StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Business Tools
  3. UI Components
  4. Javascript UI Libraries
  5. React vs Twig

React vs Twig

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

React
React
Stacks182.6K
Followers147.0K
Votes4.1K
GitHub Stars240.3K
Forks49.7K
Twig
Twig
Stacks382
Followers157
Votes8

React vs Twig: What are the differences?

React vs Twig

React and Twig are both popular technologies used for web development. While React is a JavaScript library for building user interfaces, Twig is a template engine for PHP. Here are the key differences between React and Twig:

  1. Component-Based vs Template-Based: React is a component-based library, where the user interface is built by creating reusable components with their own logic and rendering them. On the other hand, Twig is template-based, where HTML templates are created with placeholders that are later filled with data.

  2. JavaScript vs PHP: React is written in JavaScript, making it an ideal choice for JavaScript developers. It also allows for the use of JSX (a syntax extension) to write HTML-like code within JavaScript. On the other hand, Twig is specifically designed for PHP applications and is written in PHP.

  3. Virtual DOM vs Server-Side Rendering: React uses a virtual DOM to efficiently update and render components, reducing the need to directly manipulate the actual DOM. This results in improved performance and better user experience. In contrast, Twig relies on server-side rendering, where the HTML templates are processed and rendered on the server before being sent to the client.

  4. Dynamic UI vs Pre-rendered HTML: React allows for dynamic user interfaces, where components can be updated and re-rendered based on user interactions or data changes. This provides a more interactive and responsive experience. Twig, being a template engine, generates static HTML content that is sent to the client. The UI is static and doesn't change unless another request is made to the server.

  5. JavaScript Ecosystem vs PHP Ecosystem: React benefits from a strong JavaScript ecosystem, with a wide range of libraries, frameworks, and tools that can be integrated with it. This allows for easier development and access to a large number of resources. Twig, being a PHP template engine, relies on the PHP ecosystem, which also has its own set of libraries and tools, but the JavaScript ecosystem is generally considered to be larger and more diverse.

  6. Learning Curve vs Familiarity: React, with its component-based approach and usage of JavaScript, may have a steeper learning curve for developers who are new to JavaScript or web development in general. However, for those familiar with JavaScript and its ecosystem, React can be easier to grasp. Twig, on the other hand, is based on HTML and PHP, which are more widely used and familiar to many developers, making it relatively easier to learn.

In summary, React and Twig differ in terms of their approach to building user interfaces, the programming languages they are based on, their rendering strategies, the level of interactivity they provide, the ecosystems they are part of, and the learning curve associated with them.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on React, Twig

Cyrus
Cyrus

Aug 15, 2019

Needs adviceonVue.jsVue.jsReactReact

I find using Vue.js to be easier (more concise / less boilerplate) and more intuitive than writing React. However, there are a lot more readily available React components that I can just plug into my projects. I'm debating whether to use Vue.js or React for an upcoming project that I'm going to use to help teach a friend how to build an interactive frontend. Which would you recommend I use?

884k views884k
Comments
Cyrus
Cyrus

Aug 15, 2019

Needs advice

Simple datepickers are cumbersome. For such a simple data input, I feel like it takes far too much effort. Ideally, the native input[type="date"] would just work like it does on FF and Chrome, but Safari and Edge don't handle it properly. So I'm left either having a diverging experience based on the browser or I need to choose a library to implement a datepicker since users aren't good at inputing formatted strings.

For React alone there are tons of examples to use https://reactjsexample.com/tag/date/. And then of course there's the bootstrap datepicker (https://bootstrap-datepicker.readthedocs.io/en/latest/), jQueryUI calendar picker, https://github.com/flatpickr/flatpickr, and many more.

How do you recommend going about handling date and time inputs? And then there's always moment.js, but I've observed some users getting stuck when presented with a blank text field. I'm curious to hear what's worked well for people...

401k views401k
Comments
Malek
Malek

Web developer at Quicktext

Mar 28, 2020

Decided

The project is a web gadget previously made using vanilla script and JQuery, It is a part of the "Quicktext" platform and offers an in-app live & customizable messaging widget. We made that remake with React eco-system and Typescript and we're so far happy with results. We gained tons of TS features, React scaling & re-usabilities capabilities and much more!

What do you think?

244k views244k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

React
React
Twig
Twig

Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project.

It is a modern template engine for PHP. It is flexible, fast, and secure. Its syntax originates from Jinja and Django templates.

Declarative; Component-based; Learn once, write anywhere
Concise; Template oriented syntax; Full featured; Easy to learn; Extensibility; Unit tested; Documented
Statistics
GitHub Stars
240.3K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
49.7K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
182.6K
Stacks
382
Followers
147.0K
Followers
157
Votes
4.1K
Votes
8
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 837
    Components
  • 674
    Virtual dom
  • 579
    Performance
  • 509
    Simplicity
  • 442
    Composable
Cons
  • 41
    Requires discipline to keep architecture organized
  • 30
    No predefined way to structure your app
  • 29
    Need to be familiar with lots of third party packages
  • 13
    JSX
  • 10
    Not enterprise friendly
Pros
  • 2
    For both nodejs and php
  • 2
    Front to back with no efforts
  • 2
    Gulp
  • 2
    Native html, xml, txt etc
Integrations
No integrations available
PHP
PHP

What are some alternatives to React, Twig?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

jQuery

jQuery

jQuery is a cross-platform JavaScript library designed to simplify the client-side scripting of HTML.

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

AngularJS

AngularJS

AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Vue.js

Vue.js

It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API.

Symfony

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase