Quasar Framework vs Skeleton

Overview

Skeleton

Stacks54

Followers100

Votes24

GitHub Stars19.7K

Forks3.1K

Quasar Framework

Stacks451

Followers771

Votes404

GitHub Stars26.9K

Forks3.7K

Quasar Framework vs Skeleton: What are the differences?

Architecture: Quasar Framework is a full-featured Vue.js framework that provides a higher-level API for building Vue.js applications with a focus on performance and developer experience. On the other hand, Skeleton is a lightweight CSS framework that provides the basic styling for a responsive website layout.
Component Library: Quasar Framework comes with a comprehensive set of pre-built Vue.js components, which makes it easier to create complex UIs and applications quickly. In contrast, Skeleton does not provide any pre-built components and focuses solely on providing a basic styling foundation.
Customization: Quasar Framework allows for extensive customization through themes, style directives, and plugins, giving developers more control over the appearance and behavior of their applications. However, Skeleton offers minimal customization options as it is designed to be a simple and lightweight CSS framework.
Community Support: Quasar Framework has a large and active community that provides support, documentation, and plugins, making it easier for developers to find resources and solutions to their problems. On the other hand, Skeleton has a smaller community and may have limited resources available for support and expansion.
Complexity: Quasar Framework is more suitable for building larger and complex applications due to its feature-rich nature and extensive functionality. In contrast, Skeleton is better suited for smaller projects or as a starting point for custom CSS development due to its minimalist approach.
Ease of Use: Quasar Framework provides a more structured and opinionated development experience, which can be advantageous for beginners or teams looking for a consistent approach to building Vue.js applications. Skeleton, being a lightweight CSS framework, offers a more flexible and bare-bones approach, which may appeal to developers looking for more freedom in their design choices.

In Summary, Quasar Framework offers a feature-rich Vue.js framework with a comprehensive component library and extensive customization options, making it suitable for larger and complex applications, while Skeleton is a lightweight CSS framework with basic styling capabilities, ideal for smaller projects or as a foundation for custom CSS development.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Skeleton	Quasar Framework
Skeleton is a small collection of CSS files that can help you rapidly develop sites that look beautiful at any size, be it a 17" laptop screen or an iPhone.	Build responsive Single Page Apps, SSR Apps, PWAs, Hybrid Mobile Apps and Electron Apps, all using the same codebase!, powered with Vue.
Responsive Grid Down To Mobile;Fast to Start;Style Agnostic;	SPAs (Single Page App); SSR (Server-side Rendered App); PWAs (Progressive Web App); Mobile apps (Android, iOS, …); Electron; Vue.js; Full RTL support; Persian calendar; Material design 2; Complete documentation; Unit test ready
Statistics
GitHub Stars 19.7K	GitHub Stars 26.9K
GitHub Forks 3.1K	GitHub Forks 3.7K
Stacks 54	Stacks 451
Followers 100	Followers 771
Votes 24	Votes 404
Pros & Cons
Pros 9 Minimalist 6 Responsive 4 Simple 2 Fantastically straight forward 1 Lightweight Cons 0 Have to make design decisions	Pros 59 Excellent documentation 44 Deploy one codebase to web, desktop, mobile, and more 40 Lots of UI components 39 Extensive collection of components 33 Being able to bundle for almost all platform is awesome Cons 4 Stackoverflow 1.5k Questions
Integrations
No integrations available	Linux Electron macOS Windows Vue.js Material Design

What are some alternatives to Skeleton, Quasar Framework?

Bootstrap

Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.

Foundation

Foundation is the most advanced responsive front-end framework in the world. You can quickly prototype and build sites or apps that work on any kind of device with Foundation, which includes layout constructs (like a fully responsive grid), elements and best practices.

Semantic UI

Semantic empowers designers and developers by creating a shared vocabulary for UI.

Materialize

A CSS Framework based on material design.

Material Design for Angular

Material Design is a specification for a unified system of visual, motion, and interaction design that adapts across different devices. Our goal is to deliver a lean, lightweight set of AngularJS-native UI elements that implement the material design system for use in Angular SPAs.

Material-UI

Material UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design.

Blazor

Blazor is a .NET web framework that runs in any browser. You author Blazor apps using C#/Razor and HTML.

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js presets all the configuration needed to make your development of a Vue.js application enjoyable. You can use Nuxt.js for SSR, SPA, Static Generated, PWA and more.

UIkIt

UIkit gives you a comprehensive collection of HTML, CSS, and JS components which is simple to use, easy to customize and extendable.

Tailwind CSS

Tailwind is different from frameworks like Bootstrap, Foundation, or Bulma in that it's not a UI kit. It doesn't have a default theme, and there are no build-in UI components. It comes with a menu of predesigned widgets to build your site with, but doesn't impose design decisions that are difficult to undo.

Related Comparisons

Quasar Framework vs Skeleton: What are the differences?

Architecture: Quasar Framework is a full-featured Vue.js framework that provides a higher-level API for building Vue.js applications with a focus on performance and developer experience. On the other hand, Skeleton is a lightweight CSS framework that provides the basic styling for a responsive website layout.
Component Library: Quasar Framework comes with a comprehensive set of pre-built Vue.js components, which makes it easier to create complex UIs and applications quickly. In contrast, Skeleton does not provide any pre-built components and focuses solely on providing a basic styling foundation.
Customization: Quasar Framework allows for extensive customization through themes, style directives, and plugins, giving developers more control over the appearance and behavior of their applications. However, Skeleton offers minimal customization options as it is designed to be a simple and lightweight CSS framework.
Community Support: Quasar Framework has a large and active community that provides support, documentation, and plugins, making it easier for developers to find resources and solutions to their problems. On the other hand, Skeleton has a smaller community and may have limited resources available for support and expansion.
Complexity: Quasar Framework is more suitable for building larger and complex applications due to its feature-rich nature and extensive functionality. In contrast, Skeleton is better suited for smaller projects or as a starting point for custom CSS development due to its minimalist approach.
Ease of Use: Quasar Framework provides a more structured and opinionated development experience, which can be advantageous for beginners or teams looking for a consistent approach to building Vue.js applications. Skeleton, being a lightweight CSS framework, offers a more flexible and bare-bones approach, which may appeal to developers looking for more freedom in their design choices.

Quasar Framework vs Skeleton

Overview