StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Business Tools
  3. UI Components
  4. Javascript UI Libraries
  5. React vs WebAssembly

React vs WebAssembly

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

React
React
Stacks182.6K
Followers147.0K
Votes4.1K
GitHub Stars240.3K
Forks49.7K
WebAssembly
WebAssembly
Stacks223
Followers218
Votes0
GitHub Stars8.2K
Forks818

React vs WebAssembly: What are the differences?

  1. Key difference between React and WebAssembly 1: Performance React is a JavaScript library for building user interfaces that uses a virtual DOM to efficiently update and render UI components. WebAssembly, on the other hand, is a binary instruction format that allows running compiled code at near-native speed. This means that WebAssembly can provide faster performance compared to React, especially for computationally intensive tasks.

  2. Key difference between React and WebAssembly 2: Language Support React is primarily developed using JavaScript, which makes it easier for web developers to learn and use. WebAssembly, however, can support multiple languages, including C, C++, Rust, and TypeScript. This versatility allows developers to leverage existing codebases and expertise when using WebAssembly, making it a more flexible choice for certain projects.

  3. Key difference between React and WebAssembly 3: Compatibility React is designed to work across different browsers and can be used for both web and mobile applications. WebAssembly, on the other hand, is supported by major web browsers but may have some limitations depending on the specific features used. This means that while React provides broader compatibility, WebAssembly may require additional considerations for specific use cases.

  4. Key difference between React and WebAssembly 4: Development Workflow React uses a component-based architecture and offers a rich ecosystem of tools and libraries for building UI components. WebAssembly, on the other hand, requires compiling code from a high-level language to the binary format, which can add an extra step to the development workflow. This means that React may be more suitable for rapid development and prototyping, while WebAssembly may require more upfront setup and compilation steps.

  5. Key difference between React and WebAssembly 5: UI Flexibility React excels at building interactive user interfaces and supports features like state management, dynamic rendering, and event handling. WebAssembly, however, is mainly focused on computation and can be used to run complex algorithms or perform heavy calculations. While React offers more flexibility for building user interfaces, WebAssembly can be a powerful tool for performance-critical tasks that go beyond the scope of UI development.

  6. Key difference between React and WebAssembly 6: Learning Curve React is a widely adopted JavaScript library with extensive documentation and a large community. This makes it relatively easier for developers to learn and get started with React. WebAssembly, on the other hand, is a relatively new technology with a steeper learning curve, especially for developers who are not familiar with low-level programming concepts. While React offers a more accessible learning experience, WebAssembly may require additional time and effort to master.

In Summary, React is a JavaScript library for building user interfaces with a focus on UI flexibility and developer-friendly language. WebAssembly, on the other hand, is a binary instruction format that provides better performance and supports multiple languages, but requires additional considerations for compatibility and development workflow.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on React, WebAssembly

Cyrus
Cyrus

Aug 15, 2019

Needs adviceonVue.jsVue.jsReactReact

I find using Vue.js to be easier (more concise / less boilerplate) and more intuitive than writing React. However, there are a lot more readily available React components that I can just plug into my projects. I'm debating whether to use Vue.js or React for an upcoming project that I'm going to use to help teach a friend how to build an interactive frontend. Which would you recommend I use?

884k views884k
Comments
Cyrus
Cyrus

Aug 15, 2019

Needs advice

Simple datepickers are cumbersome. For such a simple data input, I feel like it takes far too much effort. Ideally, the native input[type="date"] would just work like it does on FF and Chrome, but Safari and Edge don't handle it properly. So I'm left either having a diverging experience based on the browser or I need to choose a library to implement a datepicker since users aren't good at inputing formatted strings.

For React alone there are tons of examples to use https://reactjsexample.com/tag/date/. And then of course there's the bootstrap datepicker (https://bootstrap-datepicker.readthedocs.io/en/latest/), jQueryUI calendar picker, https://github.com/flatpickr/flatpickr, and many more.

How do you recommend going about handling date and time inputs? And then there's always moment.js, but I've observed some users getting stuck when presented with a blank text field. I'm curious to hear what's worked well for people...

401k views401k
Comments
Malek
Malek

Web developer at Quicktext

Mar 28, 2020

Decided

The project is a web gadget previously made using vanilla script and JQuery, It is a part of the "Quicktext" platform and offers an in-app live & customizable messaging widget. We made that remake with React eco-system and Typescript and we're so far happy with results. We gained tons of TS features, React scaling & re-usabilities capabilities and much more!

What do you think?

244k views244k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

React
React
WebAssembly
WebAssembly

Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project.

It is an open standard that defines a portable binary code format for executable programs, and a corresponding textual assembly language, as well as interfaces for facilitating interactions between such programs and their host environment.

Declarative; Component-based; Learn once, write anywhere
Efficient and fast; Safe; Open and debuggable; Part of the open web platform
Statistics
GitHub Stars
240.3K
GitHub Stars
8.2K
GitHub Forks
49.7K
GitHub Forks
818
Stacks
182.6K
Stacks
223
Followers
147.0K
Followers
218
Votes
4.1K
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 837
    Components
  • 674
    Virtual dom
  • 579
    Performance
  • 509
    Simplicity
  • 442
    Composable
Cons
  • 41
    Requires discipline to keep architecture organized
  • 30
    No predefined way to structure your app
  • 29
    Need to be familiar with lots of third party packages
  • 13
    JSX
  • 10
    Not enterprise friendly
Cons
  • 2
    Security issues
Integrations
No integrations available
Rust
Rust
C++
C++
C lang
C lang

What are some alternatives to React, WebAssembly?

JavaScript

JavaScript

JavaScript is most known as the scripting language for Web pages, but used in many non-browser environments as well such as node.js or Apache CouchDB. It is a prototype-based, multi-paradigm scripting language that is dynamic,and supports object-oriented, imperative, and functional programming styles.

Python

Python

Python is a general purpose programming language created by Guido Van Rossum. Python is most praised for its elegant syntax and readable code, if you are just beginning your programming career python suits you best.

jQuery

jQuery

jQuery is a cross-platform JavaScript library designed to simplify the client-side scripting of HTML.

AngularJS

AngularJS

AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding.

PHP

PHP

Fast, flexible and pragmatic, PHP powers everything from your blog to the most popular websites in the world.

Ruby

Ruby

Ruby is a language of careful balance. Its creator, Yukihiro “Matz” Matsumoto, blended parts of his favorite languages (Perl, Smalltalk, Eiffel, Ada, and Lisp) to form a new language that balanced functional programming with imperative programming.

Java

Java

Java is a programming language and computing platform first released by Sun Microsystems in 1995. There are lots of applications and websites that will not work unless you have Java installed, and more are created every day. Java is fast, secure, and reliable. From laptops to datacenters, game consoles to scientific supercomputers, cell phones to the Internet, Java is everywhere!

Golang

Golang

Go is expressive, concise, clean, and efficient. Its concurrency mechanisms make it easy to write programs that get the most out of multicore and networked machines, while its novel type system enables flexible and modular program construction. Go compiles quickly to machine code yet has the convenience of garbage collection and the power of run-time reflection. It's a fast, statically typed, compiled language that feels like a dynamically typed, interpreted language.

HTML5

HTML5

HTML5 is a core technology markup language of the Internet used for structuring and presenting content for the World Wide Web. As of October 2014 this is the final and complete fifth revision of the HTML standard of the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C). The previous version, HTML 4, was standardised in 1997.

C#

C#

C# (pronounced "See Sharp") is a simple, modern, object-oriented, and type-safe programming language. C# has its roots in the C family of languages and will be immediately familiar to C, C++, Java, and JavaScript programmers.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase