StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Databases
  4. Databases
  5. Pouchdb vs RxDB

Pouchdb vs RxDB

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Pouchdb
Pouchdb
Stacks148
Followers242
Votes6
GitHub Stars17.5K
Forks1.5K
RxDB
RxDB
Stacks59
Followers179
Votes63
GitHub Stars22.8K
Forks1.1K

Pouchdb vs RxDB: What are the differences?

Introduction

PouchDB and RxDB are two popular NoSQL databases used for web applications, but they have distinct features and functionalities that set them apart. In this article, we will explore the key differences between PouchDB and RxDB.

  1. Data Replication: PouchDB is primarily designed for client-side storage, enabling seamless data replication with CouchDB or another PouchDB instance on the server. It utilizes the built-in sync capabilities to synchronize changes bidirectionally. On the other hand, RxDB, which stands for Reactive Database, builds upon PouchDB and provides additional features like real-time synchronization, event-based observables, and offline capabilities.

  2. Querying and Indexing: PouchDB offers a powerful querying mechanism by using MapReduce functions. It allows you to create complex queries for retrieving data from the database. In contrast, RxDB introduces RxQuery, a way to perform queries using the ReactiveX pattern. It provides a fluent API to filter, sort, and modify queried data in a reactive manner.

  3. Modeling and Schema: PouchDB does not enforce any schema or provide easy ways to define models. It allows dynamic insertion of any JSON data. On the other hand, RxDB focuses on structured data and supports schema definition using the "RxSchema" module. It enables you to define data models with strict validation, default values, and methods for data manipulation.

  4. Change Handling: PouchDB handles replication conflicts by using conflict resolution algorithms based on document revision numbers. In contrast, RxDB employs a conflict resolution strategy called "last write wins." It keeps track of document versions and resolves conflicts by considering the latest modification.

  5. Observables and Event Handling: PouchDB does not include built-in support for reactive programming and event-based observables. In contrast, RxDB integrates with the popular RxJS library, providing powerful observables and event handling capabilities. It allows you to reactively subscribe to database changes, query results, and perform various transformations on data streams.

  6. Plugin Ecosystem: PouchDB has a rich plugin ecosystem, offering a wide range of additional functionalities and integrations. These plugins can extend PouchDB's capabilities, such as encryption, full-text search, geospatial indexing, and more. RxDB inherits PouchDB's plugin ecosystem, allowing you to leverage various plugins seamlessly.

In summary, PouchDB is focused on data replication and client-side storage, while RxDB builds upon PouchDB to provide additional features like real-time synchronization, reactive querying, schema enforcement, and event-based observables. RxDB is an excellent choice for applications requiring offline capabilities and reactive data streams.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Pouchdb
Pouchdb
RxDB
RxDB

PouchDB enables applications to store data locally while offline, then synchronize it with CouchDB and compatible servers when the application is back online, keeping the user's data in sync no matter where they next login.

💻 📱 Reactive, serverless, client-side, offline-first database in javascript. Client-Side Database for Browsers, NodeJS, electron, cordova, react-native and every other javascript-runtime.

Cross browser compatibility; Lightweight; Easy to learn; Open source
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
17.5K
GitHub Stars
22.8K
GitHub Forks
1.5K
GitHub Forks
1.1K
Stacks
148
Stacks
59
Followers
242
Followers
179
Votes
6
Votes
63
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 2
    Offline cache
  • 1
    Repication
  • 1
    JSON
  • 1
    Very fast
  • 1
    Free
Pros
  • 15
    Good documentation
  • 13
    Subscription to queries
  • 11
    Example projects
  • 10
    Works
  • 10
    Typescript support
Cons
  • 4
    Bulk operation for updates and other operation
Integrations
No integrations available
CouchDB
CouchDB
Cloudant
Cloudant
React
React
Angular
Angular
Ionic
Ionic
Vue.js
Vue.js

What are some alternatives to Pouchdb, RxDB?

MongoDB

MongoDB

MongoDB stores data in JSON-like documents that can vary in structure, offering a dynamic, flexible schema. MongoDB was also designed for high availability and scalability, with built-in replication and auto-sharding.

MySQL

MySQL

The MySQL software delivers a very fast, multi-threaded, multi-user, and robust SQL (Structured Query Language) database server. MySQL Server is intended for mission-critical, heavy-load production systems as well as for embedding into mass-deployed software.

PostgreSQL

PostgreSQL

PostgreSQL is an advanced object-relational database management system that supports an extended subset of the SQL standard, including transactions, foreign keys, subqueries, triggers, user-defined types and functions.

Microsoft SQL Server

Microsoft SQL Server

Microsoft® SQL Server is a database management and analysis system for e-commerce, line-of-business, and data warehousing solutions.

SQLite

SQLite

SQLite is an embedded SQL database engine. Unlike most other SQL databases, SQLite does not have a separate server process. SQLite reads and writes directly to ordinary disk files. A complete SQL database with multiple tables, indices, triggers, and views, is contained in a single disk file.

Cassandra

Cassandra

Partitioning means that Cassandra can distribute your data across multiple machines in an application-transparent matter. Cassandra will automatically repartition as machines are added and removed from the cluster. Row store means that like relational databases, Cassandra organizes data by rows and columns. The Cassandra Query Language (CQL) is a close relative of SQL.

Memcached

Memcached

Memcached is an in-memory key-value store for small chunks of arbitrary data (strings, objects) from results of database calls, API calls, or page rendering.

MariaDB

MariaDB

Started by core members of the original MySQL team, MariaDB actively works with outside developers to deliver the most featureful, stable, and sanely licensed open SQL server in the industry. MariaDB is designed as a drop-in replacement of MySQL(R) with more features, new storage engines, fewer bugs, and better performance.

RethinkDB

RethinkDB

RethinkDB is built to store JSON documents, and scale to multiple machines with very little effort. It has a pleasant query language that supports really useful queries like table joins and group by, and is easy to setup and learn.

ArangoDB

ArangoDB

A distributed free and open-source database with a flexible data model for documents, graphs, and key-values. Build high performance applications using a convenient SQL-like query language or JavaScript extensions.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase