Puppet Bolt vs Rundeck

Overview

Rundeck

Stacks204

Followers343

Votes7

Puppet Bolt

Stacks12

Followers25

Votes9

GitHub Stars539

Forks227

Puppet Bolt vs Rundeck: What are the differences?

Introduction: In the realm of automation tools, Puppet Bolt and Rundeck are two popular platforms known for streamlining operational processes, but they have distinct features and purposes.

Implementation Approach: Puppet Bolt follows a task-oriented approach, where users can execute ad-hoc tasks across systems without requiring a Puppet infrastructure. Conversely, Rundeck focuses on job scheduling and execution, offering a centralized platform for managing complex workflows and automating routine tasks.
Target Audience: Puppet Bolt primarily caters to DevOps teams and individuals who want to perform quick and efficient automation tasks across their infrastructure. On the other hand, Rundeck is more suitable for IT operations teams looking to optimize their operational workflows and manage tasks across multiple nodes.
Integration Capabilities: Puppet Bolt seamlessly integrates with Puppet infrastructure, allowing users to leverage existing Puppet modules and manifests for automation tasks. In contrast, Rundeck offers a wide range of plugins and integrations with various systems and technologies, making it versatile for different use cases.
User Interface: Rundeck presents a user-friendly web-based interface that enables users to create and schedule jobs, view execution logs, and manage permissions easily. Puppet Bolt, being designed for ad-hoc tasks, lacks a graphical user interface and is mainly operated through the command line.
Community Support: Puppet Bolt benefits from the extensive community and support of the Puppet ecosystem, providing users with a wealth of resources, modules, and community-contributed content. Rundeck also has a strong community backing and active development, offering regular updates and plugins for extended functionality.
Scalability and Performance: While Puppet Bolt is suitable for smaller-scale automation tasks and quick fixes, Rundeck shines in managing large-scale environments with intricate workflows and scheduling requirements, making it ideal for enterprise-level automation needs.

In Summary, Puppet Bolt and Rundeck differ in their implementation approach, target audience, integration capabilities, user interface, community support, and scalability, catering to distinct automation requirements in the IT landscape.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Rundeck	Puppet Bolt
A self-service operations platform used for support tasks, enterprise job scheduling, deployment, and more.	It is an open source orchestration tool that automates the manual work it takes to maintain your infrastructure. Use it to automate tasks that you perform on an as-needed basis or as part of a greater orchestration workflow.
-	Prebuilt tasks; Automate deployments; Open source; Agent-less or agent-based; Reuse existing scripts; Ruby-support; Python-support; Bash-support; Powershell-support; Workflow orchestration
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 539
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 227
Stacks 204	Stacks 12
Followers 343	Followers 25
Votes 7	Votes 9
Pros & Cons
Pros 3 Role based access control 3 Easy to understand 1 Doesn't need containers	Pros 3 Simple 2 Agentless 2 Powerful 2 Easy to Install
Integrations
Ansible Jenkins	Python Linux PowerShell Windows macOS

What are some alternatives to Rundeck, Puppet Bolt?

Ansible

Ansible is an IT automation tool. It can configure systems, deploy software, and orchestrate more advanced IT tasks such as continuous deployments or zero downtime rolling updates. Ansible’s goals are foremost those of simplicity and maximum ease of use.

Chef

Chef enables you to manage and scale cloud infrastructure with no downtime or interruptions. Freely move applications and configurations from one cloud to another. Chef is integrated with all major cloud providers including Amazon EC2, VMWare, IBM Smartcloud, Rackspace, OpenStack, Windows Azure, HP Cloud, Google Compute Engine, Joyent Cloud and others.

Terraform

With Terraform, you describe your complete infrastructure as code, even as it spans multiple service providers. Your servers may come from AWS, your DNS may come from CloudFlare, and your database may come from Heroku. Terraform will build all these resources across all these providers in parallel.

Capistrano

Capistrano is a remote server automation tool. It supports the scripting and execution of arbitrary tasks, and includes a set of sane-default deployment workflows.

Puppet Labs

Puppet is an automated administrative engine for your Linux, Unix, and Windows systems and performs administrative tasks (such as adding users, installing packages, and updating server configurations) based on a centralized specification.

Salt

Salt is a new approach to infrastructure management. Easy enough to get running in minutes, scalable enough to manage tens of thousands of servers, and fast enough to communicate with them in seconds. Salt delivers a dynamic communication bus for infrastructures that can be used for orchestration, remote execution, configuration management and much more.

Fabric

Fabric is a Python (2.5-2.7) library and command-line tool for streamlining the use of SSH for application deployment or systems administration tasks. It provides a basic suite of operations for executing local or remote shell commands (normally or via sudo) and uploading/downloading files, as well as auxiliary functionality such as prompting the running user for input, or aborting execution.

AWS OpsWorks

Start from templates for common technologies like Ruby, Node.JS, PHP, and Java, or build your own using Chef recipes to install software packages and perform any task that you can script. AWS OpsWorks can scale your application using automatic load-based or time-based scaling and maintain the health of your application by detecting failed instances and replacing them. You have full control of deployments and automation of each component

cPanel

It is an industry leading hosting platform with world-class support. It is globally empowering hosting providers through fully-automated point-and-click hosting platform by hosting-centric professionals

Webmin

It is a web-based interface for system administration for Unix. Using any modern web browser, you can setup user accounts, Apache, DNS, file sharing and much more. It removes the need to manually edit Unix configuration files.

Related Comparisons

Puppet Bolt vs Rundeck: What are the differences?

Introduction: In the realm of automation tools, Puppet Bolt and Rundeck are two popular platforms known for streamlining operational processes, but they have distinct features and purposes.

Implementation Approach: Puppet Bolt follows a task-oriented approach, where users can execute ad-hoc tasks across systems without requiring a Puppet infrastructure. Conversely, Rundeck focuses on job scheduling and execution, offering a centralized platform for managing complex workflows and automating routine tasks.
Target Audience: Puppet Bolt primarily caters to DevOps teams and individuals who want to perform quick and efficient automation tasks across their infrastructure. On the other hand, Rundeck is more suitable for IT operations teams looking to optimize their operational workflows and manage tasks across multiple nodes.
Integration Capabilities: Puppet Bolt seamlessly integrates with Puppet infrastructure, allowing users to leverage existing Puppet modules and manifests for automation tasks. In contrast, Rundeck offers a wide range of plugins and integrations with various systems and technologies, making it versatile for different use cases.
User Interface: Rundeck presents a user-friendly web-based interface that enables users to create and schedule jobs, view execution logs, and manage permissions easily. Puppet Bolt, being designed for ad-hoc tasks, lacks a graphical user interface and is mainly operated through the command line.
Community Support: Puppet Bolt benefits from the extensive community and support of the Puppet ecosystem, providing users with a wealth of resources, modules, and community-contributed content. Rundeck also has a strong community backing and active development, offering regular updates and plugins for extended functionality.
Scalability and Performance: While Puppet Bolt is suitable for smaller-scale automation tasks and quick fixes, Rundeck shines in managing large-scale environments with intricate workflows and scheduling requirements, making it ideal for enterprise-level automation needs.

Puppet Bolt vs Rundeck

Overview