StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Front End Frameworks
  5. PrimeFaces vs Quasar Framework

PrimeFaces vs Quasar Framework

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

PrimeFaces
PrimeFaces
Stacks111
Followers190
Votes4
Quasar Framework
Quasar Framework
Stacks451
Followers771
Votes404
GitHub Stars26.9K
Forks3.7K

PrimeFaces vs Quasar Framework: What are the differences?

1. **UI Components**: PrimeFaces is a JavaServer Faces (JSF) library that provides a wide variety of UI components, such as buttons, menus, and data tables, while Quasar Framework is a Vue.js framework that offers a different set of components tailored for Vue.js applications. 2. **Technology Stack**: PrimeFaces is tightly integrated with JSF, which is a server-side Java web framework, whereas Quasar Framework is built on top of Vue.js, a popular JavaScript framework for building user interfaces. 3. **Mobile Development**: Quasar Framework has built-in support for building mobile applications using Cordova or Capacitor, allowing developers to create hybrid mobile apps with ease, while PrimeFaces focuses more on web applications. 4. **Customization**: Quasar Framework provides a high level of customization and theming options for its components, allowing developers to easily tailor the appearance of their applications, whereas PrimeFaces may have more limitations in this aspect. 5. **Performance**: Quasar Framework is known for its optimized performance, thanks to Vue.js's efficient rendering and virtual DOM system, while PrimeFaces performance may be affected by the server-side nature of JSF. 6. **Community and Support**: PrimeFaces has a large and active community of JSF developers, providing extensive support and resources, whereas Quasar Framework, being newer, may have a smaller but growing community with evolving support.

In Summary, PrimeFaces and Quasar Framework differ in their UI components, technology stack, focus on mobile development, customization options, performance, and community support levels.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

PrimeFaces
PrimeFaces
Quasar Framework
Quasar Framework

It is a popular open source framework for JavaServer Faces featuring over 100 components, touch optimized mobilekit, client side validation, theme engine and more.

Build responsive Single Page Apps, SSR Apps, PWAs, Hybrid Mobile Apps and Electron Apps, all using the same codebase!, powered with Vue.

Touch optimized; Client side validation
SPAs (Single Page App); SSR (Server-side Rendered App); PWAs (Progressive Web App); Mobile apps (Android, iOS, …); Electron; Vue.js; Full RTL support; Persian calendar; Material design 2; Complete documentation; Unit test ready
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
26.9K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
3.7K
Stacks
111
Stacks
451
Followers
190
Followers
771
Votes
4
Votes
404
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 2
    JEE Integration
  • 1
    Support Contract available
  • 1
    Nice Components
Cons
  • 1
    Some components have to be bought
  • 1
    JSF
Pros
  • 59
    Excellent documentation
  • 44
    Deploy one codebase to web, desktop, mobile, and more
  • 40
    Lots of UI components
  • 39
    Extensive collection of components
  • 33
    Being able to bundle for almost all platform is awesome
Cons
  • 4
    Stackoverflow 1.5k Questions
Integrations
JavaScript
JavaScript
Spring Boot
Spring Boot
Linux
Linux
Electron
Electron
macOS
macOS
Windows
Windows
Vue.js
Vue.js
Material Design
Material Design

What are some alternatives to PrimeFaces, Quasar Framework?

Bootstrap

Bootstrap

Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.

Foundation

Foundation

Foundation is the most advanced responsive front-end framework in the world. You can quickly prototype and build sites or apps that work on any kind of device with Foundation, which includes layout constructs (like a fully responsive grid), elements and best practices.

Semantic UI

Semantic UI

Semantic empowers designers and developers by creating a shared vocabulary for UI.

Materialize

Materialize

A CSS Framework based on material design.

Material Design for Angular

Material Design for Angular

Material Design is a specification for a unified system of visual, motion, and interaction design that adapts across different devices. Our goal is to deliver a lean, lightweight set of AngularJS-native UI elements that implement the material design system for use in Angular SPAs.

Material-UI

Material-UI

Material UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design.

Blazor

Blazor

Blazor is a .NET web framework that runs in any browser. You author Blazor apps using C#/Razor and HTML.

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js presets all the configuration needed to make your development of a Vue.js application enjoyable. You can use Nuxt.js for SSR, SPA, Static Generated, PWA and more.

UIkIt

UIkIt

UIkit gives you a comprehensive collection of HTML, CSS, and JS components which is simple to use, easy to customize and extendable.

Tailwind CSS

Tailwind CSS

Tailwind is different from frameworks like Bootstrap, Foundation, or Bulma in that it's not a UI kit. It doesn't have a default theme, and there are no build-in UI components. It comes with a menu of predesigned widgets to build your site with, but doesn't impose design decisions that are difficult to undo.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase