StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Cross Platform Mobile Development
  5. Qt vs Sciter

Qt vs Sciter

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Qt
Qt
Stacks464
Followers637
Votes138
Sciter
Sciter
Stacks6
Followers31
Votes20

Qt vs Sciter: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this Markdown code, we will present the key differences between Qt and Sciter. Both Qt and Sciter are popular frameworks used for developing cross-platform applications.

  1. 1. Programming Language Support: Qt primarily uses C++ for application development and offers extensive support for other programming languages such as Python, JavaScript, and more. On the other hand, Sciter uses mainly HTML and CSS for application development, with support for scripting through its proprietary language called TIScript.

  2. 2. User Interface Design: Qt provides a rich set of UI components and widgets that can be customized and styled to create visually appealing interfaces. It also offers the Qt Quick module, which allows developers to create fluid and dynamic user interfaces using QML (Qt Meta Language). In contrast, Sciter leverages the power of HTML and CSS for UI design, providing developers with familiar tools and techniques to create modern and responsive interfaces.

  3. 3. Platform Support: Qt is known for its extensive cross-platform capabilities, allowing developers to build applications for various operating systems such as Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and iOS. It provides native look and feel on each platform and ensures consistent behavior across different devices. On the other hand, Sciter primarily focuses on desktop application development and has better support for Windows, with limited compatibility on other platforms.

  4. 4. Performance and Footprint: Qt is generally considered to have good performance and a smaller memory footprint compared to other frameworks. It utilizes efficient rendering and event handling mechanisms, enabling fast and responsive applications. Sciter, although optimized for performance, tends to have a slightly higher memory footprint due to its HTML and CSS rendering engine.

  5. 5. Licensing Model: Qt offers both commercial and open-source licenses, providing flexibility for developers based on their requirements. The open-source version, called Qt Community Edition, is available under LGPL v3 license. Sciter, on the other hand, follows a dual-licensing model where it offers a free version for non-commercial use and a commercial license for commercial applications.

  6. 6. Development Tools and IDE: Qt provides a comprehensive set of development tools, including the Qt Creator IDE, which offers a graphical UI designer, code editor, and integrated debugging capabilities. It also integrates with other popular IDEs such as Visual Studio and Eclipse. Sciter, on the other hand, is more lightweight in terms of development tools and IDE support. It can be used with any text editor and doesn't require a dedicated IDE.

In summary, Qt and Sciter differ in terms of programming language support, user interface design, platform support, performance and footprint, licensing model, and development tools. Qt offers a wide range of language support, extensive UI customization options, cross-platform capabilities, good performance, flexible licensing, and advanced development tools. Sciter, on the other hand, focuses on HTML and CSS-based UI design, has better support for Windows, optimized performance, dual licensing, and a more lightweight development approach.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Qt
Qt
Sciter
Sciter

Qt, a leading cross-platform application and UI framework. With Qt, you can develop applications once and deploy to leading desktop, embedded & mobile targets.

It brings a stack of web technologies to desktop UI development. Web designers, and developers, can reuse their experience and expertise in creating modern looking desktop applications.

-
Cross platform; Embeddable; Flexible; Small footprint
Statistics
Stacks
464
Stacks
6
Followers
637
Followers
31
Votes
138
Votes
20
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 17
    High Performance
  • 13
    Declarative, easy and flexible UI
  • 12
    Performance
  • 12
    Cross platform
  • 9
    Fast prototyping
Cons
  • 5
    Paid
  • 4
    C++ is not so productive
  • 2
    Lack of community support
  • 1
    Lack of libraries
  • 1
    Not detailed documentation
Pros
  • 4
    Cross platform apps
  • 4
    Small bundle size
  • 4
    Good for commercial projects
  • 4
    Use C++ API
  • 4
    Faster than ElectronJS
Cons
  • 2
    Ultralight si lo es,aunque hay módulos comerciales
  • 1
    Doesn't support Javascript
  • 1
    Close source project
  • 1
    Less/bad documentation
  • 1
    No es open source
Integrations
No integrations available
Sentry
Sentry
Electron
Electron
Photon
Photon
Jolteon
Jolteon
DoneJS
DoneJS
Hazel
Hazel
Nightmare.js
Nightmare.js

What are some alternatives to Qt, Sciter?

Ionic

Ionic

Free and open source, Ionic offers a library of mobile and desktop-optimized HTML, CSS and JS components for building highly interactive apps. Use with Angular, React, Vue, or plain JavaScript.

Flutter

Flutter

Flutter is a mobile app SDK to help developers and designers build modern mobile apps for iOS and Android.

React Native

React Native

React Native enables you to build world-class application experiences on native platforms using a consistent developer experience based on JavaScript and React. The focus of React Native is on developer efficiency across all the platforms you care about - learn once, write anywhere. Facebook uses React Native in multiple production apps and will continue investing in React Native.

Xamarin

Xamarin

Xamarin’s Mono-based products enable .NET developers to use their existing code, libraries and tools (including Visual Studio*), as well as skills in .NET and the C# programming language, to create mobile applications for the industry’s most widely-used mobile devices, including Android-based smartphones and tablets, iPhone, iPad and iPod Touch.

NativeScript

NativeScript

NativeScript enables developers to build native apps for iOS, Android and Windows Universal while sharing the application code across the platforms. When building the application UI, developers use our libraries, which abstract the differences between the native platforms.

Apache Cordova

Apache Cordova

Apache Cordova is a set of device APIs that allow a mobile app developer to access native device function such as the camera or accelerometer from JavaScript. Combined with a UI framework such as jQuery Mobile or Dojo Mobile or Sencha Touch, this allows a smartphone app to be developed with just HTML, CSS, and JavaScript.

Framework7

Framework7

It is a free and open source mobile HTML framework to develop hybrid mobile apps or web apps with iOS native look and feel. All you need to make it work is a simple HTML layout and attached framework's CSS and JS files.

Electron

Electron

With Electron, creating a desktop application for your company or idea is easy. Initially developed for GitHub's Atom editor, Electron has since been used to create applications by companies like Microsoft, Facebook, Slack, and Docker. The Electron framework lets you write cross-platform desktop applications using JavaScript, HTML and CSS. It is based on io.js and Chromium and is used in the Atom editor.

PhoneGap

PhoneGap

PhoneGap is a web platform that exposes native mobile device apis and data to JavaScript. PhoneGap is a distribution of Apache Cordova. PhoneGap allows you to use standard web technologies such as HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript for cross-platform development, avoiding each mobile platforms' native development language. Applications execute within wrappers targeted to each platform, and rely on standards-compliant API bindings to access each device's sensors, data, and network status.

Expo

Expo

It is a framework and a platform for universal React applications. It is a set of tools and services built around React Native and native platforms that help you develop, build, deploy, and quickly iterate on iOS, Android, and web apps.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase