Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!


+ 1

+ 1
Add tool

Playwright vs Wallaby.js: What are the differences?


Playwright and Wallaby.js are both popular tools used for testing web applications. While they share some similarities, they differ in several key aspects that cater to different needs and preferences.

  1. Browser Support: Playwright supports multiple browsers, including Chrome, Firefox, and WebKit, allowing developers to test their applications across different environments. On the other hand, Wallaby.js primarily focuses on supporting only the Chrome browser, which may limit its versatility in terms of browser compatibility testing.

  2. Language Support: Playwright is compatible with various programming languages such as JavaScript, Python, and C#, providing flexibility for developers to choose the language that best suits their needs. In contrast, Wallaby.js is more focused on supporting JavaScript and TypeScript, which may be a limiting factor for developers working with other languages.

  3. Community and Ecosystem: Playwright has a larger and more active community, offering extensive documentation, tutorials, and community support for developers. This robust ecosystem provides a wealth of resources to help users get started with Playwright and troubleshoot any issues they may encounter. Wallaby.js, while also supported by a dedicated community, may not have the same level of resources and support available as Playwright.

  4. Testing Capabilities: Playwright is known for its robust testing capabilities, including cross-browser testing, visual testing, and accessibility testing, making it a comprehensive solution for testing web applications. Wallaby.js, on the other hand, is primarily focused on test runner capabilities, providing efficient test execution and debugging tools without the additional testing features offered by Playwright.

  5. Integration with Testing Frameworks: Playwright is designed to work seamlessly with popular testing frameworks such as Jest, Mocha, and Jasmine, allowing developers to easily incorporate Playwright into their existing testing workflows. In contrast, Wallaby.js is more closely integrated with specific testing frameworks like Jasmine and QUnit, potentially requiring developers to adjust their testing setup to accommodate Wallaby.js.

  6. License and Pricing: Playwright is an open-source tool released under the Apache 2.0 license, making it free for commercial and non-commercial use. In contrast, Wallaby.js offers both free and paid plans, with certain advanced features available only in the paid version. This difference in licensing and pricing models may influence developers' decisions when choosing between Playwright and Wallaby.js.

In Summary, Playwright and Wallaby.js differ in terms of browser support, language compatibility, community support, testing capabilities, integration with testing frameworks, and licensing/pricing models, catering to different needs and preferences of developers.

Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of Playwright
Pros of Wallaby.js
  • 14
    Cross browser
  • 10
    Open source
  • 9
    Test Runner with Playwright/test
  • 7
    Promise based
  • 7
    Well documented
  • 5
    Integrate your POMs as extensible fixtures
  • 5
    Execute tests in parallel
  • 5
    API Testing
  • 4
    Python Support
  • 4
    Capture videos, screenshots and other artifacts on fail
  • 3
    Inbuild reporters html,line,dot,json
  • 3
    Context isolation
  • 1
    Be the first to leave a pro

    Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

    Cons of Playwright
    Cons of Wallaby.js
    • 12
      Less help
    • 3
      Node based
    • 2
      Does not execute outside of browser
      Be the first to leave a con

      Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

      - No public GitHub repository available -

      What is Playwright?

      It is a Node library to automate the Chromium, WebKit and Firefox browsers with a single API. It enables cross-browser web automation that is ever-green, capable, reliable and fast.

      What is Wallaby.js?

      It is an intelligent test runner for JavaScript that continuously runs your tests. It reports code coverage and other results directly to your code editor immediately as you change your code.

      Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

      What companies use Playwright?
      What companies use Wallaby.js?
      See which teams inside your own company are using Playwright or Wallaby.js.
      Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn More

      Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

      What tools integrate with Playwright?
      What tools integrate with Wallaby.js?

      Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

      What are some alternatives to Playwright and Wallaby.js?
      Puppeteer is a Node library which provides a high-level API to control headless Chrome over the DevTools Protocol. It can also be configured to use full (non-headless) Chrome.
      Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that. Boring web-based administration tasks can (and should!) also be automated as well.
      Protractor is an end-to-end test framework for Angular and AngularJS applications. Protractor runs tests against your application running in a real browser, interacting with it as a user would.
      Cypress is a front end automated testing application created for the modern web. Cypress is built on a new architecture and runs in the same run-loop as the application being tested. As a result Cypress provides better, faster, and more reliable testing for anything that runs in a browser. Cypress works on any front-end framework or website.
      It is a pure node.js end-to-end solution for testing web apps. It takes care of all the stages: starting browsers, running tests, gathering test results and generating reports.
      See all alternatives