StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Business Tools
  3. UI Components
  4. Javascript UI Libraries
  5. React vs SwiftUI

React vs SwiftUI

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

React
React
Stacks182.6K
Followers147.0K
Votes4.1K
GitHub Stars240.3K
Forks49.7K
SwiftUI
SwiftUI
Stacks590
Followers567
Votes6

React vs SwiftUI: What are the differences?

Introduction React and SwiftUI are both popular frameworks used for building user interfaces in web and mobile applications respectively. While they serve similar purposes, there are some key differences between them that make each unique.

  1. Language and Platform: React is a JavaScript library developed by Facebook and primarily used for building web applications. It is based on JavaScript and uses a virtual DOM for efficient rendering. On the other hand, SwiftUI is a user interface toolkit developed by Apple for building applications on iOS, macOS, watchOS, and tvOS. It uses Swift as the programming language and provides a declarative approach to building user interfaces.

  2. Component Model: React follows a component-based architecture, where the user interface is divided into small reusable components. These components can be written in JavaScript or even JSX (a syntax extension for JavaScript). The components can have their own state and can be composed together to build complex interfaces. SwiftUI, on the other hand, also follows a similar component-based architecture but uses views instead of components. Views in SwiftUI are lightweight structures that are automatically updated whenever the underlying data changes.

  3. React Native vs. Native: React Native is a framework based on React that allows developers to build mobile applications for iOS and Android using JavaScript. It uses native components, which means that the resulting application is not a web app running inside a WebView, but a real mobile app. On the other hand, SwiftUI is a native UI framework provided by Apple for building applications on Apple platforms. It combines both declarative syntax and the power of native controls, allowing developers to create highly performant and native-looking applications.

  4. Tools and Ecosystem: React has a mature ecosystem with a wide range of tools and libraries available for different purposes like state management (Redux), routing (React Router), and form handling (Formik). It also has a large community and active developer support. SwiftUI, being a relatively new framework, has a smaller ecosystem with fewer tools and libraries available. However, it is built on top of the existing Swift ecosystem, which is quite extensive.

  5. Platform Support: React is a web-focused framework and can be used to build applications that run on various platforms, including web browsers, desktops, and even servers (with the help of frameworks like Next.js). On the other hand, SwiftUI is specifically designed for building applications on Apple platforms like iOS, macOS, watchOS, and tvOS. It provides tight integration with the underlying operating system and access to native features and APIs.

  6. Community and Adoption: React has gained massive popularity and has a large community of developers using and contributing to the framework. It is widely adopted by companies and has a vast number of resources available for learning and support. SwiftUI, being a relatively new framework, is quickly gaining traction and popularity. However, its adoption is mostly limited to developers building applications for Apple platforms.

In summary, React and SwiftUI are both powerful frameworks for building user interfaces, but they differ in terms of language and platform, component model, React Native vs. native app development, tools and ecosystem, platform support, and community and adoption.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on React, SwiftUI

Cyrus
Cyrus

Aug 15, 2019

Needs adviceonVue.jsVue.jsReactReact

I find using Vue.js to be easier (more concise / less boilerplate) and more intuitive than writing React. However, there are a lot more readily available React components that I can just plug into my projects. I'm debating whether to use Vue.js or React for an upcoming project that I'm going to use to help teach a friend how to build an interactive frontend. Which would you recommend I use?

884k views884k
Comments
Cyrus
Cyrus

Aug 15, 2019

Needs advice

Simple datepickers are cumbersome. For such a simple data input, I feel like it takes far too much effort. Ideally, the native input[type="date"] would just work like it does on FF and Chrome, but Safari and Edge don't handle it properly. So I'm left either having a diverging experience based on the browser or I need to choose a library to implement a datepicker since users aren't good at inputing formatted strings.

For React alone there are tons of examples to use https://reactjsexample.com/tag/date/. And then of course there's the bootstrap datepicker (https://bootstrap-datepicker.readthedocs.io/en/latest/), jQueryUI calendar picker, https://github.com/flatpickr/flatpickr, and many more.

