Play vs Sane Stack: What are the differences?
Play and Sane Stack can be categorized as "Frameworks (Full Stack)" tools.
Play and Sane Stack are both open source tools. Play with 11.2K GitHub stars and 3.77K forks on GitHub appears to be more popular than Sane Stack with 479 GitHub stars and 53 GitHub forks.
What is Play?
What is Sane Stack?
Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Sign up to add, upvote and see more prosMake informed product decisions
What are the cons of using Sane Stack?
What companies use Sane Stack?
Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions
Some may wonder why did we choose Grails ? Really good question :) We spent quite some time to evaluate what framework to go with and the battle was between Play Scala and Grails ( Groovy ). We have enough experience with both and, to be honest, I absolutely in love with Scala; however, the tipping point for us was the potential speed of development. Grails allows much faster development pace than Play , and as of right now this is the most important parameter. We might convert later though. Also, worth mentioning, by default Grails comes with Gradle as a build tool, so why change?
Play is a central framework/component/library (not sure what to call things these days) in Scala. We <3 Scala, and therefore we <3 Play.
Play is on of several frameworks we are prototyping and vetting for various public-facing websites, and may ultimately be the framework behind the main datapile.io website.
I used Play to build a configuration UI for the service, which let you create and manage the menus (a hierarchical tree of options and actions).