1.0K

GitHub Stars78.9K

Forks41.6K

Pippo

Stacks2

Followers10

Votes6

Pippo vs Spring-Boot: What are the differences?

Introduction:

Pippo and Spring-Boot are two popular Java web frameworks used for developing web applications. They have their own unique features and strengths that cater to different requirements of developers.

Architecture: Pippo follows a micro framework approach with minimalistic design and flexibility, making it lightweight and easy to use for small projects. On the other hand, Spring Boot is a full-fledged opinionated framework, providing a comprehensive set of tools and libraries out-of-the-box for building enterprise-grade applications.
Configuration: Pippo relies on Java-based configuration and annotations for setting up and configuring the web application. In contrast, Spring Boot emphasizes convention over configuration and provides extensive support for externalized configuration through properties files or YAML files.
Application Packaging: Pippo applications are packaged as standard Java JAR files along with dependencies, making deployment simple. Spring Boot applications, however, can be packaged as standalone executable JAR files, which embed an embedded server to run the application without requiring an external server setup.
Dependency Injection: Spring Boot heavily leverages the Spring Framework's powerful dependency injection capabilities, making it easy to manage objects and their dependencies within an application. Pippo, on the other hand, provides basic support for dependency injection but lacks the advanced features and configurability of Spring Boot.
Testing Support: Spring Boot offers excellent support for both unit testing and integration testing through its testing annotations and utilities, allowing developers to easily write test cases for their applications. In comparison, Pippo provides minimal testing support, requiring developers to rely on external libraries or frameworks for comprehensive testing capabilities.
Community and Ecosystem: Spring Boot enjoys a large and active community with extensive documentation, tutorials, and third-party libraries and plugins available for developers to enhance their applications. Pippo, while being a solid framework, has a smaller community and ecosystem in comparison to Spring Boot.

In Summary, Pippo and Spring-Boot differ in their architecture, configuration approach, application packaging, dependency injection, testing support, and community size and ecosystem.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Spring Boot, Pippo

Eva

Fullstack developer

Jul 28, 2020

Needs adviceon

Java

Spring Boot

JavaScript

Hello, I am a fullstack web developer. I have been working for a company with Java/ Spring Boot and client-side JavaScript(mainly jQuery, some AngularJS) for the past 4 years. As I wish to now work as a freelancer, I am faced with a dilemma: which stack to choose given my current knowledge and the state of the market?

I've heard PHP is very popular in the freelance world. I don't know PHP. However, I'm sure it wouldn't be difficult to learn since it has many similarities with Java (OOP). It seems to me that Laravel has similarities with Spring Boot (it's MVC and OOP). Also, people say Laravel works well with Vue.js, which is my favorite JS framework.

On the other hand, I already know the Javascript language, and I like Vue.js, so I figure I could go the fullstack Javascript route with ExpressJS. However, I am not sure if these techs are ripe for freelancing (with regards to RAD, stability, reliability, security, costs, etc.) Is it true that Express is almost always used with MongoDB? Because my experience is mostly with SQL databases.

The projects I would like to work on are custom web applications/websites for small businesses. I have developed custom ERPs before and found that Java was a good fit, except for it taking a long time to develop. I cannot make a choice, and I am constantly switching between trying PHP and Node.js/Express. Any real-world advice would be welcome! I would love to find a stack that I enjoy while doing meaningful freelance coding.

826k views826k

Comments

Slimane

Jul 9, 2020

Needs adviceon

Spring Boot

NestJS

Node.js

I am currently planning to build a project from scratch. I will be using Angular as front-end framework, but for the back-end I am not sure which framework to use between Spring Boot and NestJS. I have worked with Spring Boot before, but my new project contains a lot of I/O operations, in fact it will show a daily report. I thought about the new Spring Web Reactive Framework but given the idea that Node.js is the most popular on handling non blocking I/O I am planning to start learning NestJS since it is based on Angular philosophy and TypeScript which I am familiar with. Looking forward to hear from you dear Community.

917k views917k

Comments

Milan

May 6, 2020

Needs adviceon

Spring Boot

Node.js

React

Hi, I am looking to select tech stack for front end and back end development. Considering Spring Boot vs Node.js for developing microservices. Front end tech stack is selected as React framework. Both of them are equally good for me, long term perspective most of services will be more based on I/O vs heavy computing. Leaning toward node.js, but will require team to learn this tech stack, so little hesitant.

650k views650k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Spring Boot	Pippo
Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.	It's an open source (Apache License) micro web framework in Java, with minimal dependencies and a quick learning curve. The goal of this project is to create a micro web framework in Java that should be easy to use and hack. Pippo can be used in small and medium applications and also in applications based on micro services architecture.
Statistics
GitHub Stars 78.9K	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 41.6K	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 26.7K	Stacks 2
Followers 24.3K	Followers 10
Votes 1.0K	Votes 6
Pros & Cons
Pros 149 Powerful and handy 134 Easy setup 128 Java 90 Spring 85 Fast Cons 23 Heavy weight 18 Annotation ceremony 13 Java 11 Many config files needed 5 Reactive	Pros 1 Open source 1 CSRF Support 1 Optional integration with Metrics (Ganglia,...) 1 Integration with Spring & CDI & Guice 1 Easy setup
Integrations
Spring Java	Java

What are some alternatives to Spring Boot, Pippo?

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

ExpressJS

Express is a minimal and flexible node.js web application framework, providing a robust set of features for building single and multi-page, and hybrid web applications.

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Flyway vs Liquibase

Pippo vs Spring-Boot: What are the differences?

Introduction:

Pippo and Spring-Boot are two popular Java web frameworks used for developing web applications. They have their own unique features and strengths that cater to different requirements of developers.

Architecture: Pippo follows a micro framework approach with minimalistic design and flexibility, making it lightweight and easy to use for small projects. On the other hand, Spring Boot is a full-fledged opinionated framework, providing a comprehensive set of tools and libraries out-of-the-box for building enterprise-grade applications.
Configuration: Pippo relies on Java-based configuration and annotations for setting up and configuring the web application. In contrast, Spring Boot emphasizes convention over configuration and provides extensive support for externalized configuration through properties files or YAML files.
Application Packaging: Pippo applications are packaged as standard Java JAR files along with dependencies, making deployment simple. Spring Boot applications, however, can be packaged as standalone executable JAR files, which embed an embedded server to run the application without requiring an external server setup.
Dependency Injection: Spring Boot heavily leverages the Spring Framework's powerful dependency injection capabilities, making it easy to manage objects and their dependencies within an application. Pippo, on the other hand, provides basic support for dependency injection but lacks the advanced features and configurability of Spring Boot.
Testing Support: Spring Boot offers excellent support for both unit testing and integration testing through its testing annotations and utilities, allowing developers to easily write test cases for their applications. In comparison, Pippo provides minimal testing support, requiring developers to rely on external libraries or frameworks for comprehensive testing capabilities.
Community and Ecosystem: Spring Boot enjoys a large and active community with extensive documentation, tutorials, and third-party libraries and plugins available for developers to enhance their applications. Pippo, while being a solid framework, has a smaller community and ecosystem in comparison to Spring Boot.

In Summary, Pippo and Spring-Boot differ in their architecture, configuration approach, application packaging, dependency injection, testing support, and community size and ecosystem.