Ramda vs Underscore: What are the differences?
## Introduction
This Markdown code presents the key differences between Ramda and Underscore, two popular JavaScript libraries commonly used in functional programming.
1. **Functional Programming Paradigm**: Ramda is designed purely for functional programming, emphasizing immutability and side-effect-free functions, while Underscore offers a mix of functional programming utilities along with object-oriented programming support.
2. **Automatic Data-last Method Signatures**: Ramda follows the functional programming convention of keeping the data parameter last in its method signatures, whereas Underscore adheres to traditional JavaScript conventions with data as the first parameter.
3. **Automatic Currying of Functions**: Ramda functions are automatically curried by default, allowing for easier partial application, while Underscore functions are not natively curried, requiring explicit calls to curry functions.
4. **Chaining vs Composition**: Underscore provides chaining methods for easier method sequencing, while Ramda emphasizes function composition as a primary approach for creating complex functions by combining simpler ones.
5. **Separate Utility Functions vs Methods on the Prototype**: Underscore adds utility functions directly to the `\_` global object, requiring them to be invoked with `_.`, while Ramda requires importing functions individually or as a whole for use, ensuring a cleaner namespace.
6. **Dynamic vs Static Typing**: Ramda is designed with type signatures for its functions, making it more suitable for statically typed languages and enhancing development with strong type support, whereas Underscore lacks this feature and is more dynamic in nature.
In Summary, the key differences between Ramda and Underscore lie in their functional programming paradigms, method signatures, currying, function composition, utility function accessibility, and type system integration.
