StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Code Review
  4. Code Review
  5. Pylint vs textlint

Pylint vs textlint

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Pylint
Pylint
Stacks873
Followers97
Votes17
textlint
textlint
Stacks24
Followers3
Votes0
GitHub Stars3.0K
Forks153

Pylint vs textlint: What are the differences?

Introduction

Pylint and textlint are popular code analysis tools used for identifying and highlighting code issues in programming languages. Although they serve the same purpose, there are key differences between the two tools.

  1. Extensibility and Language Support: Pylint is primarily designed for analyzing Python code, while textlint is focused on analyzing text and Markdown files. Pylint supports a wide range of Python libraries and frameworks, making it suitable for Python projects of all sizes. On the other hand, textlint supports multiple languages and can be extended with plugins to cater to specific requirements.

  2. Rule Set and Customization: Pylint comes with a predefined set of rules that cover various aspects of code quality and style. These rules can be customized by disabling or enabling specific rules as per the project's needs. Textlint, on the other hand, allows users to build custom rule sets using regular expressions and plugins. This provides greater flexibility for enforcing specific writing or formatting styles.

  3. Integration with Development Environment: Pylint integrates well with popular Python IDEs such as PyCharm, Visual Studio Code, and Sublime Text. It provides on-the-fly code analysis and error highlighting within the editor itself. Textlint, on the other hand, can be integrated with text editors via plugins but does not have the same level of IDE integration as Pylint.

  4. Focus on Code Quality vs. Writing Quality: Pylint primarily focuses on analyzing code quality, including aspects like naming conventions, code complexity, duplicated code, etc. It helps improve the overall maintainability and readability of the codebase. Textlint, on the other hand, focuses on analyzing writing quality, including grammar mistakes, style inconsistencies, word choice, etc. It is more suited for content creators, technical writers, and documentation authors.

  5. Ease of Configuration and Usage: Pylint offers multiple configuration options through a configuration file, command-line arguments, or inline comments. This allows users to fine-tune the linting behavior according to their project's requirements. Textlint also provides similar configuration options, but the setup process might require more effort due to its flexibility and the need for custom rules.

  6. Community and Ecosystem: Pylint has been widely adopted in the Python community and has a large user base. This means there are numerous resources, tutorials, and community support available for users. On the other hand, textlint has gained popularity in the JavaScript and Markdown community, and it has a growing ecosystem with a dedicated plugin repository and community involvement.

In summary, Pylint is focused on analyzing Python code quality with extensive language support and IDE integration, while textlint specializes in analyzing writing quality in text and Markdown files with a flexible rule set and customizability options.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Pylint
Pylint
textlint
textlint

It is a Python static code analysis tool which looks for programming errors, helps enforcing a coding standard, sniffs for code smells and offers simple refactoring suggestions.

It is an open source text linting utility written in JavaScript. It is hard to lint natural language texts, but we try to resolve this issue by pluggable approach.

Syntax Check;Style Check;Warnings
No bundled rules; Markdown and plain text are supported by default. Support is available for HTML and other file formats via plugins; Supports the use of custom formatters and formatter bundles formatter(reporter)
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
3.0K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
153
Stacks
873
Stacks
24
Followers
97
Followers
3
Votes
17
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 3
    Command Line
  • 2
    Spell Check strings & comments
  • 2
    Code score & directions
  • 2
    Pre-commit checks
  • 2
    IDE Integration
No community feedback yet
Integrations
FreeBSD
FreeBSD
Debian
Debian
Vim
Vim
Windows
Windows
Mac OS X
Mac OS X
TextMate
TextMate
Visual Studio
Visual Studio
Komodo IDE
Komodo IDE
Eclipse
Eclipse
Visual Studio Code
Visual Studio Code
Visual Studio Code
Visual Studio Code
Sublime Text
Sublime Text
Atom
Atom
Vim
Vim
NetBeans IDE
NetBeans IDE
Google Chrome
Google Chrome
Micro
Micro

What are some alternatives to Pylint, textlint?

Code Climate

Code Climate

After each Git push, Code Climate analyzes your code for complexity, duplication, and common smells to determine changes in quality and surface technical debt hotspots.

Codacy

Codacy

Codacy automates code reviews and monitors code quality on every commit and pull request on more than 40 programming languages reporting back the impact of every commit or PR, issues concerning code style, best practices and security.

Phabricator

Phabricator

Phabricator is a collection of open source web applications that help software companies build better software.

PullReview

PullReview

PullReview helps Ruby and Rails developers to develop new features cleanly, on-time, and with confidence by automatically reviewing their code.

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit is a self-hosted pre-commit code review tool. It serves as a Git hosting server with option to comment incoming changes. It is highly configurable and extensible with default guarding policies, webhooks, project access control and more.

SonarQube

SonarQube

SonarQube provides an overview of the overall health of your source code and even more importantly, it highlights issues found on new code. With a Quality Gate set on your project, you will simply fix the Leak and start mechanically improving.

RuboCop

RuboCop

RuboCop is a Ruby static code analyzer. Out of the box it will enforce many of the guidelines outlined in the community Ruby Style Guide.

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io automatically and continuously tracks code quality with every GitHub or BitBucket commit and pull request, helping software developers save time in code reviews and efficiently tackle technical debt.

ESLint

ESLint

A pluggable and configurable linter tool for identifying and reporting on patterns in JavaScript. Maintain your code quality with ease.

Amazon CodeGuru

Amazon CodeGuru

It is a machine learning service for automated code reviews and application performance recommendations. It helps you find the most expensive lines of code that hurt application performance and keep you up all night troubleshooting, then gives you specific recommendations to fix or improve your code.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana