StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Infrastructure as a Service
  4. Virtualization Platform
  5. Portainer vs VirtualBox

Portainer vs VirtualBox

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

VirtualBox
VirtualBox
Stacks31.1K
Followers25.6K
Votes1.1K
Portainer
Portainer
Stacks507
Followers842
Votes146

Portainer vs VirtualBox: What are the differences?

<Write Introduction here>

1. **Deployment Approach**: Portainer is a container management platform that simplifies container deployment and management, while VirtualBox is a virtualization tool used to create and manage virtual machines. Portainer focuses solely on containers, making it lightweight and specialized, whereas VirtualBox allows users to create various types of virtual machines.
2. **User Interface**: Portainer provides a user-friendly web interface for managing containers, allowing users to easily monitor and deploy containers through a graphical interface. In contrast, VirtualBox offers a desktop application with a more traditional virtual machine management interface, providing a range of customization options.
3. **Resource Utilization**: Portainer is known for its efficiency in resource utilization, consuming minimal resources to manage containers effectively. On the other hand, VirtualBox requires more system resources due to its capability of running multiple virtual machines concurrently, leading to higher resource consumption.
4. **Integration with Docker**: Portainer is tightly integrated with Docker, supporting Docker containers natively and providing a seamless management experience for Docker users. VirtualBox, although it can run Docker containers using a Linux guest VM, does not have the same level of integration and optimization for Docker as Portainer.
5. **Networking Capabilities**: Portainer offers a simplified approach to container networking, making it easier for users to set up and manage network configurations within containers. VirtualBox, while providing networking features for virtual machines, is more complex in terms of setting up networks and may require more manual configuration.
6. **Target Audience**: Portainer is designed for developers and IT professionals who work predominantly with containers and require an efficient tool for container management. On the other hand, VirtualBox caters to a broader audience, including developers, testers, and system administrators, who need to work with various types of virtual machines for testing or development purposes.

In Summary, the key differences between Portainer and VirtualBox lie in their deployment approach, user interface, resource utilization, integration with Docker, networking capabilities, and target audience. While Portainer focuses on lightweight container management, VirtualBox offers a broader range of virtualization options. Markdown

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

VirtualBox
VirtualBox
Portainer
Portainer

VirtualBox is a powerful x86 and AMD64/Intel64 virtualization product for enterprise as well as home use. Not only is VirtualBox an extremely feature rich, high performance product for enterprise customers, it is also the only professional solution that is freely available as Open Source Software under the terms of the GNU General Public License (GPL) version 2.

It is a universal container management tool. It works with Kubernetes, Docker, Docker Swarm and Azure ACI. It allows you to manage containers without needing to know platform-specific code.

Portability;No hardware virtualization required;Guest Additions: shared folders, seamless windows, 3D virtualization;Great hardware support;Multigeneration branched snapshots;VM groups;Clean architecture; unprecedented modularity;Remote machine display
Docker management; Docker UI; Docker cluster management; Swarm visualizer; Authentication; User Access Control; Docker container management; Docker service management; Docker overview; Docker console; Docker swarm status; Docker image management; Docker network management; Docker dashboard; Remote HTTP API; Automation
Statistics
Stacks
31.1K
Stacks
507
Followers
25.6K
Followers
842
Votes
1.1K
Votes
146
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 358
    Free
  • 231
    Easy
  • 169
    Default for vagrant
  • 110
    Fast
  • 73
    Starts quickly
Pros
  • 36
    Simple
  • 27
    Great UI
  • 19
    Friendly
  • 12
    Easy to setup, gives a practical interface for Docker
  • 11
    Because it just works, super simple yet powerful
Integrations
No integrations available
Docker Swarm
Docker Swarm
Docker Secrets
Docker Secrets
Auth0
Auth0
Kubernetes
Kubernetes
Docker
Docker

What are some alternatives to VirtualBox, Portainer?

Kubernetes

Kubernetes

Kubernetes is an open source orchestration system for Docker containers. It handles scheduling onto nodes in a compute cluster and actively manages workloads to ensure that their state matches the users declared intentions.

Rancher

Rancher

Rancher is an open source container management platform that includes full distributions of Kubernetes, Apache Mesos and Docker Swarm, and makes it simple to operate container clusters on any cloud or infrastructure platform.

Docker Compose

Docker Compose

With Compose, you define a multi-container application in a single file, then spin your application up in a single command which does everything that needs to be done to get it running.

Docker Swarm

Docker Swarm

Swarm serves the standard Docker API, so any tool which already communicates with a Docker daemon can use Swarm to transparently scale to multiple hosts: Dokku, Compose, Krane, Deis, DockerUI, Shipyard, Drone, Jenkins... and, of course, the Docker client itself.

Tutum

Tutum

Tutum lets developers easily manage and run lightweight, portable, self-sufficient containers from any application. AWS-like control, Heroku-like ease. The same container that a developer builds and tests on a laptop can run at scale in Tutum.

Codefresh

Codefresh

Automate and parallelize testing. Codefresh allows teams to spin up on-demand compositions to run unit and integration tests as part of the continuous integration process. Jenkins integration allows more complex pipelines.

Proxmox VE

Proxmox VE

It is a complete open-source platform for all-inclusive enterprise virtualization that tightly integrates KVM hypervisor and LXC containers, software-defined storage and networking functionality on a single platform, and easily manages high availability clusters and disaster recovery tools with the built-in web management interface.

VMware vSphere

VMware vSphere

vSphere is the world’s leading server virtualization platform. Run fewer servers and reduce capital and operating costs using VMware vSphere to build a cloud computing infrastructure.

CAST.AI

CAST.AI

It is an AI-driven cloud optimization platform for Kubernetes. Instantly cut your cloud bill, prevent downtime, and 10X the power of DevOps.

k3s

k3s

Certified Kubernetes distribution designed for production workloads in unattended, resource-constrained, remote locations or inside IoT appliances. Supports something as small as a Raspberry Pi or as large as an AWS a1.4xlarge 32GiB server.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana