StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Front End Frameworks
  5. Polymer vs React Storybook

Polymer vs React Storybook

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Polymer
Polymer
Stacks557
Followers463
Votes122
GitHub Stars22.1K
Forks2.0K
React Storybook
React Storybook
Stacks635
Followers355
Votes0

Polymer vs React Storybook: What are the differences?

Polymer and React Storybook are two popular tools used in web development for building user interfaces. Each has its unique benefits and features that cater to different use cases.
  1. Component Structure: In Polymer, components are built using Web Components, allowing for encapsulation and reusability. React Storybook, on the other hand, focuses on showcasing React components in isolation, aiding in the development and testing process.

  2. Environment: Polymer is designed to work seamlessly with the Polymer CLI and Polymer project structure, providing a complete ecosystem for web development. In contrast, React Storybook is a standalone tool that can be integrated into existing React projects without requiring a specific project structure.

  3. Focus: Polymer is centered around building web components and encapsulating functionality within a single component. React Storybook, however, is primarily used for developing UI components in isolation for better testing and reusability.

  4. Community Support: React Storybook has a larger and more active community compared to Polymer, resulting in a broader range of plugins, add-ons, and community support. This makes it easier to find solutions to common issues and stay up to date with the latest developments.

  5. Performance: Polymer's focus on Web Components can sometimes lead to performance overhead due to the limitations and complexities of the Web Components polyfills. React Storybook, being more lightweight and focused on React components, generally has better performance when dealing with UI components.

  6. Development Flexibility: React Storybook allows developers to develop UI components in isolation, which promotes a more flexible and modular development approach. On the other hand, Polymer's focus on Web Components may limit the flexibility in terms of integrating with other frameworks or libraries.

In Summary, Polymer and React Storybook offer different approaches to component development, with Polymer focusing on Web Components and encapsulation, while React Storybook emphasizes showcasing and testing React components in isolation. Each tool has its strengths and weaknesses, catering to different development needs.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Polymer, React Storybook

Gericke
Gericke

Jul 27, 2020

Needs adviceon.NET Core.NET CoreJavaScriptJavaScriptReactReact

Hi,

I am looking into solutions for reusable components for an existing #MVC project which is build on .NET Core. Currently some functionality is being reuses via JavaScript. I have React experience so I know I can create React components and then reference it on the MVC app. The only problem is I do not know the full extent of it as the current app uses a lot of 3rd party libraries, not sure how that will effect React components. I am currently looking into WebComponents which is also another way for creating reusable components and it is compatible with any JavaScript library based on what I have seen on the website. Also to take in consideration that it should cause a re-write of the system.

So my question is, to future-proof reusable components, which will be best React or Web Components? And which will be more reliable to use with 3rd party libraries?

49.1k views49.1k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Polymer
Polymer
React Storybook
React Storybook

Polymer is a new type of library for the web, designed to leverage the existing browser infrastructure to provide the encapsulation and extendability currently only available in JS libraries. Polymer is based on a set of future technologies, including Shadow DOM, Custom Elements and Model Driven Views. Currently these technologies are implemented as polyfills or shims, but as browsers adopt these features natively, the platform code that drives Polymer evacipates, leaving only the value-adds.

You just load your UI components into the React Storybook and start developing them. This functionality allows you to develop UI components rapidly without worrying about the app. It will improve your team’s collaboration and feedback loop.

-
Isolated environment for your components (with the use of various iframe tactics);Hot module reloading (even for functional stateless components);Works with any app (whether it's Redux, Relay or Meteor);Support for CSS (whether it's plain old CSS, CSS modules or something fancy);Clean and fast user interface;Runs inside your project (so, it uses your app's NPM modules and babel configurations out of the box);Serves static files (if you host static files inside your app);Deploy the whole storybook as a static app;Extendable as necessary (support for custom webpack loaders and plugins)
Statistics
GitHub Stars
22.1K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
2.0K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
557
Stacks
635
Followers
463
Followers
355
Votes
122
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 52
    Web components
  • 30
    Material design
  • 14
    HTML
  • 13
    Components
  • 5
    Open source
Cons
  • 1
    Last version is like 2 years ago? that's totally rad
Cons
  • 5
    Hard dependency to Babel loader
Integrations
No integrations available
React
React
React Native
React Native
Vue.js
Vue.js

What are some alternatives to Polymer, React Storybook?

Bootstrap

Bootstrap

Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.

Foundation

Foundation

Foundation is the most advanced responsive front-end framework in the world. You can quickly prototype and build sites or apps that work on any kind of device with Foundation, which includes layout constructs (like a fully responsive grid), elements and best practices.

Semantic UI

Semantic UI

Semantic empowers designers and developers by creating a shared vocabulary for UI.

Materialize

Materialize

A CSS Framework based on material design.

Material Design for Angular

Material Design for Angular

Material Design is a specification for a unified system of visual, motion, and interaction design that adapts across different devices. Our goal is to deliver a lean, lightweight set of AngularJS-native UI elements that implement the material design system for use in Angular SPAs.

Material-UI

Material-UI

Material UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design.

Blazor

Blazor

Blazor is a .NET web framework that runs in any browser. You author Blazor apps using C#/Razor and HTML.

Quasar Framework

Quasar Framework

Build responsive Single Page Apps, SSR Apps, PWAs, Hybrid Mobile Apps and Electron Apps, all using the same codebase!, powered with Vue.

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js presets all the configuration needed to make your development of a Vue.js application enjoyable. You can use Nuxt.js for SSR, SPA, Static Generated, PWA and more.

UIkIt

UIkIt

UIkit gives you a comprehensive collection of HTML, CSS, and JS components which is simple to use, easy to customize and extendable.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase