PRTG vs Scrutinizer

Overview

Scrutinizer

Stacks94

Followers64

Votes20

PRTG

Stacks56

Followers66

Votes0

PRTG vs Scrutinizer: What are the differences?

## Introduction

Key differences between PRTG and Scrutinizer are outlined below:

1. **Monitoring Capabilities**: PRTG offers a wider range of monitoring capabilities compared to Scrutinizer. It supports monitoring of network devices, servers, applications, and virtual environments, while Scrutinizer focuses more on network traffic analysis.

2. **Alerting and Notifications**: PRTG provides more customizable alerting and notification options, allowing users to set up alerts based on specific thresholds and conditions. Scrutinizer, on the other hand, has limited alerting capabilities compared to PRTG.

3. **Reporting Functionality**: PRTG offers more advanced reporting functionality with customizable reports and dashboards that can be easily generated and shared. Scrutinizer also provides reporting features but may lack the same level of customization and ease of use as PRTG.

4. **Integration with Third-Party Tools**: PRTG has better integration capabilities with a wide range of third-party tools and services, making it easier to incorporate into existing systems and workflows. Scrutinizer may have limited options for integration compared to PRTG.

5. **Scalability**: PRTG is known for its scalability, allowing users to monitor large networks and scale up their monitoring capabilities as needed. Scrutinizer may have limitations in terms of scalability, especially when monitoring large and complex network environments.

6. **User Interface and Ease of Use**: PRTG is praised for its user-friendly interface and ease of use, making it accessible to users with varying levels of technical expertise. Scrutinizer, while functional, may have a steeper learning curve and a less intuitive interface compared to PRTG.

In Summary, PRTG and Scrutinizer differ in monitoring capabilities, alerting and notifications, reporting functionality, integration with third-party tools, scalability, and user interface and ease of use.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Scrutinizer	PRTG
Scrutinizer is a continuous inspection platform helping you to create better software.	It can monitor and classify system conditions like bandwidth usage or uptime and collect statistics from miscellaneous hosts as switches, routers, servers and other devices and applications.
Continuously measure and track your code quality;Project quality broken down;Know your problem areas;Works fine with legacy code bases	FLEXIBLE ALERTING; MULTIPLE USER INTERFACES; CLUSTER FAILOVER SOLUTION;
Statistics
Stacks 94	Stacks 56
Followers 64	Followers 66
Votes 20	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 7 Github integration / sync 4 Bitbucket integration / sync 2 Gitlab integration / sync 2 Private Git repo sync 1 Python inspection Cons 1 Pricing	Cons 1 Running on windows 1 Graphs are static 1 Poor search capabilities
Integrations
GitHub Bitbucket	Grafana Slack

What are some alternatives to Scrutinizer, PRTG?

Code Climate

After each Git push, Code Climate analyzes your code for complexity, duplication, and common smells to determine changes in quality and surface technical debt hotspots.

Codacy

Codacy automates code reviews and monitors code quality on every commit and pull request on more than 40 programming languages reporting back the impact of every commit or PR, issues concerning code style, best practices and security.

Phabricator

Phabricator is a collection of open source web applications that help software companies build better software.

PullReview

PullReview helps Ruby and Rails developers to develop new features cleanly, on-time, and with confidence by automatically reviewing their code.

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit is a self-hosted pre-commit code review tool. It serves as a Git hosting server with option to comment incoming changes. It is highly configurable and extensible with default guarding policies, webhooks, project access control and more.

SonarQube

SonarQube provides an overview of the overall health of your source code and even more importantly, it highlights issues found on new code. With a Quality Gate set on your project, you will simply fix the Leak and start mechanically improving.

RuboCop

RuboCop is a Ruby static code analyzer. Out of the box it will enforce many of the guidelines outlined in the community Ruby Style Guide.

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io automatically and continuously tracks code quality with every GitHub or BitBucket commit and pull request, helping software developers save time in code reviews and efficiently tackle technical debt.

ESLint

A pluggable and configurable linter tool for identifying and reporting on patterns in JavaScript. Maintain your code quality with ease.

Amazon CodeGuru

It is a machine learning service for automated code reviews and application performance recommendations. It helps you find the most expensive lines of code that hurt application performance and keep you up all night troubleshooting, then gives you specific recommendations to fix or improve your code.

Related Comparisons

PRTG vs Scrutinizer: What are the differences?

## Introduction

Key differences between PRTG and Scrutinizer are outlined below:

1. **Monitoring Capabilities**: PRTG offers a wider range of monitoring capabilities compared to Scrutinizer. It supports monitoring of network devices, servers, applications, and virtual environments, while Scrutinizer focuses more on network traffic analysis.

2. **Alerting and Notifications**: PRTG provides more customizable alerting and notification options, allowing users to set up alerts based on specific thresholds and conditions. Scrutinizer, on the other hand, has limited alerting capabilities compared to PRTG.

3. **Reporting Functionality**: PRTG offers more advanced reporting functionality with customizable reports and dashboards that can be easily generated and shared. Scrutinizer also provides reporting features but may lack the same level of customization and ease of use as PRTG.

4. **Integration with Third-Party Tools**: PRTG has better integration capabilities with a wide range of third-party tools and services, making it easier to incorporate into existing systems and workflows. Scrutinizer may have limited options for integration compared to PRTG.

5. **Scalability**: PRTG is known for its scalability, allowing users to monitor large networks and scale up their monitoring capabilities as needed. Scrutinizer may have limitations in terms of scalability, especially when monitoring large and complex network environments.

6. **User Interface and Ease of Use**: PRTG is praised for its user-friendly interface and ease of use, making it accessible to users with varying levels of technical expertise. Scrutinizer, while functional, may have a steeper learning curve and a less intuitive interface compared to PRTG.

PRTG vs Scrutinizer

Overview