StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. Messaging
  4. Communications SDK
  5. QuickBlox vs Telegram API

QuickBlox vs Telegram API

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

QuickBlox
QuickBlox
Stacks29
Followers107
Votes7
Telegram API
Telegram API
Stacks157
Followers152
Votes9

QuickBlox vs Telegram API: What are the differences?

  1. Authentication Methodology: QuickBlox requires users to register an account and obtain an application ID and authorization key to use its services, whereas Telegram API uses phone numbers as the primary method of authentication, linking each user account to a unique phone number.
  2. Messaging Features: QuickBlox offers a wide range of messaging features including group chat, file sharing, and push notifications, while Telegram API boasts end-to-end encryption, self-destructing messages, and extensive multimedia support like stickers and GIFs.
  3. Data Storage Options: QuickBlox provides cloud storage options for data management, whereas Telegram API focuses on user privacy by not storing data on their servers, offering only limited cloud storage for media files.
  4. Development Resources: QuickBlox offers comprehensive documentation, SDKs, and support resources for developers to easily integrate its services into applications, whereas Telegram API provides a lightweight, easy-to-use API with minimal developer resources required.
  5. Pricing Model: QuickBlox follows a subscription-based pricing model with various plans and pricing tiers depending on usage and features, while Telegram API is completely free to use and does not charge for any of its services or features.
  6. User Base and Availability: QuickBlox is widely used by businesses and enterprises for enterprise communications and customer engagement, while Telegram API is popular among individuals and smaller organizations for secure messaging and community building.

In Summary, QuickBlox and Telegram API differ in authentication methodology, messaging features, data storage options, development resources, pricing model, and user base preferences.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

QuickBlox
QuickBlox
Telegram API
Telegram API

Add powerful communication features to your mobile app and data services for your backend<br>

This API allows you to build your own customized Telegram clients. It is 100% open for all developers who wish to create Telegram applications on our platform.

Chat/IM;User login/registration, SSO;Video Calling;Push Notifications;Voice/VOIP Calling;Content &amp; Files;Location;Ratings;Custom objects
-
Statistics
Stacks
29
Stacks
157
Followers
107
Followers
152
Votes
7
Votes
9
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 7
    Flexibility
Pros
  • 7
    Open Source
  • 1
    Clean
  • 1
    Fluent

What are some alternatives to QuickBlox, Telegram API?

Chat by Stream

Chat by Stream

Chat API and SDK. With a beautiful UI Kit, easy to use React Components and powerful API. Add Chat to any application in a matter of hours. The tech uses Go, RocksDB and Raft. By the creators of Stream, the API that powers activity feeds for more than 300 million users.

SendBird

SendBird

SendBird is a Messaging SDK, Chat API, and fully managed chat infrastructure for your mobile apps and websites. Embeddable chat for iOS, Android, JavaScript, Unity, .NET.

Sinch

Sinch

Sinch makes it easy for developers to add voice, messaging and SMS to their apps with just a few lines of code. Enrich your apps with communications that your users will love.

TapTalk.io

TapTalk.io

TapTalk.io is a complete in-app chat SDK and messaging API. It designed to be easy to implement and give your user the best in-app chat experience. We provide you customizable UI based implementation and code based implementation.

ChannelizeIO

ChannelizeIO

Add In-App User-to-User Communication into Mobile Apps & Websites, with rich & engaging Text Chat, Video, and Audio Calling experiences, to Increase User Engagement and Enable new Revenue Streams.

Agora

Agora

Agora.io provides building blocks for you to add real-time voice and video communications through a simple and powerful SDK. You can integrate the Agora SDK to enable real-time communications in your own application quickly.

OpenTok

OpenTok

It adds the clarity and emotion of face-to-face communication to your brand whether you're developing for the web, iOS, or Android. We make the integration of high-quality live video a breeze so that you can focus on building a great product.

Layer

Layer

Layer's asynchronous messaging fabric is capable of transporting payloads of any type. Get your users talking with chat, voice or video messaging. Pull them back in with push. Connect friends, colleagues or perfect strangers seamlessly.

Scringo

Scringo

Scringo offers a unique Community &amp; Messaging Platform that turns every app into an independent, dynamic &amp; fully functional social network.

TalkJS

TalkJS

TalkJS provides a chat API & Javascript SDK with a pre-built UI that allows developers to add chat between users on websites and apps in hours instead of months.

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope