Quasar Framework vs Water.css

Overview

Water.css

Stacks6

Followers24

Votes0

GitHub Stars8.6K

Forks502

Quasar Framework

Stacks451

Followers771

Votes404

GitHub Stars26.9K

Forks3.7K

Quasar Framework vs Water.css: What are the differences?

Component Library: Quasar Framework is a comprehensive Vue.js framework that provides a vast library of pre-built components and plugins, making it easier to develop web applications. In contrast, Water.css is a lightweight CSS framework that focuses on providing a minimalistic styling approach without any JavaScript functionalities.
Theme Customization: Quasar Framework allows extensive theming and customization options through variables and themes, enabling developers to create unique designs for their applications. On the other hand, Water.css does not offer any theming capabilities and is designed to maintain a consistent, simple aesthetic across all projects.
JavaScript Functionality: Quasar Framework includes a wide range of built-in JavaScript features, such as Vuex store, Vue Router, and SSR support, enhancing the functionality and performance of web applications. In contrast, Water.css solely focuses on styling elements and does not include any JavaScript functionalities.
File Size: Quasar Framework has a larger file size due to its extensive component library, JavaScript features, and theming capabilities, which may impact the loading time of web applications. Conversely, Water.css has a minimal file size, making it lightweight and suitable for projects where performance is a crucial factor.
Community Support: Quasar Framework has a large and active community of developers, providing extensive documentation, tutorials, and support forums for users to seek help and guidance while working on their projects. Water.css, being a smaller project, may have limited community support and resources available for developers.
Project Complexity: Quasar Framework is suitable for complex, feature-rich web applications that require a wide range of components, functionality, and customization options. In contrast, Water.css is more suitable for simple, static websites or projects that do not require extensive styling or JavaScript functionalities.

In Summary, Quasar Framework and Water.css differ in component library, theme customization, JavaScript functionality, file size, community support, and project complexity.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Water.css	Quasar Framework
A css framework that doesn't require any classes. You just include it in your <head> and forget about it, while it silently makes everything nicer.	Build responsive Single Page Apps, SSR Apps, PWAs, Hybrid Mobile Apps and Electron Apps, all using the same codebase!, powered with Vue.
Responsive; Modern browser support; Small size (< 2kb); Beautiful; No classes;	SPAs (Single Page App); SSR (Server-side Rendered App); PWAs (Progressive Web App); Mobile apps (Android, iOS, …); Electron; Vue.js; Full RTL support; Persian calendar; Material design 2; Complete documentation; Unit test ready
Statistics
GitHub Stars 8.6K	GitHub Stars 26.9K
GitHub Forks 502	GitHub Forks 3.7K
Stacks 6	Stacks 451
Followers 24	Followers 771
Votes 0	Votes 404
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet	Pros 59 Excellent documentation 44 Deploy one codebase to web, desktop, mobile, and more 40 Lots of UI components 39 Extensive collection of components 33 Being able to bundle for almost all platform is awesome Cons 4 Stackoverflow 1.5k Questions
Integrations
jsDelivr Replit	Linux Electron macOS Windows Vue.js Material Design

What are some alternatives to Water.css, Quasar Framework?

Bootstrap

Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.

Foundation

Foundation is the most advanced responsive front-end framework in the world. You can quickly prototype and build sites or apps that work on any kind of device with Foundation, which includes layout constructs (like a fully responsive grid), elements and best practices.

Semantic UI

Semantic empowers designers and developers by creating a shared vocabulary for UI.

Materialize

A CSS Framework based on material design.

Material Design for Angular

Material Design is a specification for a unified system of visual, motion, and interaction design that adapts across different devices. Our goal is to deliver a lean, lightweight set of AngularJS-native UI elements that implement the material design system for use in Angular SPAs.

Material-UI

Material UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design.

Blazor

Blazor is a .NET web framework that runs in any browser. You author Blazor apps using C#/Razor and HTML.

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js presets all the configuration needed to make your development of a Vue.js application enjoyable. You can use Nuxt.js for SSR, SPA, Static Generated, PWA and more.

UIkIt

UIkit gives you a comprehensive collection of HTML, CSS, and JS components which is simple to use, easy to customize and extendable.

Tailwind CSS

Tailwind is different from frameworks like Bootstrap, Foundation, or Bulma in that it's not a UI kit. It doesn't have a default theme, and there are no build-in UI components. It comes with a menu of predesigned widgets to build your site with, but doesn't impose design decisions that are difficult to undo.

Related Comparisons

Quasar Framework vs Water.css: What are the differences?

Component Library: Quasar Framework is a comprehensive Vue.js framework that provides a vast library of pre-built components and plugins, making it easier to develop web applications. In contrast, Water.css is a lightweight CSS framework that focuses on providing a minimalistic styling approach without any JavaScript functionalities.
Theme Customization: Quasar Framework allows extensive theming and customization options through variables and themes, enabling developers to create unique designs for their applications. On the other hand, Water.css does not offer any theming capabilities and is designed to maintain a consistent, simple aesthetic across all projects.
JavaScript Functionality: Quasar Framework includes a wide range of built-in JavaScript features, such as Vuex store, Vue Router, and SSR support, enhancing the functionality and performance of web applications. In contrast, Water.css solely focuses on styling elements and does not include any JavaScript functionalities.
File Size: Quasar Framework has a larger file size due to its extensive component library, JavaScript features, and theming capabilities, which may impact the loading time of web applications. Conversely, Water.css has a minimal file size, making it lightweight and suitable for projects where performance is a crucial factor.
Community Support: Quasar Framework has a large and active community of developers, providing extensive documentation, tutorials, and support forums for users to seek help and guidance while working on their projects. Water.css, being a smaller project, may have limited community support and resources available for developers.
Project Complexity: Quasar Framework is suitable for complex, feature-rich web applications that require a wide range of components, functionality, and customization options. In contrast, Water.css is more suitable for simple, static websites or projects that do not require extensive styling or JavaScript functionalities.

In Summary, Quasar Framework and Water.css differ in component library, theme customization, JavaScript functionality, file size, community support, and project complexity.

Quasar Framework vs Water.css

Overview