How do you recommend going about handling date and time inputs? And then there's always moment.js, but I've observed some users getting stuck when presented with a blank text field. I'm curious to hear what's worked well for people...

401k views401k
Comments
Malek
Malek

Web developer at Quicktext

Mar 28, 2020

Decided

The project is a web gadget previously made using vanilla script and JQuery, It is a part of the "Quicktext" platform and offers an in-app live & customizable messaging widget. We made that remake with React eco-system and Typescript and we're so far happy with results. We gained tons of TS features, React scaling & re-usabilities capabilities and much more!

What do you think?

244k views244k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

React
React
SwiftUI
SwiftUI

Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project.

Provides views, controls, and layout structures for declaring your app's user interface. The framework provides event handlers for delivering taps, gestures, and other types of input to your app.

Declarative; Component-based; Learn once, write anywhere
Declarative Syntax; Design Tools; Drag and drop; Dynamic replacement; Previews; Native on All Apple Platforms; Generate dynamic, interactive previews of your custom views; Define interactions from taps, clicks, and swipes to fine-grained gestures; Control and respond to the flow of data and changes within your app’s models; Integrate SwiftUI views into existing apps, and embed AppKit, UIKit, and WatchKit views and controllers into SwiftUI view hierarchies; Present your content onscreen and handle user interactions
Statistics
GitHub Stars
240.3K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
49.7K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
182.6K
Stacks
590
Followers
147.0K
Followers
567
Votes
4.1K
Votes
6
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 837
    Components
  • 674
    Virtual dom
  • 579
    Performance
  • 509
    Simplicity
  • 442
    Composable
Cons
  • 41
    Requires discipline to keep architecture organized
  • 30
    No predefined way to structure your app
  • 29
    Need to be familiar with lots of third party packages
  • 13
    JSX
  • 10
    Not enterprise friendly
Pros
  • 2
    Smaller Scalable views
  • 2
    Live previews
  • 2
    XCode Canvas feature
Integrations
No integrations available
macOS
macOS
Swift
Swift
Xcode
Xcode

What are some alternatives to React, SwiftUI?

jQuery

jQuery

jQuery is a cross-platform JavaScript library designed to simplify the client-side scripting of HTML.

AngularJS

AngularJS

AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding.

Vue.js

Vue.js

It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API.

jQuery UI

jQuery UI

Whether you're building highly interactive web applications or you just need to add a date picker to a form control, jQuery UI is the perfect choice.

Svelte

Svelte

If you've ever built a JavaScript application, the chances are you've encountered – or at least heard of – frameworks like React, Angular, Vue and Ractive. Like Svelte, these tools all share a goal of making it easy to build slick interactive user interfaces. Rather than interpreting your application code at run time, your app is converted into ideal JavaScript at build time. That means you don't pay the performance cost of the framework's abstractions, or incur a penalty when your app first loads.

Flux

Flux

Flux is the application architecture that Facebook uses for building client-side web applications. It complements React's composable view components by utilizing a unidirectional data flow. It's more of a pattern rather than a formal framework, and you can start using Flux immediately without a lot of new code.

Famo.us

Famo.us

Famo.us is a free and open source JavaScript platform for building mobile apps and desktop experiences. What makes Famo.us unique is its JavaScript rendering engine and 3D physics engine that gives developers the power and tools to build native quality apps and animations using pure JavaScript.

Riot

Riot

Riot brings custom tags to all browsers. Think React + Polymer but with enjoyable syntax and a small learning curve.

Marko

Marko

Marko is a really fast and lightweight HTML-based templating engine that compiles templates to readable Node.js-compatible JavaScript modules, and it works on the server and in the browser. It supports streaming, async rendering and custom tags.

Kendo UI

Kendo UI

Fast, light, complete: 70+ jQuery-based UI widgets in one powerful toolset. AngularJS integration, Bootstrap support, mobile controls, offline data solution.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase