StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Performance Monitoring
  4. Front End Performance Monitoring
  5. Qbaka vs SpeedCurve

Qbaka vs SpeedCurve

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

SpeedCurve
SpeedCurve
Stacks26
Followers27
Votes3
Qbaka
Qbaka
Stacks2
Followers7
Votes0

Qbaka vs SpeedCurve: What are the differences?

What is Qbaka? Smart frontend error monitoring and analytics, JavaScript error tracking. Qbaka automatically collects errors without user interation. Whenever error happen, it is collected by Qbaka and developers get maximum helpful data to fix the problem.

What is SpeedCurve? Front-end performance monitoring. It's WebPageTest on steroids!. SpeedCurve gives you continuous feedback on how your front-end code is affecting the performance of your website. Get detailed build analysis and performance filmstrips for your own website and then benchmark your performance against the competition to make sure your website loads faster.

Qbaka and SpeedCurve can be categorized as "Font-end Performance Monitoring" tools.

Some of the features offered by Qbaka are:

  • Smart error grouping
  • Stacktraces extraction
  • Raw data: user IP, timezone, url, browser, etc

On the other hand, SpeedCurve provides the following key features:

  • Front-end performance monitoring
  • Track asset sizes and requests
  • Built in Google PagesSpeed Insight reports

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

SpeedCurve
SpeedCurve
Qbaka
Qbaka

SpeedCurve gives you continuous feedback on how your front-end code is affecting the performance of your website. Get detailed build analysis and performance filmstrips for your own website and then benchmark your performance against the competition to make sure your website loads faster.

Qbaka automatically collects errors without user interation. Whenever error happen, it is collected by Qbaka and developers get maximum helpful data to fix the problem.

Front-end performance monitoring;Track asset sizes and requests;Built in Google PagesSpeed Insight reports;Weekly reports and alerts;Built on top of WebPagetest;Responsive website testing;Competitive benchmarking;Share dashboards with the team;API to trigger tests on every deploy;Visual diffs to spot UX regressions
Smart error grouping;Stacktraces extraction;Raw data: user IP, timezone, url, browser, etc;Custom muting by script/error message;SSL support;Global error statistics
Statistics
Stacks
26
Stacks
2
Followers
27
Followers
7
Votes
3
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 2
    Easy setup
  • 1
    Understandable reports and great benchmark
No community feedback yet
Integrations
Slack
Slack
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to SpeedCurve, Qbaka?

Atatus

Atatus

Atatus is a server and frontend monitoring SaaS, using which you can monitor the performance and track the errors of your app.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana