Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Playwright

453
548
+ 1
77
PreFlight

2
20
+ 1
0
Add tool

Playwright vs PreFlight: What are the differences?

  1. Programming Language: Playwright supports JavaScript, Python, and C# while PreFlight primarily focuses on JavaScript, providing extensive support for this language through its libraries and tools.
  2. Browser Compatibility: Playwright offers cross-browser support for Chrome, Firefox, and WebKit, enabling testing on multiple browsers, whereas Preflight has a strong emphasis on Chrome and its features, providing tailored solutions for this browser.
  3. Testing Automation: Playwright is known for its robust testing automation capabilities, offering features such as parallel testing and integration with various testing frameworks, while PreFlight primarily focuses on manual testing and exploratory testing workflows.
  4. Community Support: Playwright has a large and active community of developers contributing to its growth and offering support through forums and documentation, while PreFlight has a smaller community size but provides dedicated support through its official channels.
  5. Integration with CI/CD Pipeline: Playwright seamlessly integrates with popular CI/CD tools like Jenkins, GitHub Actions, and Azure DevOps, facilitating continuous testing processes, whereas PreFlight may require additional configuration for seamless integration with certain CI/CD pipelines.
  6. Performance Testing: Playwright includes features for performance testing, offering insights into page load times, network requests, and other performance metrics, while PreFlight may not have specialized tools for performance testing and optimization.

In Summary, Playwright and PreFlight differ in their supported programming languages, browser compatibility, automation capabilities, community support, integration with CI/CD pipelines, and performance testing features.

Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of Playwright
Pros of PreFlight
  • 14
    Cross browser
  • 10
    Open source
  • 9
    Test Runner with Playwright/test
  • 7
    Promise based
  • 7
    Well documented
  • 5
    Integrate your POMs as extensible fixtures
  • 5
    Execute tests in parallel
  • 5
    API Testing
  • 4
    Python Support
  • 4
    Capture videos, screenshots and other artifacts on fail
  • 3
    Inbuild reporters html,line,dot,json
  • 3
    Context isolation
  • 1
    Fastest
    Be the first to leave a pro

    Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

    Cons of Playwright
    Cons of PreFlight
    • 12
      Less help
    • 3
      Node based
    • 2
      Does not execute outside of browser
      Be the first to leave a con

      Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

      - No public GitHub repository available -

      What is Playwright?

      It is a Node library to automate the Chromium, WebKit and Firefox browsers with a single API. It enables cross-browser web automation that is ever-green, capable, reliable and fast.

      What is PreFlight?

      Record tests while using your product and process the test then you can run them on all the popular browsers, across Windows & MacOS.

      Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

      What companies use Playwright?
      What companies use PreFlight?
        No companies found
        See which teams inside your own company are using Playwright or PreFlight.
        Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn More

        Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

        What tools integrate with Playwright?
        What tools integrate with PreFlight?

        Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

        What are some alternatives to Playwright and PreFlight?
        Puppeteer
        Puppeteer is a Node library which provides a high-level API to control headless Chrome over the DevTools Protocol. It can also be configured to use full (non-headless) Chrome.
        Selenium
        Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that. Boring web-based administration tasks can (and should!) also be automated as well.
        Protractor
        Protractor is an end-to-end test framework for Angular and AngularJS applications. Protractor runs tests against your application running in a real browser, interacting with it as a user would.
        Cypress
        Cypress is a front end automated testing application created for the modern web. Cypress is built on a new architecture and runs in the same run-loop as the application being tested. As a result Cypress provides better, faster, and more reliable testing for anything that runs in a browser. Cypress works on any front-end framework or website.
        TestCafe
        It is a pure node.js end-to-end solution for testing web apps. It takes care of all the stages: starting browsers, running tests, gathering test results and generating reports.
        See all alternatives