Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!


+ 1

+ 1
Add tool

Playwright vs Reflect: What are the differences?


Playwright and Reflect are both powerful tools for browser automation testing, but they have key differences that set them apart.

  1. Programming Language Support: Playwright supports multiple programming languages such as JavaScript, Python, and C#, whereas Reflect is primarily focused on JavaScript.
  2. Cross-Browser Testing: Playwright allows for cross-browser testing on Chromium, WebKit, and Firefox, while Reflect is more geared towards Chrome automation.
  3. Test Integration: Playwright seamlessly integrates with popular testing frameworks like Jest and Mocha, whereas Reflect provides its own testing framework for automation.
  4. Browser Contexts: Playwright creates isolated browser contexts for each test, enabling parallel testing, while Reflect uses shared browser instances which may impact test reliability.
  5. Community Support: Playwright has a larger and more active community for support and updates compared to Reflect, ensuring a more robust testing environment.
  6. Documentation: Playwright offers comprehensive and detailed documentation, making it easier for users to understand and utilize the tool effectively compared to Reflect's lacking in-depth documentation.

In Summary, Playwright excels in providing cross-language support, broader browser compatibility, seamless integration with testing frameworks, isolated browser contexts for parallel testing, a strong community for support, and detailed documentation compared to Reflect, which is primarily focused on JavaScript, Chrome automation, in-house testing frameworks, shared browser instances, limited community support, and insufficient documentation.

Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of Playwright
Pros of Reflect
  • 14
    Cross browser
  • 10
    Open source
  • 9
    Test Runner with Playwright/test
  • 7
    Promise based
  • 7
    Well documented
  • 5
    Integrate your POMs as extensible fixtures
  • 5
    Execute tests in parallel
  • 5
    API Testing
  • 4
    Python Support
  • 4
    Capture videos, screenshots and other artifacts on fail
  • 3
    Inbuild reporters html,line,dot,json
  • 3
    Context isolation
  • 1
    Be the first to leave a pro

    Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

    Cons of Playwright
    Cons of Reflect
    • 12
      Less help
    • 3
      Node based
    • 2
      Does not execute outside of browser
      Be the first to leave a con

      Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

      - No public GitHub repository available -

      What is Playwright?

      It is a Node library to automate the Chromium, WebKit and Firefox browsers with a single API. It enables cross-browser web automation that is ever-green, capable, reliable and fast.

      What is Reflect?

      It is a tool that helps you test any website without writing any code or installing anything. All you need to create a test is a URL. Our cloud-based browser allows you to interact with your website just like a normal browser. Behind the scenes, it captures all of your actions and builds a repeatable test script. When you're finished, you can run that test script whenever you want within our automated platform. So, if you can use your site, you can test your site.

      Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

      What companies use Playwright?
      What companies use Reflect?
      See which teams inside your own company are using Playwright or Reflect.
      Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn More

      Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

      What tools integrate with Playwright?
      What tools integrate with Reflect?

      Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

      What are some alternatives to Playwright and Reflect?
      Puppeteer is a Node library which provides a high-level API to control headless Chrome over the DevTools Protocol. It can also be configured to use full (non-headless) Chrome.
      Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that. Boring web-based administration tasks can (and should!) also be automated as well.
      Protractor is an end-to-end test framework for Angular and AngularJS applications. Protractor runs tests against your application running in a real browser, interacting with it as a user would.
      Cypress is a front end automated testing application created for the modern web. Cypress is built on a new architecture and runs in the same run-loop as the application being tested. As a result Cypress provides better, faster, and more reliable testing for anything that runs in a browser. Cypress works on any front-end framework or website.
      It is a pure node.js end-to-end solution for testing web apps. It takes care of all the stages: starting browsers, running tests, gathering test results and generating reports.
      See all alternatives